Tag Archives: MERS

When Spokeo rears its ugly head

(BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED)–The author of this post is a paralegal and consultant to trial attorneys and covers this case in his book, The FDCPA, Debt Collection and Foreclosures, an in-depth analysis of the paradigm shift in debt collection and foreclosure defense litigation strategies. DISCLAIMER: The opinions and case analysis expressed are that of his own and do not constitute legal advice.

Available at CloudedTitles.com

Here we go again … another case in federal appeals court … another recognized attempt by a homeowner that failed when applied to the Spokeo v. Robins case handed down by the United States Supreme Court, 578 U.S. 330 (2016). See the case below:

While the case specifically denotes cases applicable to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, it has been judicially recognized in all 50 states as being the benchmark for proof of injury and raises the bar for such.

The case in chief is Foster v. PNC Bank, N.A. and wouldn’t you know it … Spokeo got tossed in for good measure because the homeowner (Foster) relied solely on his affidavit and couldn’t prove causation. See the case below:

To get to the nuts and bolts of Spokeo and how it was applied to this case, see pages 10-11 of the Foster ruling.

Page 11 of the Foster ruling clearly identifies that Foster lacks standing because the injury he is trying to prove happened is not fairly traceable and under Spokeo, it has to be an actual injury-in-fact! There’s no getting around this if you want Article III standing to pursue such a case.

It looks as if this case could have been done pro se. Most pro se cases fail because of 3 reasons: (1) lack of understanding and application of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (2) lack of understanding of how case law should be applied; and (3) evidence based on emotion and not facts supported by evidence. Once you clearly read this case, you might understand why the author of this post thinks that way.

NOW … Why can’t Spokeo be applied to foreclosure cases?

Why can’t homeowners make the bank or REMIC Trust prove it suffered a concrete injury-in-fact under Spokeo? That question posits multiple answers because there is specific contract law involved.

Based on paralegal-level research, bringing any kind of claim against a creditor should be entertained BEFORE the real problems begin (like getting a notice of default). This author blames homeowners for not constantly checking their public land records for suspect documents, especially in the cases of REMIC trusts, wherein third-party document mills generally crank out manufactured documents that attempt to memorialize when a particular loan (mortgage or deed of trust and note) was actually conveyed into a REMIC trust pool. Sadly, most of the documents creep their way into the public record just before the foreclosure starts. And no one finds that just a little suspicious?

Even more unfortunate, because of the way the deck is stacked in court, judges don’t like giving homeowners free houses just because they come running and screaming into court with a two-dozen (or 200) page complaint, filled with emotion, conjecture and nothing concrete to back it up with, or, in the alternative, attempt to use all that wasted space to try to educate a judge towards their point of view with no attached exhibits or any other evidentiary process to back it up. This author has seen this in hundreds of cases he has reviewed, even by attorneys who thought they were good foreclosure mill attorneys (they miss stuff too)!

The key here, especially in REMIC trust cases (most of which are formed in New York or Delaware), there are commonalities that typically get overlooked and case law can and should be applied whenever possible to support whatever argument is being made. Unfortunately, many pro se litigants miss that opportunity and just continue to rant because they think they were unfairly treated by their mortgage loan servicer, who is the real party behind the foreclosure … not the closed REMIC. What? The REMIC was closed? When?

Does anyone bother to read the REMIC’s 424(b)(5) Prospectus and attempt to tie information into their cases? This author hasn’t seen much evidence of that lately because attorneys dealing in foreclosures believe the judge doesn’t care what happened to the loan if it went into a REMIC trust. This is where knowing how to pick your battles makes all the sense in the world. The Prospectus analysis in of itself can be extremely daunting and time consuming, unless you know where to look. Then you have to apply what you’ve discovered to your discovery to make sure what you think you know can stick in a court of law. It’s called securitization failure.

The bottom line however, is whether the REMIC settled with its investors at any point in time in its history or whether the mortgage loan servicer actually performed under the Prospectus agreement and made the payments of principal and interest as identified under the ADVANCES section of the REMIC’s own governing regulations. If the payments were made by the servicer (whether the Borrower paid them or not) … then who has suffered actual Article III concrete injury-in-fact under Spokeo. There’s the rub.

If the servicer has been paying the certificate holders and the action is being brought on behalf of the certificate holders based on borrower default … how’s that possible? The servicer has paid the monthly payments to the certificate holders, so where’s the concrete injury-in-fact? The borrower isn’t in default if this is happening, are they? Who brings that up in court? Who asks the court to determine an injury-in-fact? Hmmm.

Because the bank is trying to foreclose, the courts automatically assume they own the loan; otherwise, why would they be filing a foreclosure action in the first place?

There’s the other rub. If the case involves a REMIC trust, this author believes with a certainty that the mortgage loan servicer is playing “lender” and claiming it has the right to foreclose when it can’t prove actual concrete injury-in-fact based on contract law because it doesn’t have a contract with the homeowner. Yet, bank’s attorneys come into court and misrepresent those facts all the time in an attempt to create standing for a fictitious plaintiff (one that no longer exists in most cases).

Yep, none of this seems fair, does it? But, as any good paralegal can tell you, all of our collective work is research and if you don’t take the time to do it, you can’t prove anything and your case is dead in the water before you even get started.

Then there’s the other faux pas … suing everything under the sun because they’re identified with the REMIC. Example: MERS. Big waste of time. MERS is owned by the same company that owns the NYSE. Where do you think you fit into that financial scheme of things. MERS has more money than any pro se or attorney-supported litigant out there and will outspend you and give you nothing. Besides, from a paralegal’s standpoint, it adds well more to the costs of processing a case because of service issues, actual service of process, filing responses and memorandums for every single defendant named. So what if MERS was used to electronically facilitate the transfer of securitized mortgage loans. Case law on MERS is so diverse and scattered among the states and federal circuits even the U.S. Supreme Court won’t entertain looking at MERS-related cases 99.9% of the time.

Declaratory Relief Actions

This is why this author likes declaratory relief actions. While these types of actions are discretionary at the federal level, state court judges will normally entertain them. You’re asking for a determination on a question, not a final ruling. To get to the final ruling, you have to have your questions answered, enough to prove your allegations contained a factual basis, as determined by the court. This paralegal and consultant always sees better results when dec relief actions come early and go after specific targets and not just a bunch of ballyhoo on paper. Since most judges are being ordered to clear dockets, does your case really belong in foreclosure court where all the judge sees you as is a deadbeat? Or would it be better if you were in a county court of law where the judge wasn’t occupied with foreclosure as the main issue? This author has seen successes with the latter of the two modes.

Yet homeowners wait until everything is “around their ankles” before they act. The author blames this on the lack of legal education. Spokeo (since its 2016 ruling), has been wielded like a two-edged sword, mostly in favor of the lenders. In closing, this means one would have to spend serious time doing research and digging up the facts to build an actual case. Spokeo is law. Spokeo is not emotion. People would do themselves a big favor by studying the law, especially tort law. Prosser and Keeton on Torts, 5th Edition would be a great start.

The author is also nationally-syndicated talk show host on The Power Hour.

2 Comments

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED

So you think you’re in default, eh?

(Op-Ed) — The author of this post is a paralegal that serves as a title consultant to trial attorneys in foreclosure matters and thus, this article is not intended to render legal advice, nor to be construed as such. It is intended for educational purposes only and is not guaranteed to produce any given legal outcome.

The author of this post will try to keep things simple without passing judgment.

There is no doubt here that we are collectively living in troubled times. The rash of foreclosures continues now that the eviction moratoriums have been lifted for the most part. Those who did not undertake a loan modification or request a forbearance (that was actually granted) are probably feeling the sting of communication by the mortgage loan servicers in their mailing out of late notices on unpaid and delinquent mortgage loans.

According to the terms of the mortgage or deed of trust (depending on which “state” you’re in), there is a specific section on Default. Understand that it’s the mortgage loan servicer’s obligation to collect the mortgage loan debt and route payments to the “lender”, no matter WHO that lender might be.

The problem with defaults, loan modifications and the like is that so many of the loans out there today are securitized through the MERS® System. Since the MERS® System was taken over by the same company that owns the New York Stock Exchange, the information coming out of this entity is scarce to non-existent.

Generally, if you miss a payment, the servicer is going to notify you by certified mail. You may have to sign for the letter. The biggest mistake that homeowners make is ignoring these letters, when in fact, this could be the very start of a long, drawn-out process where you can obtain a lot of useful and vital information that your attorney could use in a foreclosure defense posture, without having to pay gobs in legal fees.

What is a QWR?

That process is called a Qualified Written Request (QWR) under RESPA (the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act) § 6. You can easily research this section of the law and discover that RESPA allows you to send a QWR to the servicer’s bona fide QWR address and ask the servicer to send you specific information, which is discussed below.

The author is going to include a sample QWR from the National Consumer Law Center; however, it comes with a caveat. If you want to delay the foreclosure while gathering evidence, it is suggested by many attorneys that you only request two or three documents at a time and just keep the requests coming. As soon as you get the set of documents you asked for, have another letter drafted, ready to go with another 3 to 4 document requests under the same set of statutes. This prolongs the servicer taking any action against you, while you set out to discover (rather than go through objectionable discovery in court against the servicer who’s trying to steal your home) all of the documents necessary to build a sustainable case.

Several homeowners this author has talked to have utilized QWR’s to stop foreclosures. It was only when their attorneys told them it wasn’t doing any good to continue sending them … and the homeowners quit sending QWRs … that all of a sudden, the servicers foreclosed on them.

Why send a QWR?

Sending the servicer (at their official QWR address, not their main address) a QWR is a great way to get information from the lender’s mortgage loan servicer. Nine times out of ten, it’s the mortgage loan servicer that retains the law firm to foreclose and it’s the mortgage loan servicer whose employees falsify the assignments they use to create standing to steal your home.

Secondly, when asking intially, the following documents are key to asking for follow-up questions:

  1. An unredacted copy of the mortgage or deed of trust
  2. A copy of the note, showing all indorsements and allonges proving custody of the note
  3. A copy of the complete pay history of the loan, including escrows

Do NOT ask for the original note because it’s highly likely the servicer doesn’t have it. If your loan was securitized, it’s also highly likely, given what Judge Jennifer Bailey in Florida was told by the Florida Mortgage Bankers Association (in 2009), that your note was shredded after it was uploaded into the MERS® System.

For those of you doubting Thomases out there, read page 4 of the foregoing letter to the judge … understand that the word “eliminated” is just what it is. The banks got rid of the original loan paperwork because they converted the note into a security. They converted a debt instrument into an equity instrument, which makes no sense at all. The foregoing letter was included as an exhibit in the Osceola County Forensic Examination conducted by the author and his team and attorney Allen D. West, Esq., released to the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Osceola County, Florida on December 30, 2014. Since then, subsequent Clerks have kept the examination report on the county’s website.

This is why asking to see the original note is ludicrous because it doesn’t exist in its purest form.

This is why you want to identify WHO the players are in your chain of title and compare what you get from the mortgage loan servicer’s collateral file with all of the other evidence you are able to obtain from a QWR versus the actual discovery within an expensive lawsuit (right out of the gate).

Day 91

Don’t be fooled by mortgage loan servicers whose employees ask you to be 90 days late on your mortgage loan before they’ll grant you a loan modification. On Day 91, the mortgage loan servicer and the trustee will file for insurance claims on the REMIC and get paid in full for the missing mortgage loan payments not made by the borrowers. If the investors in the REMIC are made whole with a payout by the insurance carriers, then who’s in default? The REMIC has no standing to pursue a foreclosure!

Once you’ve been able to ascertain the “players” in the sandbox, it will make things a lot simpler to identify the culprits and pursue some serious litigation against them.

Listen to Dave Krieger on The Power Hour, 11 a.m. – 1 p.m., Monday – Friday (Central Time) and don’t forget to watch his speech, streaming live on The Power Hour (thepowerhour.com) on Saturday, May 14, 2022, live from Clay Clark’s Reawaken America Tour at the Carolina Opry in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina at 11:15 a.m. Eastern Time.

Leave a comment

Filed under I'm not posting any more stuff on here!

Uptick In Foreclosures? Fraudulent Transfers?

(BREAKING NEWS) — The author of this post posits the following information for educational purposes only and any information contained herein should not be construed to be the rendering of legal advice. For legal advice, you should consult with an attorney that has won several foreclosure cases. NOTE: There are a lot of attorneys out there that think they can defeat a foreclosure; however, these people simply see a monthly annuity and have figured out a way to stall the inevitable.

Years ago, when this author wrote Clouded Titles (his second work, which followed The Credit Restoration Primer, now in its 5th edition), now in its Mayday Edition, he set up an alert in his Google system settings to detect any reference to the phrase Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

The reason for this is because back in 2007, while doing research on chains of title in his local land records, he discovered the widespread appearance of this electronic database throughout his local public record and this was the start of a 2-year quest into researching the sum, substance and function of what most in the legal profession refer to as MERS. After filling up 4 file drawers full of printed material from various articles, court cases and public records (including his own public record filings), this author decided that since there were no actual books out there describing the chicanery on Wall Street and how MERS was involved in it all, that the public needed to know the truth … and this is how Clouded Titles was born.

Thanks to the “alerts” set up in the Google search system, this author is able to monitor perceived upticks in the foreclosure markets, based on what is happening throughout the U.S. and the notices posted in various newspapers’ legal sections throughout the country.

What the author of this post has also noticed is that because the economy is stagnating, people are without incomes. As a result, the propensity to commit crimes against property by filing documents that purport to transfer title into the name of the perpetrator so the property could be listed and sold through nefarious means is also on the rise. Once the property is sold, the foreclosure starts. The author has seen evidence of an uptick in this area as well.

This is why it’s a good idea to check up on your public records involving your property every 3 months, just like you would check up on your credit reports to make sure they’re accurately being reported. County Clerks are paid to assist you in looking up your records if you don’t know how to do it. Many of the databases are online, so they are easily traceable via the county’s search engine. When you conduct a search, you need to be especially aware of any “assignments” of not only mortgages (or deeds of trust) that have been recorded in the public record that transfer an interest in any loan taken out against the property or to detect the insidious crime of property theft by fraudulent deed transfer.

If you suspect you’ve been “taken” in such a manner, the first thing you should do is to go to the County Clerk’s (Recorder, Register of Deeds, Auditor, etc.) office and obtain a certified copy of the suspect document. The second thing you should do is to take that suspect document to your county sheriff and file a formal criminal complaint against the party or parties allegedly effectuating the transfer.

Part of the problem with fraudulent transfers and assignments however, is that the goings-on behind the scenes within law enforcement appears well above the pay grade of the detectives working in the crimes against property unit. This was evidenced in the follow-up meeting with Osceola County, Florida detectives in 2015 (along with the County Attorney, who was obviously “in on it” with them), who couldn’t find any evidence of wrongdoing in the Report this author spent five months working on … and instead, chose to “shoot the messenger” instead. The County Attorney then proceeded to inquire who the forensic team members were that gleaned the public record looking for suspect documents. The information was not required to be provided under the Open Records Act laws, thus, the County Attorney came away from the meeting empty-handed. The detectives however, wanted to know who certified all of the 17 banker’s boxes of suspect documents delivered to the States’ Attorney in Florida’s 9th Circuit, who saw the files and the report as a “political hot potato” and wanted nothing to do with them. Law enforcement in Osceola County, Florida then began to harass and surveil a known member of the forensic team who lived in the county and who was an outspoken critic of the illicit foreclosures taking place in his county. A family member of the forensic team’s liaison was tasered and arrested as he was walking onto his front porch at 3:00 a.m. after being out with his cousin, was not drunk and was not disrespectful or disorderly against the arresting deputies (who were surveilling the home). The charges were eventually dropped. This is just one scenario that happens when one “tries to do the right thing”.

This presents us with another known problem with law enforcement: corruption. Unless your county sheriff is a “constitutional sheriff”, don’t expect your complaint or any potential investigation to go anywhere, especially after having researched the campaign donors to your local district attorney in the last election. This author would encourage you to research CSPOA.org and become a member and get the information necessary to further your campaign in either getting the sheriff on board or finding ways to get him/her ousted from public office.

This author also reminds you (at this juncture) that county sheriffs are bonded. Without a bond (due to forfeiture), they can’t hold office as a sheriff. This is why counties have Risk Managers. A Risk Manager is another word for “damage control”. This individual gets more crap thrown at them from both consumers and county officials as a result of their positions. This is why it’s become harder to find competent people willing to undertake the honest task of “doing the right thing” and getting consumers the information on who the agent is for the bond, along with their address, phone # and policy number.

If the county’s risk manager refuses to give you that information, send an Open Records Act Request under state statutes and demand the information. Once obtained, you may wish to consider filing a complaint against the bond of the individual that failed to do their constitutional duty to protect your rights under the law.

NOTE: This procedure can also be used against school boards as well (that treat parents like domestic terrorists for speaking out at school board meetings); however, that’s not the subject matter of this article so this author won’t dwell on that scenario at this time.

In closing, a genuine foreclosure has to be treated differently. This author would encourage the use of a Qualified Written Request (QWR) under RESPA § 6. Do not ask for originals of any documents because it’s highly likely they don’t exist. Ask for copies of the note and mortgage (or deed of trust); ask for all information contained in your collateral file; ask for copies of your escrow statements and pay histories. Space out your requests (don’t ask for all of it at once). Request it in two or three certified letters to the servicer’s specific QWR address. You might be surprised to learn that mortgage loan servicer error was responsible for the initiation of the foreclosure to begin with.

NOTE: A QWR is not discovery. A QWR is what this author would be doing if he found out every time that his mortgage loan had been transferred or sold. A QWR response can be used to custom-tailor litigation against the servicer and its employees. Above all, remember that the public record may contain damning information in the form of assignments that can be used to help custom-tailor a QWR request. QWR requests from subsequent servicers can also reveal missing documents that were never transferred to the new servicer in the collateral loan file.

Dave Krieger is a nationally-syndicated talk show host on The Power Hour, heard Monday-Friday from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 Central Time; on AM and FM stations across the U.S. and on 7.490 mHz on the shortwave band worldwide. He also consults with attorneys and homeowners on foreclosure cases.

Leave a comment

Filed under BREAKING NEWS

Conspiracy? Maybe Not!

(OP-ED) — The author of this post is a paralegal and investigative journalist whose effort to uncover the truth about foreclosures has led him to author several books on the subject. All of these works, including this article, are posted for the sake of educating the public as to what is really going on and how the deck is stacked against homeowners as the county land records “take a beating” in trash, suspect documents.

WILL THE MORATORIUMS EVER END?

Of course they will … the U.S. Supreme Court just ruled (6-3) against the Biden Administration’s revised version of the CDC-imposed moratorium. You knew it would happen at some point. It makes no difference WHO puts down moratorium rules and for what reason. The U.S. Government always has an “end game”, whether it makes any sense or not … and whether it’s legal or not. The CDC enacts a moratorium and the “person in charge”, who appears to have the “mental acuity of a 2-year-old”, has to ask constitutional lawyers if what he is doing is legal. It has already been ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court that the CDC has no authority to declare a moratorium, yet the U.S. Government does it anyway, simply because it can. If no one says anything, the government and its bureaucratic hierarchy get away with it. And landlords continue to suffer while deadbeat tenants continue to enrich themselves at their expense. Is that fair? Oops. There goes that liberal term “fair” again. Hell, the author can’t even use the word “equitable” here because there is none.

Being a landlord is a business. Landlords have to go out and create wealth using real estate, by whatever means necessary. Some landlords abuse the system by artificially creating wealth to expand their rental basest the expense of tenants. Some landlords truly deserve the name “slumlords”, chiefly because they let their “investments” deteriorate. In the end, someone ends up complaining and the landlords eventually wind up in court, attempting to explain themselves and their degenerative behaviors.

Being a mortgage loan servicer is big business too. Many landlords go out and borrow money to finance homes they intend on renting out. As each home is rented and paid down, the landlords gain equity; however, when tenants don’t pay, landlords can’t pay, and mortgage loan servicers end up “doing their thing”, so long as the government says so. To make the truth plain and simple, because of moratoriums and lockdowns imposed by our government, whether rational or not, at the end of the day, when the moratoriums go away, homeowners who are behind on their mortgage payments aren’t the only ones that are going to be foreclosed on. Landlords who have been struggling trying to keep up with their mortgage payments on their rental properties occupied by non-paying tenants are also going to fall victim to the mortgage loan crisis.

When you interrupt the rental supply chain with “protocols” and “regulations”, things go to hell in a hand basket in short order. That goes for any essential operating parts of machinery needed to keep the supply chain running that cannot be imported because of COVID protocols or for any other excuse the government deems important (imposed by the “do as I say, not as I do” bunch). In any case, the bigger hedge funds, like BlackRock and Vanguard, are all on stand-by with their claws out, ready to swoop down and buy up as much foreclosed real estate as they can feasibly get their hands on. To cover up their tracks, they will (as they currently are doing) use “shell” companies to purchase available properties they can buy up to turn into rental properties. Could this be some sort of conspiracy? Maybe not. Before you sell your property to one of these entities, look them up in the Secretary of State’s database. It may surprise you as to what you find.

THE MEANS TO AN END

There has to be a “method to the madness” (as it were) in order to accomplish the task of depleting Americans of their wealth. Nationalizing the rental market in the hands of a few is one way. If the government and the banks and their henchmen can use the court system to achieve this goal, they’ll do it by any means possible, just like they have since the 2009 foreclosure crisis began. By 2015, there was a lull in the crisis … and it appears that many foreclosure mill law firms ran out of properties to foreclose on and faded into the woodwork. Since the eviction moratoriums were imposed at the beginning of the first quarter of 2020, foreclosure mill law firms have started to reform and are preparing for another onslaught against homeowners, en masse, as soon as the self-proclaimed moratoriums end.

Enter the mortgage loan servicers. In order to achieve foreclosure, the law firms prosecuting these foreclosures (in the civil realm) have to have help. The land records, as screwed up as they are most of the time, don’t reveal the naked truth. Thus, the mortgage loan servicers have to step in and move the process along, by recording trash, suspect documents to avail themselves and their alleged “lenders” of standing to foreclose so the foreclosure mill law firms and their shills have something to argue to the court to win rulings in their favor. The unsuspecting homeowners, who up to this point may or may not have enjoyed their “reprieve” from being kicked out of their homes, don’t even bother to go to the land records in the county their property is located in and check to see what has been “recorded” (NOT FILED) by the mortgage loan servicers. They’re too busy enjoying what’s left of their “destiny”. Or maybe they are sweating bullets, but too preoccupied to go check the records before the SHTF.

In March of 2012, the mortgage loan servicers entered into an agreement with 49 States’ Attorneys General and promised NOT to trash the land records with suspect documents. No sooner did the ink dry however, the mortgage loan servicers were back to business, continuing the process they were so good at in facilitating the 2009 foreclose crisis … creating false documents and causing them to be recorded … slandering one property’s title after another.

In October of 2012, DK Consultants LLC out of Texas was retained by the Williamson County Clerk to come into the courthouse in Georgetown, Texas (inside of a locked basement office occupied also by the Clerk’s deputies) and conduct a “cursory audit” of documents the Clerk (Nancy Rister) and her deputies had culled from the county’s land records. In January of 2013, a report was presented to the Williamson County Commissioner’s Court (behind locked doors with sheriff’s deputies standing guard), while the consultant, his attorney and the County Clerk presented their findings to a somewhat stunned county commission. The commissioners had no idea their even their own records were looked into to see if they were affected and some of them were surprised to find out that “suspect” documents existed in their own back yards!

In July of 2014, DK Consultants was again retained to investigate and compile data from the Osceola County, Florida land records. Due to previous suppositions formed out of the Williamson County Real Property Records Audit, the team, which consisted also of a foreclosure defense attorney (Al West), began a 4-day arduous task of compiling certified copies (in a hotel meeting room in Osceola County, with direct access to county land records supplied by the county’s IT department) of what appeared to be “suspect” recordings of trash documents. On December 30, 2014, a 758-page report (Osceola County Forensic Examination), accompanied by an attorney opinion letter, was released to the Osceola County Clerk of the Circuit Court (Armando Ramirez) containing the findings of the examination, accompanied by 17 bankers boxes of certified documents that the team deemed as suspect.

As in the previous audit, the media again swooped down to have a “field day” in an attempt to “shoot the messenger”, because a definite “pattern” of behavior had emerged and had become evident and exposed in the report. The evidence wasn’t pretty; however, this was a report and not an indictment. This was investigative work. This wasn’t a grand jury. Some foreclosure defense attorneys, like Matt Weidner, went on camera and scoffed at the report, not bothering to notice the attorney opinion letter, stating the report, “wasn’t worth the paper it was printed on.” As a result of that interview, people reading Weidner’s blog posts slammed his ass good for defaming the report.

In the weeks and months that followed, the author of the report (the author of this post), received dozens of calls from attorneys and law firms who obtained a copy of this report from the Clerk’s website, wanting more information, commenting that they were seeing the same patterns of behavior that the report evidenced in their cases. Could this be some sort of conspiracy? Maybe not.

THE LAND RECORDS DON’T LIE

The pattern of behavior that was exposed since the reintroduction of securitization into the American economy (through the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act) is still made manifest today. The pattern of trash document manufacturing started and continued by the title companies (as early as 2002) and their employees and third-party document mills retained to keep the pattern from being identified through expanded “arms length transactions” was set into motion. As time progressed, it became more evident that the blatant attempts to “connect the dots” within the chain of title became more ominous in nature as the mortgage loan servicers themselves decided to partake in the game of document fabrication (from around 2004 and beyond). The use of “MERS” (Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) became popular as 5,500+ subscribers to that system (including the Secret Service and the FBI) made use of that database to log in and enter data they owned, inputting their data which identified a long string of promissory note transfers from entity to entity which affected each reported mortgage loan.

In order to “tie off loose ends”, something had to be done to make the land records “jive” with the actual transfers of the promissory notes; thus, MERS became an uninvolved “player” in the game of trash assignments. But the pattern of behavior (by 2009) had become more predominant, when the foreclosure mill law firms themselves became involved in the document manufacturing. Vis a vis discovery, it was further made manifest that the mortgage loan servicers and the law firms that were involved in the creation of these trash documents were connected via what are known as “servicing platforms” (i.e. VendorScape, ServiceLink, etc.), wherein the law firms and their employees could communicate through these platforms with the mortgage loan servicers, to create plausible trash documents that would attempt to “match up” with the alleged “path” the note traveled in an effort to bat clean-up to whitewash the securitization process and make the attorneys’ stories to the judge more plausible.

Homeowners in many counties who discovered the discrepancies in their land records (many of whom found themselves facing foreclosure) complained to the county clerks and recorders of what they found when they obtained copies of what was recorded in the official property records in their respective counties. This is how the county clerks and recorder and registers of deeds became aware and thus involved in identifying just how serious and widespread this trash recording system had proliferated the entire country. Soon other clerks and recorders were looking into their records and to their amazement, this same pattern emerged out of their own back yards. Sadly, many clerks and recorders “stuck their heads in the sand”, while others did not and became very vocal about it, even filing lawsuits against MERS and the mortgage loan servicers and banks they claimed were responsible for the mess.

Based on the direct involvement and research and collective meetings with foreclosure defense attorneys, clerks, recorders and registers of deeds over the matter, the author of this post soon put together Clouded Titles … now in its Mayday Edition (432 pp.) and as that book started to circulate, even judges and court officials became aware that people were “taking notice” and writing about it. One federal magistrate chuckled when this author gave him one of the initial copies of the book, recognizing why MERS was trying to have him (the author) ejected from a federal settlement conference in Kansas City in 2011. All the judge had to do was look at the title and he “got it”.

The judges in today’s system are very much aware of the trash document problem. However, because the banks donate money to their election campaigns, judges are reluctant to acknowledge the document’s negative effect on any given property’s chain of title. They’re more concerned with who has the promissory note; no matter how the “ends were tied together” to make the foreclosure mill attorney’s “story” more plausible. It didn’t matter. And homeowners, relying on foreclosure defense attorneys (many of whom were clueless as to the real issues), faltered through their foreclosure cases which ended up in the homeowners being kicked out of their homes. Most common judicial answer given … “We can’t hurt the banks.” As in the previous audit, the media again swooped down to have a “field day” in an attempt to “shoot the messenger”, because a definite “pattern” of behavior had emerged and had become evident and exposed in the report. The evidence wasn’t pretty; however, this was a report and not an indictment. This was investigative work. This wasn’t a grand jury. Some foreclosure defense attorneys, like Matt Weidner, went on camera and scoffed at the report, not bothering to notice the attorney opinion letter, stating the report, “wasn’t worth the paper it was printed on.” In the weeks and months that followed, the author of that report (the author of this post), received dozens of calls from attorneys and law firms who obtained a copy of this report from the Clerk’s website, wanting more information, commenting that they were seeing the same patterns of behavior that the report evidenced in their cases. Could this be some sort of conspiracy? Maybe not.

ATTACKING THE PROCESS

In examining the land records, the author of this post (who has examined thousands of such records) had to take the emotion completely out of what he was seeing in the examination of each document. One would have to realize there indeed was a “fact pattern” that had emerged in order to recognize and identify the culprits. One would have to have certain investigative knowledge of how the mortgage loan servicers retained independent contractors and support bases of employees who did nothing more than create, execute and cause to be recorded the successive chain of nonsense that (to this day) continue to show up in every foreclosure case on the planet as “evidence”. This is exactly what California attorney Al West learned in an interview with one of the independent contractors that worked at the Bank of America Simi Valley “document manufacturing plant”.

Homeowners need to become aware of what is in the land records. The reason that the clerks’ offices have “deputies” is to help homeowners locate these records (if they need help). One who is of the mindset to be educated on attacking the process first has to “get the goods” by paying for copies of every recorded document since they owned the property and analyzing their chains of title and how each document in the chain applies to their given scenario.

The commonality that these trash documents all share in today’s times is that multiple parties were involved in the creation, execution and recordation of these suspect assignments, substitution of trustees, notices of default and sale and notices of lis pendens. Each false recording slanders title. That is a given. There’s no getting around it. It then becomes the responsibility of the homeowner to identify WHO slandered his title, while keeping their emotions in check. If you, the homeowner, were pissed because of what you found, you can’t think straight and your final analysis will be flawed because you will miss important “markers”.

This author wrote about all of those “markers” in his book Clouded Titles, now in its Mayday Edition. Nothing has changed in the nature and scope of the way these documents are produced; however, the method by which you can attack them in court has become a little more refined. This author is not going to get verbose here; however, there is a full DVD-training kit, along with a manual of sample pleadings that this author used to successfully get rid of a trash document in a land record in Florida, which is included in The C & E on Steroids! … also available for your educational benefit.

The key here is to attack the document when it first appears in the land records. If you wait until the foreclosure process has started, you’ll find your action consolidated by the court into the foreclosure case and thus, a foreclosure court judge will be hearing the matter instead of an unbiased county court at law judge. Thus, checking the land records if you even think you’re going to get behind in your mortgage payments would be more than prudent at this point … and keep checking every week … because you never know when the S is going to HTF.

YOU CAN BE YOUR OWN SUPER SLEUTH!

A word of encouragement is offered here, because homeowners this author has interviewed are fighting back. One homeowner in Florida is in Year 13 of his litigation. He has been scoffed at by judges, intimidated by bailiffs, trashed by foreclosure mill attorneys and deceived by the federal court system. Yet, he’s still at it … he has the house rented out and is still fighting the foreclosure … largely in part because he chose to keep researching and investigating his case.

Again, this author has a subscription to Been Verified. This is probably the most affordable tool to researching individual players “in the game”. It’s amazing what you can find out about bank employees, mortgage loan servicer employees and third-party document hacks and notaries. Using the secretary of states’ databases can help you track notary commissions and read up on the rules. DO NOT CONTACT THE PLAYERS THEMSELVES!!! Yes … the author knows that if you’re a pissed off homeowner, the propensity to “reach out and touch someone exists”; however, a caveat here: You risk killing your case if you attempt to contact those whom you are investigating. It’s amazing that in one case, a California homeowner and his attorney are still trying to find former Nationwide Title Clearing (Palm Harbor, Florida) employee Jessica Sheetz. She keeps “relocating” every time the process server gets close. She got tipped off because someone called her employer, inquiring as to her employment status. It takes only one simple phone call to screw your case permanently … so avoid the temptation.

Public records are also a great way to track corporations. Most of the websites will allow you to download copies of their corporate filings. You can also go to sec.gov or subscribe to secinfo.com to track documents that might show you mergers and acquisitions between firms.

Hell … this author found out (through his Austin attorney) that the law firm of Brice, Vander Linden & Wernick was dissolved 3 weeks after the Williamson County Real Property Records Audit was released and made public. That law firm was named in the report multiple times, which, upon discovering their mention in the audit, faded into the woodwork to avoid scrutiny. Talk about having an impact! Stuff like this doesn’t happen every day; but when it does, you bask in the thought you might have made a difference in someone’s life.

As a footnote … this author is contemplating doing another live foreclosure defense workshop in a “free state” (that means a Red State), where you can travel (for the moment) without having to worry about vaccine mandates and mask wearing and freely exchange ideas and learn new tactics for staying in your home for simply being proactive.

Of course, we recommend that if you’re sick, you have enough smarts to stay home and watch the program in limited view on live stream and take notes. Again, your thoughts and comments are welcome.

Remember, “they” win when YOU give up! Your comments are welcome as to the proposed workshop! The author will attempt to have attorneys present that can answer legal questions as we explore the simplest ways to extend the life of your stay past any moratorium (and maybe even win your case)!

Leave a comment

Filed under OP-ED, Securitization Issues

ADVANCES, explained

(OP-ED) — The author of this post is a consultant and paralegal to attorneys practicing in foreclosure defense matters and their related fields and thus, the information offered in this post should be considered research for educational purposes only and not the rendering of legal advice.

“My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.” (Biblical quote in part)

Most homeowners that retain counsel to look into matters involving foreclosure only scrape the tip of the iceberg when it comes to dealing with REMIC trusts. A REMIC (Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit) is a common law trust set up by a hedge fund that is primarily funded by “certificate holders”. The “certificate holders” are investors or investment groups that buy securities from the hedge fund. The securities are created from lists of mortgage loans, all pooled together in a package, that are sold to investors, who receive shares (certificates) which represent their stake in the matter. The amount of “shares” given to the certificate holders depends on the amount of funding they’ve contributed to the REMIC trust and to which tranche they purchased certificates in (some tranches are riskier than others, by design). It’s much like getting stock certificates when you buy stock in a company on Wall Street, especially when it comes to the risk of loss.

Each REMIC trust has a Master Servicer by design. REMIC trusts can also incorporate mortgage loan servicers and sub-servicers if it so deems, for the purposes of collecting the monthly mortgage payments from borrowers.

Each REMIC trust has a Cut-Off Date, where all paperwork that is represented as “filed” with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission via the Trustee of the Trust, has to be forwarded to the Trustee prior to the closing of the Trust.

Each REMIC trust has a Closing Date, in which the documents have all been tendered to the Trustee of the Trust. The Trustee then issues the certificates to the certificate holders, who then receive principal and interest payments from the servicer every month. The IRS refers to the Closing Date as the “Start-Up Date” of the trust, when the trust officially is closed for business and exists according to law for one (1) year.

Each REMIC trust has a Distribution Date … and this is important … because whether or not the borrower makes a payment or not … the servicer is required to advance proceeds from the sums collected from all of the borrowers, to the certificate holders in the form of principal and interest payments. The Distribution Date is generally somewhere between the 20th and 25th of every month, according to the majority of REMIC trust filings this author has reviewed.

The Certificate Holders are buying securities, which are batches of securitized loans that have all been pooled together into a CDO (Collateralized Debt Obligation).

Each REMIC has an ADVANCES section, which explains in detail how the mortgage loan servicers pay the certificate holders on the Distribution Date, whether the Borrowers make their mortgage payments or not.

When the Borrowers go to their respective “corresponding lenders” (part of the table-funding process), that lender checked to see whether the Borrowers’ credit scores were worthy of their best, low-interest loans. If the borrower’s credit scores were “shitty”, they generally ended up in subprime loan pools, which the government now frowns on lender’s from making. These were the riskiest loans made, thus, more attractive to investors because of the high-interest returns they would get on their certificates (from playing in the secondary markets).

Fast Forward to the Foreclosure Process

Now that it’s been simply explained how the system came into play, one must also understand that the servicers continue to collect for the certificate holders once the trusts have hit their one-year mark and expire. When the borrowers have begun to make payments on their mortgage loans, they are told to make at least 3 payments. Why?

Because it takes at least 3 payments to get the entire securities package set into motion. But wait! The Closing Date stated that (in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for each REMIC trust) that all paperwork had to be “in” to the Trustee by that time, as the Trustee was issuing certificates to the certificate holders! The idea of being able to pay for at least 3 months was designed to send a false representation to investors that the loans were “good”, when the originators knew the “sewer would back up” at a point in time in the future.

The lenders also know that because of most of the predatory loans they issued, they knew already that the default rate was going to be higher because these loans weren’t really “qualified” loans under the law. The loan originators went to various insurance companies and purchased default insurance to guarantee that if the borrower defaulted, the certificate holders would be paid the value of their shares via the default insurance payment.

If a foreclosure indeed occurred … and knowing that the default insurance (and other means of reimbursement vehicles were initiated, such as credit default swaps, PMI, LPMI, MIP, title insurance, etc.) would pay out after Day 91 of the Borrowers’ default on their loans … the certificate holders were paid, assumedly by the servicer, right?

How then, did the certificate holders (for which the trustee represents to the court or in the notices of default at the time of the foreclosure) suffer financial harm? How did they suffer an actual injury-in-fact if they were being paid by the mortgage loan servicers every month?

When a borrower files suit against the servicer and the REMIC trust, they completely miss the boat on Injury-in-fact (see the article on Lessons Learned from Spokeo on this blog site) issues. By that time, a plethora of questionable documents have been recorded in the land records in the county where the subject property is located. These documents, suspiciously referred to as Assignment of Mortgage or Assignment of Deed of Trust, were more than likely generated by the mortgage loan servicers themselves or through third-party document mills, as a means of “batting clean-up” in the land records. These assignments all attempt to link the chain of title to the current alleged lien holder, albeit, questionably.

Who is the damaged party here?

Various attorneys that this author has consulted have all maintained that 99.9% of the foreclosures involving REMIC trusts are illegal. In California, notices are given to prospective bidders that they are only bidding on the lien and not the property itself. After the foreclosure occurs, the Trustee or the law firm allegedly representing it, issue a Trustee’s Deed Upon Sale. The problem here is … the Trustee is deeding the land over to the new buyer, who, if they would have read the damned sale notice, were only buying the lien and not the property itself! Judges gloss over all this because they don’t give a shit about the borrower. Judges can’t even be bothered to apply the law as it’s written, which is why America has appellate courts. The problem is, most borrowers can’t afford to even litigate the foreclosure let alone the appellate phase of the matter. The judges know this, which is why they don’t give a shit how they rule. Seldom do you ever find an honest judge that actually reads, understands the facts at hand and rules accordingly. The honest judges even have a hard time sifting through the facts if the borrower’s attorney doesn’t understand who he’s litigating against and why.

If the borrower’s attorney were to simply ask the court: “Your Honor, if my client’s house is sold on the courthouse steps today, who gets the money?”, the judge would then inquire of the foreclosing lender’s attorney WHO is being represented here. The Plaintiff’s attorney will always acknowledge that he represents the Plaintiff, when the Plaintiff’s attorney knows damned well he’s being paid by the mortgage loan servicer, who is coming to court under stealth, in the name of the lender (REMIC trust) to steal the house to reimburse itself for the payments.

When the Borrower’s attorney goes to court, the attorney and his client are faced with the submission of a payment history from the servicer showing the borrower’s history of mortgage loan payments and when they stopped making them. The Plaintiff bank then asserts that since that date, the certificate holders haven’t received payments, which is false. The servicer has been paying them all along and the servicer, the real party behind the foreclosure action, has failed to tender the payment history, post-borrower-payments made. The servicer should be required to disclose ALL payments made to the certificate holders of the REMIC trust, because the Trustee is claiming that the payments the borrower was making were the only payments made to the certificate holders, which is also false.

The servicer is the real party in interest here … and they’re in court trying to recover all of their payments … and then some. When they sell the home, they are going to recoup tens of thousands of dollars, in addition to the booty collected through the default insurance and all of the other payoff methods. In fact, mortgage loan servicing is big business and it’s a dirty one too. Not one mortgage loan servicer that has been “taken to task” to the fullest extent of the law (in court) has come away with clean hands; that is, if the attorneys who are litigating for the borrowers actually know what they’re doing.

The borrower does not have a contract with the mortgage loan servicer!

If this is the case, then what is the servicer doing in court, claiming to represent a closed REMIC trust, after the trust and the servicer have been paid multiple times over by all of the claimed default mechanisms?

This is where it’s estimated that a $500,000 mortgage loan nets the securitized trust $7,000,000 dollars. You read that right! Given all of the payouts the servicer got after Day 91, the certificate holders were all made whole. How then were the certificate holders damaged? They have no standing to come into court. They got away with the foreclosure because of borrower ignorance.

When the first run of foreclosures occurred in 2009-2014, 97.5% of the borrowers served with notices packed up their belongings and ran. Two (2%) percent of them attempted to deal with the mess in court themselves and got their asses handed to them. The other point 5 percent (0.5%) retained attorneys or were successful pro se because they bothered to do their research … but sadly, because of the way the system is “rigged” in favor of the banks, the banks’ servicers have loads of money to spend (and they will spend it) to legally outmaneuver the borrower, making it virtually impossible to win their case. It is estimated that 1 out of 100 foreclosures heard by the courts will actually go anywhere, especially to appeal. Those are very bad odds, especially to those who lack the knowledge necessary to make the banks prove the default and the actual harm occurred.

One Footnote: The Credit Risk Manager

As a footnote to this research, one should also understand that some of these REMICs have what is known as a Credit Risk Manager. These are third-party firms that are fee retained (for a small percentage of the collected funds of all payments submitted to the REMIC, generally 0.0135% per annum of the Scheduled Principal Balance of each Mortgage Loan) to monitor the activities of the mortgage loan servicers collecting for the REMICs. Had the borrower’s attorney known this entity existed, it would have been so easy to depose them and all their records, to see just who was paying whom and when. But again, no one is paying attention.

Here’s an example of one SEC filing from a 424(b)(5) Prospectus:

Taken from Page S-69 from a 424(b)(5) Prospectus issued on behalf of First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF15

This is one of many “hired guns” that are put in place to monitor the activities of the mortgage loan servicers and master servicers. Can you imagine the shit show if you discovered that these people were being paid to monitor specific payments on your mortgage loan and the advice they gave the servicers was non-existent? That could constitute a breach of their contract! And that’s just one issue you might discover if you can get this entity into a deposition!

Read the foregoing paragraphs carefully! Notice where it says the Credit Risk Manager will provide a “loan-level loss and mitigation analysis and a prepayment premium analysis” to the REMIC’s Master Servicer and Servicer? This basically describes how the party making the payments to the Certificate Holders (who are allegedly in court claiming they were harmed) different analyses of ways to “make them whole” (mitigate their losses), meaning the Master Servicer and the Servicer, who have to pay principal and interest on the Distribution Date, every month, whether the Borrower pays their mortgage payment or not!

THE LAST STRAW

In the Osceola County Forensic Examination, the author of this post, who prepared the report, included as EXHIBIT 29 the following letter that you should read if you want to understand HOW the servicer is allowed to reimburse itself for ADVANCES paid out. For all intents and purposes, it’s an admission by the now-defunct Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC as to HOW it does its business:

If you want some real “background” on how the servicing game is played, you should download this PDF Exhibit 29 and read it thoroughly and research its contents BEFORE engaging the servicer or BEFORE you start drafting pleadings. The party you are going after in court is NOT the REMIC trust! This document should make things plain and simple for you regarding the explanation of how the servicer treats ADVANCES.

1 Comment

Filed under I'm not posting any more stuff on here!