Tag Archives: Dave Krieger

Foreclosure and your civil rights: A judge rules against you in spite of questionable land record documents … what to do next? (PART I)

(OP-ED) — This overview of cases involving civil rights abuses are the author’s opinions based on his legal research and are for educational purposes only and should not constitute any rendering of legal advice or seek to draw any conclusions of law. The first five points are discussed below:

The time at which a § 1983 claim accrues “is a question of federal law,” “conforming in general to common-law tort principles,” and is presumptively–but not always–“when the plaintiff has ‘a complete and present cause of action.'” Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 388 (2007); Manuel v. Joliet, U.S. Sup. Ct. No. 14-9496 (2017).

— As cited in McDonough v. Smith, U.S. Sup. Ct. No. 18-485 (2019)

This post is circumspect as to the discussion of the items postulated within the land record audit and forensics investigation conducted by the author and his team of researchers in Williamson County, Texas (2012-2013) and Osceola County, Florida (2013-2014), respectively. Anyone who has read through these 179-page and 758-page reports will realize that they are just that … the means to call out an injustice that should have come to light, but never did, during the period following the 2008 financial collapse. Over 10-million homes were taken through both judicial and non-judicial means … and this case, coupled with several others discussed in this post, culminate into what the author has determined is a potentially valid 42 USC § 1983 civil rights claim, which must be filed in federal court in a timely manner.

FALSE AND MISREPRESENTATIVE STATEMENTS

As both of the foregoing reports concluded, documents numbering into the tens of thousands poured into the land records of all 3,041 counties and boroughs across America, each containing false and misrepresentative statements that predicated the actions taken by the banks’ servicers. These documents were generally created under the orders of the servicers themselves and were generally executed by the servicers’ employees, posing as Assistant Secretaries, Vice Presidents or other “loan documentation” employees of the servicer, posing as representatives of the alleged Lenders “in an official capacity”, when in fact, many of these signers were $10/hour paid flunkies who sat around in cubicles and signing rooms, affixing their signatures and notarial seals by the hundreds … per hour, without reading or knowing of the contents contained within the documents as to their validity!

Better than 99% of these documents continue to litter these same land records to this very day and only about .001% of Americans are the wiser.

POINT #1: When the alleged civil rights infraction has occurred

In the McDonough v. Smith case, which was based on a New York State criminal action, the action came to rest in the hands of the United States Supreme Court, which decided on June 20, 2019, in a very narrow opinion, that the action taken by elected official McDonough against prosecutor Smith was untimely. The allegations were based on the alleged manufacture of evidence against McDonough by Smith, not once, but twice. Due to this prosecution (by Smith), McDonough was deprived of his liberty (put in jail) due to this allegedly manufactured evidence. From the foregoing statement that is highlighted in bold-faced type, you can clearly ascertain WHEN you get to file a civil rights-based lawsuit … AFTER your foreclosure has been completed against you and you’ve lost your property at sale.

POINT #2: It is assumed that you are taking notice of the offenders

In order to make this case in point, the author is relying on the assumption that anyone reading the audit and forensic examination will come to realize that not all is copacetic in assignment-land. It is the assignment of the mortgage or deed of trust that is posited here as “manufactured evidence”, to be relied upon for a “conviction”, even though the intended venue is the civil realm and not the criminal. However, the alleged criminal activity involving the manufacture of the documents, which generally appear years after the alleged transfer of notes into REMIC trusts or some other junk debt pool, which says it’s a trust but in reality is nothing more than a third-party debt buyer deceiving both the land recorders and the civil judges alike, is at stake here due to the reliance of its validity.

It is further assumed that every party involved with or “touching” that assignment from its inception to its recorded form and relying upon it thereafter in the taking of your home, knowing the statements contained within said assignment were false and misrepresentative, is McDonough in the civil realm. The documents predated a civil prosecution (foreclosure) and were manufactured as part of a suspected criminal act.

To make it more plain and simple, YOU, the homeowner, did not deceive the land record, the servicers’ employees did. Maybe the law firm acting on behalf of the servicer did by furthering the lie. Maybe the judge knew or should have known that the documents in the case in chief contained questionable statements; however, chose to ignore them for the sake of convenience in clearing off a packed court docket without giving the homeowner (or his attorney) a chance to prove that the prosecution’s case was based on false evidence.

POINT #3: The aspects of perjury and the subornation thereof

18 USC § 1621 (in pertinent part): “Whoever–having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contract to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true … is guilty of perjury and shall … be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”

18 USC § 1622 (in pertinent part): “a person convicted of subornation of perjury may be fined $2,000 and sentenced to up to five years in prison.”

Under the latter, there are five elements which must be proven: (1) that the defendant make an agreement with the person to testify falsely; (2) that the perjury was in fact committed by the offender; (3) the false statements of the perjurer were material to the outcome of the case; (4) that the statements were made knowing of their falsity; and (5) there must be proof that the procurer had knowledge that the perjurer’s statements were false.

This is one of the key issues presenting itself as to the “further than arm’s length transactions” involved in foreclosure so as to create plausible deniability on the part of the perpetrators. Much of this can be ferreted out in depositions, which California attorney Al West has seen first hand.

POINT #4: The recorded alleged false statements in the land record

From the fact patterns discussed in the two foregoing reports, which are shown here for your review (if you so choose) …

… it became obvious to the author (in compiling the data shown in each of the reports) that a fact pattern involving timely suspect behavior occurred at about the time of the prosecution of the foreclosure, despite the fact the alleged information contained within the assignments that showed up in the land records just prior to (or in some cases AFTER the foreclosure action was started) the foreclosure case had indeed occurred.

It should also be noted here that these reports were not indictments, but merely “call outs” to alleged misbehavior on the part of third-party document mills or deceitful acts authorized or carried out by the mortgage loan servicers themselves. In March of 2012, the servicers collectively told the states and the federal government they wouldn’t create suspect documents and record them in the land records anymore, but as history shows (as demonstrated by the audit and forensic examination), no sooner was the ink dry on that agreement, it was back to business as usual.

Thus, the chains of title have been presumedly corrupted by this behavior, which of late, has gotten more sinister in nature, covered up by recorded powers of attorney that appear to grant some sort of authority to misbehave in the drafting of such documents, with no one the wiser.

POINT #5: The statements made within the foreclosure process itself

The next set of documents that appear suspect in the prosecution of the actual foreclosure itself are shown to be that of the “affidavits” or “declarations” made by the servicer’s employee, attached in similar form to both judicial and non-judicial actions. The difference here is that the non-judicial action contains a recorded statement known similarly as “Notice of Default and Election to Sell” and “Notice of Trustee’s Sale”. In both instances, these recorded notices contain the alleged suspect statements, predicated by the suspect assignment, then followed by the alleged “Appointment of Substitute Trustee”, which is not “neutral” by any means.

The judicial aspect involves the filing of a foreclosure complaint and the sworn declaration that accompanies the complaint filing, assumedly from the lender’s representative, when in fact, it’s the servicer’s employee making the statements. These statements then find their way into the initial court case filing.

The second “whammy” is when the servicer’s employee, who has been assumedly “coached” as to how to testify, many times in mock trials at the servicer’s headquarters so that their testimony is groomed to become so believable that the homeowner’s attorney swears the employee is telling the truth, that this is where the suspect “open court subornation of perjury” indeed occurs because: (1) the person testifying has been educated by the servicer to become a professional liar; and (2) the person testifying is relying on the suspect manufactured documents created by others and recorded in the land records of the county the subject property is located in.

HOMEOWNERS CAUGHT UNAWARES

As history has shown us, when the foreclosure debacle first started to litter the courts with cases, 97% of the noticed homeowners “cut and ran” without even entertaining the options. Their “Come to Jesus” meetings were based on fear of a bad result, predicated by a string of unfortunate events, which forced them to simply pack up and flee. The banks and their servicers were counting on this … and they succeeded admirably.

The other 3% of homeowners attempted to retain unlearned attorneys, who were naive as to the trickery committed not only in the land records, but through the MERS® System of things and the illicit behavior of the foreclosure mills … and bad case law affecting homeowners. It took awhile for these defense attorneys to come to grips with what was actually going on … and by then, even the judges were led to believe that what they were doing was above board, when in fact, it was based on manufactured evidence that should have been brought to light beforehand.

And this is why the author and California Attorney Al West created:

The C & E on Steroids!

… because these declaratory relief actions should predicate the foreclosure action, not only creating delays, but to serve as a warning to those who would involve themselves in the chain of deceit involving the taking of a person’s property.

Sadly, 99.9% of all homeowners fail to understand this strategy, which could force a court to quiet title to any given piece of affected property and potentially cause a criminal action to be pursued against those committing perjury and suborning perjury in their sworn statements of record.

What most foreclosure victims also don’t understand is that the application of a civil rights action is also predicated on the denial of declaratory relief, which is the basis for the Cancellation & Expungement (C & E) Action.

Everything that the author has discussed in PART I is the “set-up” to what liability could be ascertained throughout the foreclosure case itself, which a person with some skill and knowledge could do the research on to identify the most likely culpable targets therein.

IN PART II the author will discuss the pertinent parts of various cases in which the courts have identified these misrepresentations and what part of “all is not lost” applies to you, even if you lose on appeal. Yes, there are administrative remedies which have to be exhausted if one is going to go after an attorney, a judge and/or the county that pays them … and how the counties insure themselves against liability … out of a self-insured risk pool.

IN PART III … the author will discuss the attack strategy in the realm of 42 USC § 1983 and 42 USC § 1985, focusing not just on the perpetrators of the phony documents, but also at the attorneys involved in the prosecution of the foreclosures and the judges and the counties that employ them when the judges make bad decisions (like Al West says the judges say to him when approached about the documents, “What else ya got?”), which could make them accomplices to perjury and the subornation thereof.

Leave a comment

Filed under OP-ED, Securitization Issues

FORECLOSURE DEFENSE 101

(BREAKING NEWS) — Registration for this year’s “foreclosure defense” basics workshop is now open!

THE FORECLOSURE DEFENSE 101 WORKSHOP

This workshop will be held online via a webinar format (GoToMeeting), which automatically records the entire 4-hour presentation so you can watch it over and over again after the workshop has ended!

The downloadable flyer contains the entire syllabus, which represents the tools you’ll need to fight a foreclosure, whether it’s judicial or non-judicial in nature! Plus, the registration form is also included (when you read the Registration Form, you’ll know why we’ve included it).

This live event is hosted by Clouded Titles author Dave Krieger, who will feature California attorney Al West (who Dave has co-authored two different books and DVD video sets with) and R. J. Malloy (Dave’s retired attorney co-host on City Spotlight – Special Edition on WKDW-FM), a 9-year-tenured law clerk for a former U. S. District Court judge! One better … Ron Gillis will also be joining us in studio (live from Florida) to discuss how he has been able to stave off a bank foreclosure on his home for over 12 years!

Plus … we’ll be covering courtroom procedures and protocols, which is something we didn’t normally cover in our previous classes … a new addition which promises to add some serious “spark” to your foreclosure defense campaign to stay in your home!

THE BIGGER PICTURE

The foreclosure realm is like one big sandbox. You’re in one corner. The judge is in the corner to the right of you. The foreclosure mill attorney is facing you in the opposite corner, while the sneaky mortgage loan servicer’s “witness” is hiding behind his COVID mask in the corner to your left. Once you know WHO your opponents are … it makes it easier to know when and where to “kick the sand”. In this author’s world, no one wants to “play with you” when you’re no fun to play with. No one likes bullies either … and that’s what the attorney facing you in the sandbox wants to portray, because they’ve got legal skills you don’t … yet. Our objective here is to keep the mortgage foreclosure mill’s attorney and his witness out of the sandbox (the courtroom) as long as possible … and when the time comes … how to kick sand in their faces (figuratively speaking of course)! It’s the only visual this author can really use to describe what you’re facing in today’s courts.

This author knows that retaining a foreclosure defense attorney is risky … and in this workshop, you’ll find out why that is so.

We will be providing you with extensive PDF files of court cases, diagrams, sample forms and pleadings and all the “stuff” you’ll need to study to empower you and your “game plan” while creating a Plan B exit strategy. The banks and their mortgage loan servicers would just love to see you out on the street, your valuables tossed to the curb by the Sheriff … something none of our online workshop guests want, especially with a virus running rampant.

In case you can’t attend the Saturday, October 24th online, 4-hour workshop, it will be available online at CloudedTitles.com shortly thereafter for your repeated viewing pleasure; however, we hope you’ll join us for the live event because you get to ask questions in our “chat box” about the tools we’ll be sharing during the event!

You must register in advance to get the link to the workshop the morning of the show, which starts promptly at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time!

Leave a comment

Filed under I'm not posting any more stuff on here!

FORECLOSURE DEFENSE 101 WORKSHOP NEWS! UPDATE!

(BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED) — The online webinar has been slated for Saturday, October 24, 2020 from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.  Please email cloudedtitles@gmail.com for a Registration Form. 

The latest news articles (at least 20 of which this author has read) all indicate that the COVID-19-related foreclosure crisis will more than likely affect low-to-middle income homeowners who lost their jobs, including first-time homebuyers, single women and people of color who got federally-insured mortgage loans.

Despite all of the CARES Act help and moratorium extensions by the government, conventional mortgage loans were not part of the government’s intended program to stop the tide of foreclosures that are looming in the not to distant future.  Because the crisis affected the mortgage loan servicers the worst, they are least likely to start granting en masse forbearances on mortgage loans as there’s no way they can recoup their losses fast enough.

The next game plan would seemingly call for mortgage loan modifications.  This is where homeowners can restructure their loans using money they’ve been able to acquire over the short haul in an effort to meet qualification requirement payments that the servicers will demand in order to complete the loan mod. Should these modifications not happen in droves, it will spark another massive wave of foreclosures before the end of 2020.  In this instance, it appears that the banks and their servicers are looking to the government for some sort of mitigation plan (in other words, another bailout, mitigation plan is just a nicer way of saying it).

As to the equity position some homeowners may have, restructuring could include downsizing through liquidation.  Because loan delinquencies will show up on credit reports, it will become more difficult for evicted homeowners to find places to rent through the standard screening criteria.  They will be faced with having to pay larger security deposits and higher rent because of their presumed risk having to go through back channels in order to find shelter.  In many metro areas, mortgage loan delinquencies of 30 days or more were over 10%.  This figure is very comparable to what America was facing in 2008 as over 10-million homes were foreclosed on in the years that followed.  The housing crisis we are now facing could nearly match what we experienced between 2009 and 2015.

IN FLORIDA, WE PREPARE FOR HURRICANES

There are some exceptions to the housing crisis in areas of the U.S. that have stable rent and mortgage markets.  Most of Florida and much of Texas fall into those two categories.  These two states, which this author is using as an example, have no state income tax and lower sales taxes and less restrictions on business, which makes them more desirable to those living under current “Blue State” conditions.  In many markets in Florida, residential resale inventories are declining, which seems to indicate the opinion that the 1000-people-a-day migration to the Sunshine State is impacting the crazy real estate boom.

However, a lot of homeowners who currently reside in both states are hunkering down and choosing not to liquidate, mainly because they can afford to ride out the storm, much in the same way homeowners in Florida prepare for hurricanes.  If you’ve ever been to Florida during hurricane season or have seen pictures of the parking lot that Interstate 75 turns into when those who aren’t prepared or those in low-lying areas who are forced to evacuate take to the roadways to flee the storm’s path, you can get a fraction of a glimpse of how many homeowners aren’t displaced and are going to ride out the storm because they’re prepared.  It’s just something you do when you live in Florida.  The problem is, not all homeowners have the financial ability to prepare.  Even though there are a lot of affluent folk living the dream, there are those groups of individuals and families that make up the support base (lower-paying incomes associated with health care, retail, restaurant and maintenance-related employment) are the ones taking the hardest hit in managing rent payments, which are skyrocketing beyond their ability to pay.  This is why there is a need for affordable housing in Florida, which is why this author is now building steel SIPS homes (Structural Insulated Panel System), starting around 900 square feet.  The need here for affordable housing is so great, even the news media can’t ignore it:

An affordable home that can withstand a category 5 hurricane? This builder says he has the answer | News | yoursun.com

This is what you call PLAN B … 

Having alternative plans to move to safer, more productive areas is part of why you’ll see demographic shifts of migration around the country.  When the construction industry booms in one area, workers from around the country migrate there seeking to become part of the construction labor pool.  There are all sorts of retraining programs available, if you know where to look.  America has always been resilient no matter what.  Even in light of the COVID-19 snafu, Americans are bouncing back … but unfortunately, not ALL Americans are.  It’s that 10% that make up the exception to the rule that will spark the crisis.

However, not everyone has a Plan B yet.  This is why we’re doing the Foreclosure Defense 101 Workshop.  California Attorney Al West has agreed to join me for this 4-hour webinar.  This author is also talking to others who have been able to stave off foreclosure for over 10 years, through learning HOW TO fight the mortgage loan servicers and their attorneys in court.  This of course, would be an exception to the rule.

We have made this workshop affordable and much easier to attend, as long as you have access to a computer and an email address.  This author has already addressed the types of sample forms we’re going to make available, so for the sake of redundancy, we’ll stop there.  If you or someone you know is in trouble, best to forward this post to them and/or have them email us at cloudedtitles@gmail.com for a Registration Form.   Here is the syllabus of what we’ll be sharing in the workshop:

FORECLOSURE DEFENSE 101 SYLLABUS

UPDATE:  Next week, you will be able to register to attend through our shopping cart on the Clouded Titles website

Leave a comment

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED

TEXAS GOVERNOR UNDER FIRE FOR CLOSING NIGHT CLUBS … AND OTHER STUFF, INCLUDING FORECLOSURE NEWS!

(BREAKING NEWS – OP-ED) — I’m including the latest breaking news, including foreclosure-related cases, for your review and rumination. 

News from the Lone Star State …

And the misinformation and disinformation continues, despite Texas’s Lt. Governor Dan Patrick telling Dr. Anthony “Flip-Flop” Fauci to shove it on FOX News.  See the video interview with Laura Ingraham HERE!   After seeing the number of patents Fauci has and will benefit from, you can certainly see my disdain in giving him a nickname, since he seems to be the “giant zit” on the rectum of all of the fecal disinformation that got everyone at each other’s throats (someone hand me another piece of ass-wipe … I seem to be out … everyone’s beat me to the supplies again).

The Texas Bar and Night Club Alliance filed a class action lawsuit, the second suit filed this week against Texas Governor Greg Abbott, for taking discriminatory actions against night clubs, claiming they’re hot spots for COVID-19.  The suit asks for $10,000,000 in damages and states that Abbott should have given the bars more than 24 hours notice before ordering them shut down, which was not the case this time and the lawsuit maintains that Abbott is abusing his emergency powers “without proper legal notice.”   The bar industry in Texas alone employs over 800,000 workers.  Florida’s clubs have also been shuttered unless they serve food more than 50% of the time.  In both states, salons and spas have been allowed to reopen, where bar owners claim the social distancing rules go right out the window because the salon stylists are touching the hair, scalp and face of the clients, regardless of whether they’re wearing a mask or not.

News from the Pot-Smoking, Open Carry, Gun-Toting State … 

Meanwhile, in Colorado, one restaurant owner defied her state’s lockdown orders, keeping her restaurant (which serves alcohol) open and fully running.  Lauren and Jayson Boebert kept Shooter’s Grill open despite a sheriff’s cease and desist order.  This isn’t an ordinary bar and restaurant either. It’s located in Rifle, Colorado:  CLICK HERE TO GET YOUR MIND BLOWN! 

The significant thing about the owner, Lauren Boebert (a Florida native), is that she just defeated a five-time GOP U.S. Congressman (incumbent) in the 3rd U.S. Congressional Primary in Colorado … CLICK HERE FOR THE VIDEO!  The 33-year-old restauranteur and mother of 4 faces off against Democratic challenger Diane Mitsch Bush in the November general election.  It never ceases to amaze me how the mindset of America is changing more in favor of not only protectionist as to a country, but protectionist as to its people.  Well … if you don’t know your rights, you don’t have any.

Just in case you missed it … 

For those who missed Friday night’s broadcast with Dr. Judy Mikovits on City Spotlight – Special Edition … you can listen to the broadcasts (both of them) under the Show Archives (under the FES Banner) for FREE, on the CloudedTitles.com website! You can’t make for a great argument against Flip-Flop Fauci without knowing the science!

In other related QAnon-type news … 

On yet even another note … this is a 45-minute video you might want to partake in if you have a bit more time: WATCH HERE! (It’s still on YouTube! WOW! … I got this video from one of my old school chums who’s an attorney in California!).  

Meanwhile, have you noticed that Bill Gates has been quiet of late and they just arrested Jeffrey Epstein (who didn’t hang himself)’s sidekick, Ghislane Maxwell?  Are we draining the swamp or what?  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 … senses working overtime!  (thought you might like to take a break from the “heavy” in favor of some happy music)

In foreclosure-related news … you’re going to love this case! 

In this instance, the alleged REMIC trust, which is nothing more than a glorified administrator for a cesspool of defaulted loans (and not really a REMIC), got its butt kicked in the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.  Read the case here: Wilmington Trust NA v Berry, 2020 ME 95 (July 2, 2020)

This is why you have to be sharp forensically, especially when it comes to the Rules of Evidence.

Let’s move up to the federal level, with another FDCPA “published” win for the homeowners! 

In this case, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau even got involved, submitting an amicus brief in a state whose courts just hate whiny homeowners.  Read the case here: Bender v Elmore & Throop, PC, 4th App Cir No 19-1325 (July 2, 2020)

And this is why we have Courts of Appeals … because U.S. District Court judges always seem to be pro-bank, pro-debt collection agency, pro-whatever as long as they get to play God for 15 minutes. Patience is more than a virtue, especially when it comes to an FDCPA claim.

And when both the lower court and court of appeals seem to play “pin the tail on the donkey” with your rear end, there’s always hope in the Supremes! 

And for yet another whammy involving Rules of Evidence, the hearsay rule and why it’s sometimes necessary to take the matter all the way up to a state Supreme Court, check out this case: Jackson et al v HFC III et al, Sup Ct Fla No SC18-357 (July 2, 2020)

And in my final stab at First Amendment freedoms … see the latest case where a high school went after a cheerleader-reject after she wrote “Fuck Cheer” on a Snapchat post … (hint, hint … the cheerleader won … go team!).  The amazing thing is this case was precedent setting …

B.L., a minor vs. Mahanoy Area School Dist, 3rd App Circuit No 19-1842 (June 30, 2020)_Precedential

But for all the headaches and legal expenses incurred by mommy and daddy, I would think it’s better to control one’s emotions, especially on social media, unless you’ve got a big bank account and a serious axe to grind.

So much for a bit of light reading, eh?

Happy 4th.  Stay safe.

Celebrate your freedom … while you still can!

Leave a comment

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED, Securitization Issues

THE TRUTH “UNMASKED” – UPDATE!

(BREAKING NEWS) — From the looks of things, most consumers are confused about what the COVID-19 mess has done to America.  Millions of people are out of work … and for what reason?   Millions of people are still on lockdown … and for what reason?    Tens of millions of people are “drinking the Kool-Aid” that the government, Big Pharma and the media is feeding them … and for what reason?

There are more and more conflicting statements coming out of the Centers for Disease Control, the World Health Organization and Dr. Anthony Fauci … people are already attacking each other for not wearing face masks when the folks not wearing masks are clearly in good health … more support to this argument can be found (watch the 9:44 video) HERE!  (Dublin, Ireland Professor Dr. Dolores J. Cahill, PhD confirms what Dr. Judy Mikovits has said on our broadcast and in her book!)  The attached article confirms a lot that what Dr. Mikovits has said … that taking the vaccine could be lethal and wearing a mask could also be lethal.

Here is some of what is coming out of the world’s scientific community to date:

  1. Wearing a mask should only occur if you are sick or taking care of someone who is sick, COVID-19 or not.
  2. If you are sick, stay home.  Be respectful of others’ rights and don’t be part of the spread of the virus you may or may not have.
  3. Healthy people who wear masks put their lives at serious risk. See the previous article and video.
  4. Employees who are forced to wear masks that get sick should have the right to sue their employers for putting them in harm’s way.
  5. Stores who force you to wear masks (because their respective owners or corporations “drank the Kool-Aid”) are putting everyone who enters their establishment at risk because the patrons are forced to wear masks.  This limits the number of businesses you can visit that force you to have to wear a mask. You should avoid businesses that force you to wear a mask as a condition of entering.
  6. You should be doing everything possible right now to boost your body’s immune system, which will help you fight any virus you are exposed to.
  7. You may have already had the coronavirus and not even have known it and your body’s immune system may have already built up an immunity to it.
  8. Being “asymptomatic” only means your body has successfully fought off the activation of the retrovirus because you didn’t have a pre-existing medical condition.
  9. The coronavirus has been around since 2003 … and it’s likely that if you got a flu shot, you were contaminated with the coronavirus, which is an XMRV (xenotrophic murine retrovirus), which means it was cultured in an animal or in dead fetal tissue.
  10. If you got a flu shot, the chances are 80% that you will test false positive for COVID-19.
  11. Because the antibody tests to determine coronavirus infection have not been fully vetted (rush to get them into the marketplace because of fear and demand), it is also likely that many who are not sick or “asymptomatic” will test false positive.
  12. The strains of the coronavirus will dry and die on surfaces when exposed to air.  They cannot live unless they are inside a human host.  They die quickly in the outside air. However, inside your mask, they are inhaled and end up in your brain.
  13. People who die from contamination by XMRVs do NOT die from the virus itself.  They die from the previous medical conditions which the retroviruses helped exacerbate.  Yet, in order to keep the fear level up in the population (to drive them all towards taking the vaccine) they are told that the deaths that have already occurred were due to COVID-19, when in fact, the autopsies that are performed post-mortem say otherwise.
  14. There has never been a vaccine created for SARS, MERS, coronaviruses.  What makes COVID-19 any different?  When the government rushes to judgment, people die.  This has nothing to do with Ruby Ridge, Waco or the Gordon Kahl incident.  It has everything to do with population control and depopulation of the world.
  15. Anyone who “drinks the Kool-Aid” supplied by the government, that accepts the vaccine, which has the XMRVs in it, are likely to die of pre-existing conditions as soon as their system becomes immuno-compromised (in other words … you get a common cold or the flu … or you’re taking heavy doses of anti-biotics).
  16. Big Pharma, Bill Gates and Dr. Anthony Fauci stand to make billions off of this vaccine once it’s out of production and being administered in the public.  The liberals and those conservatives (especially the elderly) will line up to take the shot and end up dying shortly after receiving it.  They will take the shot, mostly out of the fear conditioning by the government and the media.  This will help reduce the populations, making them easier to control.
  17. Whether the number of deaths or cases of COVID-19 have been manipulated are part of the “smoke screen” to instill fear in the population.  The more the population fears getting sick, the easier it is for them to take the vaccine … and yet, you have no idea what’s in it but you’re willing to let someone inject it into you?

If the government told you to jump off a bridge, would you do it?   If the government told you to hang yourself with a bed sheet because it was the “cool thing” to do, would you do it?  Why is it that most Americans are being blinded by the smoke screen and believing every single thing the government tells them?  How do we know that all of this diatribe is not intended to manipulate the behaviors of the public?

When the government demonizes someone who disagrees with it, the first thing I would do is look at what the demonization victim did to bring it about instead of believing everything the government and its spoon-fed media spit out.

Look at all of the brainwashed followers at Jonestown, Guyana who believed the Rev. Jim Jones and “drank the Kool-Aid”. Things didn’t work out too well for them, did they?

It’s dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.  People disappear and end up dead when they disagree with what the government says is questionable.  If they speak out, the government demonizes them so the general population will dismiss everything they have to say, just because the government says they’re crazy and attempts to “debunk” what they’re saying.  If enough scientists come out and say the same thing … and they’re challenging what the government’s intentions are … threatening to bring suit for forcing a vaccine on the public … it’s because these vaccines have not gone through rigorous testing and drug trials, which take years and years to perfect.  This has not happened and will not happen in this case.

PEOPLE WHO TAKE THE VACCINE THAT HAVE PREVIOUS MEDICAL CONDITIONS ARE LIKELY TO DIE FROM THE VACCINE! 

The government does not want to admit this.  Why would anyone risk death taking a vaccine just because the government (and everyone they’ve brainwashed) all points a  finger at them and calls them “unAmerican” for not taking it?   Why would the government potentially turn around and apply “choke points” to compel people to take the vaccine?  Here’s what I mean by “choke points”:

  1. You will not be able to board a plane or any other means of public transportation without proof of having taken the vaccine.
  2. You will not be able to enter a grocery store or any other publicly-occupied business establishment without proof of having taken the vaccine.
  3. If you were over 65, you could lose your Medicare benefits entirely, which means if you did get sick, you would get wiped out financially or die while trying to get medical attention when you have no insurance coverage.

Dr. Judy Mikovits, author of the book Plague of Corruption, will be our guest again on City Spotlight-Special Edition on WKDW-FM in North Port, Florida this coming Friday, July 3rd at 6:05 p.m. Eastern Time on kdwradio.com.

Dave Krieger and R. J. Malloy get “into the trenches” into the science with Dr. Mikovits about the fearmongering Americans are buying into (which appears to be a load of crap).  You can hear the 55-minute interview NOW (in case you missed it) on CloudedTitles.com website under the Radio Show Archives section (on the right-hand side towards the top of the page). This information is huge! We will be posting her second interview on the CloudedTitles.com website as well.

We are sure that after listening to the broadcast, you’re going to have questions.  Now you can post your questions on the blog or email them to me at cloudedtitles@gmail.com and I will ask Dr. Mikovits the question on our next broadcast on WKDW-FM, 97.5 in North Port, Florida.

Further, it would not be far-fetched to think that those who live outside of major metropolitan areas are less likely to be infected by anything, let alone a coronavirus. The statistics (even if skewed) prove that.  Those counties in America with less than 2-5 people per square mile have virtually no reported cases of COVID-19.

BTW, a second Plandemic movie is coming out soon, so now’s the time to get informed.

3 Comments

Filed under BREAKING NEWS