I do not know what the law schools are teaching regarding real property law, but here is an atypical case where one alleged lender used a quiet title action to prove a mortgage loan existed on a piece of property and a Maine Superior Court Judge chimed in … loud and clear … “what the hell were you people thinking?”

In the case of U.S. Bank, N.A., as Trustee for LSF8 Master Participation Trust v. Decision One Mortgage Company, LLC, (Superior Court, CV-15-65)(July 26, 2016), the Plaintiff (U.S. Bank) claimed it owned a note and mortgage, claiming the Defendant (Decision One), the originating lender on the note, was defunct and could not collect on the note.

The problem I have is, U.S. Bank didn’t get it right in Ibanez and they sure didn’t get it right here.  I mean, seriously, folks, using a quiet title action to prove up a note?  Seriously?  Someone either fell asleep in property law class or someone just is plain stupid in their legal analysis of this subject matter.

I have been trying to drum it into people’s heads that a quiet title action (when coupled with a request for declaratory relief) is used to determine who has superior title to any given piece of property … NOT to determine who owns the note with the right to enforce the terms of a mortgage.

Simply put … the court agreed with my teachings … not U. S. Bank’s attorneys!  It is sad that my consulting is now limited to attorneys litigating quiet title and will not be available (unless you read The Quiet Title War Manual) to the general public.

A quiet title action, as Al West and I so succinctly put it in the foregoing 512-page educational manual, is an action whereby you put forth a claim that you have superior title and request that the court determine the rights and interests of the parties as to “title”.  A note is an obligation created at the closing table and is not recorded in the public records, whereas “title” is recorded, by virtue of a deed.  The deed is your proof of ownership.

MERS, Securitization and Quiet Title

I don’t see MERS anywhere on anyone’s “deeds”, yet MERS thinks they have “legal title” to everything contained within a MERS-originated mortgage.  This is one of the reasons I keep telling people to “say NO! to MERS mortgages”.  Once you let this parasite in, you’ve just exacted hell upon yourself in unwanted legal fees, because the intent of the founders of MERS (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the banks) was to securitize your mortgage note (turn it into a security on Wall Street) and pander it to every ignorant investor who thinks that investing in securities is a “smart thing” to do.  I see nothing wrong with getting up and walking out of a closing where you are presented with MERS-related paperwork.  After all, by the time you get to the closing table, your note has probably already been sold at least nine times, WITHOUT YOUR SIGNATURE ON IT!  This is the big lie folks!

Say NO! to MERS!

If you think that your signature on a mortgage note is the start of the sale of the terms and conditions put forth under Paragraph 19 or 20 (depending on which long-form mortgage document you are signing), think again.  It doesn’t say WHEN the Lender may sell your note (or a partial interest thereof), as long as the Lender has your Form 1003 Loan Application.  When your loan application is submitted, it gets pandered all over Wall Street, along with your personal identifying information, in addition to being inputted into the MERS® System electronic database.  You make it all literally “legal” when you sign the mortgage and note.  But what if you didn’t?

What if you “woke up” and realized the MERS-originated Mortgage was a scam to steal your personal identifying information (your payment history, your credit scores and your personal information, e.g. social security number, date of birth … all the things these would-be thieves use to steal your identity) and you said NO! and got up and walked out of a closing?  What could the Lender do?

The REMIC trust rules allow for “qualified loans” to be substituted up to 90 days AFTER the trust closes, so that would be construed to mean that some other dumb sucker’s loan (who didn’t wake up like you did) would be put into the place occupied by your loan.  The REMIC itself contains a list of loan numbers (yet to be assigned, until you sign the paperwork) and these loan numbers mean nothing without “legal backing” behind them.

If MERS is shown on your paperwork (solely as a nominee), this failure of a beta business model will attempt to outsource and outspend you and cause you serious health problems (because of what it does to your chain of title) … and by the time all this happens, your title is too late to fix because no one knows who owns what … except that the title to the property is in YOUR NAME!   That is the for sure thing.

In the foregoing case, neither U.S. Bank nor Decision One was “on title”.  The homeowner’s name was on title. I didn’t see him filing the quiet title action, probably because of ignorance.  This is the fallacy being played upon the American public by the banks and it appears the banks themselves are drinking their own kool-aid.


Filed under Op-Ed Piece, Quiet Title Education



It pains me to have to read some of the posts on this blog, because I see that foreclosures are starting up again and many people are finding themselves without a clue as to what their odds are if they decide to fight, or not.  To that end, I’m posting my “Top 10” observations (not legal advice) here:

  1. You are not alone in your fight. Know that other homeowners are also considering the same options that you are, whether to “fight” or “flight” (run away, which 95% of homeowners do, spineless wimps).
  2. You will have to get rid of many ill-conceived misconceptions. Because we live in the “Age of Entitlement”, everyone thinks: (a.)  the bank did me wrong; and (b.)  I deserve a free house.  Wrong! You signed a contract and a security instrument!  No one held a gun to your head!  They dangled “the carrot” and you bit into it, hook, line and sinker!  You have to have a “Come to Jesus” meeting with you and your family and chuck all of these preconceived notions because without an open mind, you will dig yourself an even deeper hole!
  3. You have to understand that judges are homeowners too. Most of them probably still pay on a mortgage. This means you will have to understand how to overcome the conjecture and speculative arguments and derogatory comments that the bank’s attorneys (who have had years at this to perfect their craft) will make in court to sway the emotions of the judge.  You borrowed the money from someone, but maybe it’s not just “that guy”, your Honor.
  4. You at least have your day in court if you live in a judicial foreclosure state.  It really pisses me off when homeowners don’t show up in court and least say something!  You have your day in court as mandated by law, but sadly, 95% of homeowners freak out and run away.  The banks are counting on this. So are the courts. It’s a numbers game folks.  The less cases that judges have to hear, the better.  They know it.  I know it.  But you won’t know it if you don’t at least show up and say something!
  5. If you live in a non-judicial foreclosure state, you have to initiate proceedings to stop the sale of your home!  This means you either have to have a lot of time on your hands to do research or you will be like most of the 95% of homeowners who do nothing and wait for the county sheriff to show up and put you (and your family) to the curb.  Filing a Notice of Lis Pendens does nothing but “gum up” title temporarily.  Filing that means a “suit is pending” and if there is not suit, you filed a fraudulent document in the land records that could land you in jail, where you will do no one any good, especially those who depend on you for survival.  You are the Plaintiff and only a temporary restraining order will stop a foreclosure sale!  The burden of proof is on you unless you know how to turn the tables on the bank.  This is a fact, not legal advice!
  6. When it comes to foreclosure, apathy reigns supreme!  I have never seen a situation more tenuous where people become so in denial about life.  Instead of doing something about the scenario when it presents itself, many people go into this “woe is me funk”.  As a responsible American homeowner, that is really messed up.  Buying a home is one of the biggest, major decisions you will make in your life and most homeowners bit off more than they could chew (when credit was so readily available).  The banks are not all to blame.  They are crooks (true) … and I don’t trust them.  It’s bad enough that this election cycle gives us so little (the lesser of two evils) to choose from, but to have the banks controlling all of the behaviors of Congress and our presidents for the last two centuries is so appalling and what’s even more damning is that homeowners who have the power of the vote, do nothing.  So when you’re left with few choices in a time like this, remember, the collective body politic voted to set the system up this way.  The “system” has no mercy for those who think they’re “entitled” because someone else has to pay for it.
  7. The second wave of “foreclosure fraud” starts with unscrupulous foreclosure defense attorneys!  They’re out there and these are the types that want to make you their “monthly annuity”.  Foreclosure defense is big business and if you’re going to make monthly payments to an attorney to stave off a foreclosure, you’d better have an “end game”.  The real attorney will demand you have an end game before even taking your case and if you don’t have one, you’re likely to end up on the street anyway.
  8. Most people don’t even have an “end game”!  This is even more sad in a land where we have lots of hidden opportunities.  What I did when I looked at my own scenario, which I discussed in my book Clouded Titles, was to: (a.) examine my finances to see whether I could fight a foreclosure in the first place; (b.) look at my other options as to living scenarios (I had a rental property I could move into, which was becoming vacant, which made my choice easier); and (c.) I had to look at what if any equity I was giving up.  Most people took out 30-year mortgages.  I find 30-year notes to be a waste of time and money (in interest, which makes most of the 30-year period giving up little equity; just like renting).  I only do 15-year notes if at all anymore.  If you can’t afford the 15-year note payment, then rent! You may find yourself having a large yard sale and liquidating what possessions you don’t need and then using those proceeds to find yourself other “opportunities”.  The opportunities are there if you’d just look for them and stop whining about the dilemma you’re in!  If you think things are “hunky dory” right now, wait until the sheriff shows up and moves you out on the lawn.  Watch the “99 Homes” movie trailer if you want a real vivid picture!  (I still can’t watch it without tearing up and getting an aching feeling in my gut!)
  9. BOTH SIDES of the political aisle put this whole thing into motion!  If you think that either political candidate for president is the “right one”, think again.  When’s the last time you studied the Constitution?  If you read the manner in which the Founding Fathers set this country up, you would understand that Congress makes the laws, NOT the president.  Sure, the president may “influence” what laws get propounded, but the president’s job is to “enforce the law”, as the Chief Executive.  Congress voted to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act, not just one side or another.  The two-party system has failed us folks!  Your average congressperson is the bank’s “bitch” and has been for quite a number of decades!  The only way to stop this is to do what California and Illinois are doing to Wells Fargo Bank now … change banks!  The mega-banks got us into trouble in 2008 and nothing has changed.  Servicers are still robosigning documents and foreclosure mill attorneys are “in it up to their necks” in fraudulent documents in their reliance of such to steal borrower’s homes.   The whole thing has turned into one big criminal RICO issue and MERS is the platform, the business model, that facilitates it!  When homeowners wake up and smell what is really going on, AND DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, then things will change, not until.  I moved all my money and investments out of the major banks, why aren’t you doing that?   The big banks are your enemy!  The faster you realize this, the better.
  10. It’s hard to be right when the government is wrong!  The government bailed out the banks.  This was all an artificial ploy upon the American taxpayer anyway, as the banks paid the government back.  Those who screwed the government out of TARP funds are being (or have been) prosecuted and put in jail.  The government is in bed with the banks, otherwise, you wouldn’t have 12 USC (Banks and Banking) passed as law.  The banks are the most heavily-regulated industries in the country, but we disrespect ourselves when we stoop so low as to “borrow money” from them and dig ourselves in over our heads and makes ourselves destitute (by design).  Those who borrowed to pay for their education are now financial “slaves to the rhythm”.  Sorry, but the government’s answers to everything are Hegelian in nature and were put there to make you a slave.  I can’t help it that you didn’t do your homework!   No one taught you any better.  No one taught you finance in school.  No one told you that you had to read the damned documents at the closing table before you signed them and if you didn’t understand what you were getting yourself into, then it’s on you. However, the government allowed this mechanism to be put into place for a reason.  This is why Snowden is now in Moscow.  The only person who can change their life destiny is YOU! 

The other side of the coin with Wells Fargo?  I wonder … given the 2-million or so phony accounts they set up … how many mortgages did they rehypothecate?   Congress hasn’t even started looking into that.   Chase has a patented template for creating “ghost accounts” ( jp-morgan-chase-rehypothecation-2 ) … makes you wonder what’s really inside the databases of the DTCC and Cede & Co. huh?  I know from talking to other homeowners that dummy mortgage loans have been set up too, not just bank accounts.  Maybe Congress is turning a blind eye, maybe they’re just ignorant.  Don’t blame me. You elected them.  And this is why I don’t trust banks!  You are a fool if you think that your money is “safe and sound”!

So, the bottom line here is … not everyone’s strategy is the same as everyone came from different walks of life, has different resources available to them and can think clearly under pressure.  Put all your fears aside and analyze your scenario and come up with an “end game”.   I don’t want to see you end up in a tent city.



Filed under Op-Ed Piece

Deutsche Bank and Ocwen get nailed; jury says, Pay $400K!


After a week-long trial, a jury in Mobile, Alabama has decided that Deutsche Bank and Ocwen (“servicer fraud”) have stepped “over the line” and get to pay $25,000 in compensatory damages and $375,000 in punitive damages to an Alabama couple who they wrongfully foreclosed on!  See the printed story here: deutsche-ocwen-pay-400k!

Significantly, despite the fact I haven’t seen the actual case files, reports indicate that Ocwen (more than likely) was involved in document manufacturing, something I have asserted all along has been ongoing, even in light of the servicers’ settlement with the 49 states Attorneys General in early 2012!

This is impliedly what I call “document manufacturing for the purposes of litigation”, one of the two reasons the servicers, in conjunction with outside third-party document mills, crank out bogus documents that contain no proof of anything happening behind what’s stated on the documents.  They do this simply to create standing out of thin air and then use their phony standing to steal the borrower’s home!  The other reason is for the sake of convenience (like releasing old liens that are paid off with bogus, manufactured documents).  Just such a case has surfaced in Tampa, Florida and the parties are being served!  No assignment! Just a release by an entity using MERS when MERS wasn’t even involved in the original mortgage!

I brought this up in full detail in the OSCEOLA COUNTY FORENSIC EXAMINATION!  However, the United States government doesn’t give a shit whether the banks propound fraud upon the land records or not.  The outcome of the Forensic Examination’s investigation by the Osceola County Sheriff’s Department resulted in an innocent young man being tasered in what I believe was retaliation for his father being one of the examiners on the forensic investigation team and willful and malicious reporting by the Orlando Sentinel who could get their story straight if they tried. It has now come to light in an AP investigation that dozens of law enforcement personnel are being prosecuted around the country for illicitly accessing government databases to obtain information on “targeted individuals” without authority.   I wonder what the Sheriff’s detectives who I claim accessed the NCIC are thinking now that their boss isn’t running for re-election again?

This is the biggest lie of all … the lie that uses MERS to cover up an entire chain of misdeeds in the land records in every county all across America to say anything that the servicers want to say in order to distort the truth. This is why I opine that the MERS® System is nothing more than a business platform that facilitates criminal RICO, allowing the servicers use to do whatever they want with MERS’s name, so long as they hold MERS harmless from all liability.  This my friends, is an open-ended invitation to commit fraud!

I can go to any county in America and I will find the same issues in every land record that I found in Osceola County, Florida!  By virtue of the fact that MERS can get away with this sort of facilitation while homeowners are getting tossed out onto the streets wrongfully goes to the very core of the foregoing news article!  Juries are the only bodies of concerned citizens that can send a message.  I still want my day in front of a grand jury because I have a lot to show them!  It all revolves around the chain of title!   Tens of millions of property owners’ titles across America are affected!  This is systemic and Congress is doing nothing about it!

Remember that when you go to the polls in November!


Filed under Breaking News, Op-Ed Piece



The case of MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. v. Daniel and Darla Robinson is headed for the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Oral arguments are set to be heard on Thursday, December 8, 2016 in the Pasadena, California branch and California Attorney Al West, contributor to THE QUIET TITLE WAR MANUAL is now admitted to practice before the U.S. 9th Circuit and is slated to present the oral argument, at the insistence of the Robinsons.

If you are within traveling distance of the Pasadena, California branch, Al West has requested that you “pack the courtroom” for this event! 

There are several key issues here that are of national importance, which is what some judges are saying makes this case a national landmark case:

  1. where a federal judge has reversed a state judge’s ruling on a quiet title action, when the parties who claim an interest had a state court remedy to open up the judgment and challenge it and failed to exercise that right;
  2. where MERS and MERSCORP came in and accused the judge of being an “actor” in depriving MERS and MERSCORP of their civil rights; and
  3. where MERS and MERSCORP claimed they were entitled to notice, yet there is nothing in the Robinson’s Deed of Trust that entitles MERS to: (a.) notice rights; and (b.) assign any interest to anyone.


It is unprecedented that a federal judge would reverse himself and undo a quiet title action.  Needless to say, word has it that when the state judge found out that he was accused of being an “actor” because he “colluded” and “conspired” with Al West and the Robinsons to obtain a quiet title judgment, he was pissed!  Frankly, I don’t blame him.  Every other state judge should be worried as well … if the 9th Circuit deems that the state judge conspired with Al West and the Robinsons and allows this to stand, then every state judge in America can be overturned for any ruling by a federal court, just because some “shell” entity (or anyone for that matter) can come in and tell the court that their civil rights were violated!

That would also mean that anyone doing a quiet title action might as well forget it, because MERS and MERSCORP do not care about your property rights or your contractual obligation to defend title.  They do not care if your chain of title has been trashed or compromised, impairing its vendibility.  We’ve heard state judges even say, “The only parties that get to quiet title are the banks!”  So you know that the entire system is slanted in their favor because: (a.) judges are drawing pensions which are vested in these RMBS REMICs; and (b.) judges in this country are “bought and paid for” and there are very few judges that are standing up for the homeowner.

The Robinson case could end up in front of the United States Supreme Court because the circuits are split on what MERS is and isn’t allowed to do within the parameters of a contract.  The states themselves are split on what MERS is and isn’t allowed to do within the parameters of a contract.  Here’s some examples:

On February 10, 2011, in the case In re Ferrell Agard, New York Bankruptcy Court Judge Robert Grossman eviscerated MERS’s agency relationship in a scathing 37-page opinion, in response to affidavits filed by then MERSCORP Secretary William Hultman, who intervened in the case, trying to make an argument bolstering MERS’s authority to be an nominee and thus, an assignor/assignee of mortgages.  Negating that argument, Grossman wrote:

“The Court recognizes that an adverse ruling regarding MERS’s authority to assign mortgages or act on behalf of its member/lenders could have a significant impact on MERS and upon the lenders which do business with MERS throughout the United States. However, the Court must resolve the instant matter by applying the laws as they exist today. It is up to the legislative branch, if it chooses, to amend the current statutes to confer upon MERS the requisite authority to assign mortgages under its current business practices. MERS and its partners made the decision to create and operate under a business model that was designed in large part to avoid the requirements of the traditional mortgage recording process. This Court does not accept the argument that because MERS may be involved with 50% of all residential mortgages in the country, that is reason enough for this Court to turn a blind eye to the fact that this process does not comply with the law.”

One month later (March 10, 2011), the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department (in the case of Bank of New York v. Silverberg, Case No. 2010-00131, Index No. 17464-08) issued an opinion and order that went solidly against MERS, to wit:

“This matter involves the enforcement of the rules that govern real property and whether such rules should be bent to accommodate a system that has taken on a life of its own. The issue presented on this appeal is whether a party has standing to commence a foreclosure action when that party’s assignor—in this case, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (hereinafter MERS)—was listed in the underlying mortgage instruments as a nominee and mortgagee for the purpose of recording, but was never the actual holder or assignee of the underlying notes. We answer this question in the negative.”

That decision put New York State on the map against MERS in the appellate court level as well as in at least one bankruptcy court.  It should come as no surprise that Wells Fargo would later find itself in trouble with another bankruptcy court justice (Hon. Robert D. Drain) for using MERS in robosigning documents in favor of Wells Fargo, in an attempt to create fraudulent standing, based on a 150-page “foreclosure attorney manual”, instructing attorneys to simply contact Wells’s document manufacturing plant in Minnesota … and the folks there would just “make up an assignment out of thin air”, just for the purpose of proving up a proof of claim in bankruptcy court.  That case, In re Carrsow-Franklin, did not fair well for Wells Fargo when the debtor’s attorney, Linda Tirelli, exposed the attorney manual to the court.

 In Washington State, the decision in Kristin Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage Group of August 16, 2012 rendered a ruling from that state’s Supreme Court (Case No. 86206-1, consolidated with 86207-9) that MERS was NOT a valid beneficiary under the Washington Deed of Trust Act.

Shortly after the Bain decision, the Oregon Supreme Court decided the same thing in Niday v. GMAC Mortgage LLC and Brandrup v. ReconTrust Company et al … and ruled MERS was not a valid beneficiary under the Oregon Deed of Trust Act. Shortly after the two Oregon decisions, the Montana Supreme Court decided that MERS did not have the authority (as a nominee) to appoint a Substitute Trustee in the Pilgeram v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc. case.  These decisions were pointed out in the next paragraph.

On June 12, 2014, in a class-action lawsuit styled In re: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (No. 11-17615), the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a multi-district litigation panel set up in Arizona to look into the use of MERS in suspect fraudulent document manufacturing in a case in Arizona, reversing Count 1 of a federal appellate court ruling, wherein the Court opined (in 31 pages), the conflicts throughout the entire U.S. court system:

“There has been a wave of litigation in state and federal courts challenging various aspects of the MERS System. Almost all of the relevant law is state rather than federal. The results under state law have been inconsistent. See Weber, supra, at 246–56 (cataloguing the “schizophrenic position of state courts” on issues relating to the MERS System). Some state supreme courts have upheld the MERS System on issues ranging from foreclosure authority to recording requirements. See, e.g., Renshaw v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc., 315 P.3d 844, 846–47 (Idaho 2013) (holding that MERS may be a beneficiary as nominee for the lender, that assignments of the deed of trust between MERS members need not be recorded, that MERS was not liable to the borrower in negligence, and that the Idaho Consumer Protection Act did not provide a cause of action to the borrower); Jackson v. Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc., 770 N.W.2d 487, 501 (Minn. 2009) (holding that Minnesota law does not require recording of assignments of promissory notes among MERS members); Edelstein v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 286 P.3d 249, 252 (Nev. 2012) (stating that, although a split note and deed are not enforceable, under Nevada law “any split is cured when the promissory note and the deed of trust are reunified”); Bucci v. Lehman Bros. Bank, FSB, 68 A.3d 1069, 1081, 1083–89 (R.I. 2013) (holding that MERS had the contractual authority to invoke the power of sale and the right to foreclose and that Rhode Island law did not preclude foreclosure where the noteholder and the mortgagee were not the same entity).

Other state supreme courts have reached essentially opposite conclusions. See, e.g., Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Sw. Homes of Ark., 301 S.W.3d 1, 4 (Ark. 2009) (holding that, because MERS receives no payments on the debt, it is not the beneficiary, even though it is so designated in the deed of trust); Landmark Nat’l Bank v. Kesler, 216 P.3d 158, 166–67 (Kan. 2009) (“[I]n the event that a mortgage loan somehow separates interests of the note and the deed of trust, with the deed of trust lying with some independent entity, the mortgage may become unenforceable.”); Mortg. Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Saunders, 2 A.3d 289, 297 (Me. 2010) (holding that MERS lacked standing to foreclose as the lender’s nominee); CPT Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2004-EC1 v. Cin Kham, 278 P.3d 586, 592–93 (Okla. 2012) (holding that the putative noteholder lacked standing to foreclose because MERS lacked authority to assign the note, though it arguably had authority to assign the mortgage); Brandrup v. ReconTrust Co., N.A., 303 P.3d 301, 304–05 (Or. 2013) (en banc) (holding that MERS was not the “beneficiary” of a deed of trust under the Oregon Trust Deed Act absent conveyance to MERS of the beneficial right to repayment, and that MERS could not hold or transfer legal title to the deed as the lender’s nominee); Bain v. Metro. Mortg. Grp., Inc., 285 P.3d 34 (Wash. 2012) (en banc) (holding that “MERS is an ineligible ‘“beneficiary” within the terms of the Washington Deed of Trust Act’ if it never held the promissory note or other debt instrument secured by the deed of trust,” and that “characterizing MERS as the beneficiary has the capacity to deceive” and may give rise to an action under the Consumer Protection Act); see also MERSCORP, Inc. v. Romaine, 861 N.E.2d 81, 88–89 (N.Y. 2006) (Kaye, C.J., dissenting in part) (identifying concerns with the MERS system and “at least a disparity between the relevant statute . . . and the burgeoning modern-day electronic mortgage industry”).

Federal courts, applying state law, have reached similarly disparate results. Compare, e.g., Montgomery Cnty., Pa. v. MERSCORP, Inc., 904 F. Supp. 2d 436, 441 (E.D. Pa. 2012) (applying Pennsylvania law and holding that the County’s allegations that MERS violated recording statutes by failing to record assignments stated a claim for relief), In re Thomas, 447 B.R. 402, 412 (Bankr. D. Mass. 2011) (applying Massachusetts law and holding that “[w]hile the assignment purports to assign both the mortgage and the note, MERS . . . was never the holder of the note, and therefore lacked the right to assign it. . . . MERS is never the owner of the obligation secured by the mortgage for which it is the mortgagee of record”), and In re Wilhelm, 407 B.R. 392, 404 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2009) (applying Idaho law and holding that MERS is not authorized “either expressly or by implication” to transfer notes as the “nominal beneficiary” of the lender), with Town of Johnston v. MERSCORP, Inc., 950 F. Supp. 2d 379, 384 (D.R.I. 2013) (holding Rhode Island law does not require recording of assignments among MERS members); DeFranceschi v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 837 F. Supp. 2d 616, 623 (N.D. Tex. 2011) (granting summary judgment to defendants on plaintiffs’ claims that assignments by MERS were invalid and rendered foreclosure defective), and Moore v. McCalla Raymer, LLC, 916 F. Supp. 2d 1332, 1344–45 (N.D. Ga. 2013) (applying Georgia law and holding that, even assuming the plaintiff had standing to challenge the foreclosure on the theory that MERS assignments were invalid, that theory did not provide a basis for a wrongful foreclosure claim).”

The foregoing was used simply to illustrate the disparity in case law involving MERS, which is further reasoned as a necessity for the Robinson case to go to the nation’s highest court. The foregoing is also an understanding of what the 9th Circuit is thinking (and what MERS and its parent are up against) regarding said disparities.

A month after the 9th U.S. Circuit ruling, on July of 2014, in the Bank of America, N.A. v. Scott A. Greenleaf case, the Maine Supreme Court decided that MERS was a “mortgagee of record” and thus, was only allowed to assign that right, and no other, which brought foreclosures to a screeching halt (by roughly 65% according to attorney Tom Cox, who argued for Greenleaf).

In December of 2015, the Tennessee Supreme Court went further than any other Supreme Court in the U.S. in the case of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. Carlton J. Ditto, a pro se litigant who won rulings from the district, appellate and the Supremes … one of the only pro se litigants going up against MERS that I can find to accomplish such a feat.  In that ruling, which I have discussed extensively on this blog, MERS has no authority to do anything according to the Court’s opinion.

Many other states have sported decisions in favor of MERS because attorneys representing homeowners had no idea what they were getting themselves into, further allowing MERS to get its arguments admitted into the record without objection because these same attorneys had no concept of MERS’s business model.  Had these attorneys read Robert Janes’ “SHELL-GAME MERS, Contrived Confusion” BEFORE going into court, the outcomes may have been different!

My take on this … and I will be in court for the hearings on December 8th … is that no matter what this circuit decides, one or the other of these parties are going to take this up to “the big top”!  Once the U.S. Supreme Court decides whether our nation’s court systems should support a private entity, which I conclude were created to hide the misdeeds and snafus of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the sooner we can begin to identify and oust the legislators who put laws into place giving MERS credence anywhere in America.

The entire court system in America is at risk because of Robinson.  This author has is on good authority that the entire court system in the U.S. is watching this case with more than just simple interest.  The contract you sign at the closing table has everything to do with the arguments in this case, because a number of cases have been decided against MERS based on what the contract “didn’t say”.  I would opine MERS’s arguments are indeed “schizophrenic”, as the Tennessee Supremes ruled in Ditto.  We shall see.



Filed under Breaking News, Op-Ed Piece


BREAKING NEWS (from the poster)! 

For those of you who are planning to attend the Honolulu, Hawaii Quiet Title Workshop, please be advised of the following:

  1. This will be the last workshop of 2016 that Al West and I are doing together.  Either be there or miss out.
  2. This will be the last quiet title workshop that Al West and I are offering to the general public, due to lack of interest.  So, this is your last opportunity to have a powerful think tank at your disposal.  You can get the information on the workshop by clicking on the following links:
  3. QT WORKSHOP_HONOLULU_REGISTRATION FORM  (Please follow the instructions on the form!)
  4. QUIET TITLE WORKSHOP FLYER_HONOLULU  (I would recommend using discount hotel services to book your room and airfare, as our group discounts have expired!)
  5. I have decided to go a different direction involving my consulting work, which means I will be handling more attorney-based cases involving investors and homeowners who have retained counsel that is willing to accept consulting services; otherwise, I will only take cases on that basis.
  6. I am not a lawyer referral service; however, I can assist you in vetting attorneys, once you find them.  This will be done on a conference call basis for a flat fee of $75.00, payable by credit card in advance of the conference call.
  7. You can still purchase The Quiet Title War Manual, Clouded Titles and The Credit Restoration Primer from the Clouded Titles website.
  8. The online COTA Workshop is still in development and probably will not be ready until 2017.  If I become aware of any COTA Workshops being hosted by other entities in the future, I will inquire as to whether the folks who monitor this blog will be allowed to attend, at which point I will post the information accordingly.
  9. Any referrals to other consulting services outside of my immediate concern are the responsibility of those parties wishing to contact and contract with those services.  I no longer am working with outside parties who may or may not have further useful information to help you with your case.
  10. The rates on my COTAs now start at $1295.00 and go up from there.  I have a “full plate” and anticipate having a full plate for the next 3 years.  Despite what the banks, MERS and law enforcement have attempted to do in smearing me all over the media, with the help of a few self-proclaimed “investigators” who run  websites that state I ripped off the U. S. Government, I am still economically intact and am not going anywhere.  The Orlando Sentinel’s Henry Curtis got his story all wrong and was probably paid off by someone to write the article against the Osceola County Clerk in the first place, which makes his brand of journalism shoddy and unreliable at best, about as unreliable as you can get.  Any news outlet that would hire him would be a huge mistake and a disservice to the public at large. The current Osceola County Sheriff STILL isn’t running for re-election and the 9th Circuit State’s Attorney who refused to investigate the Forensic Examination commissioned by the Clerk was defeated in the Democratic primary last August.  The voters have awakened!

That being said … 

  1. I will still continue to post updated information on this site.  Once the online workshops are up, please note they are general in nature and are only there to help you formulate your research in conducting chain of title issues and will not offer legal advice, attorney referrals or any other subject matter information that is not relevant to chain of title.
  2. I will still continue to be the “foe” of MERS, MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. and the banks.  I am sick and tired of them and wish they were all in prison.  Unfortunately, the United States Government is in bed with the banks; yet the average, uninformed consumer still chooses to participate in impulse buying of homes they are NOT entitled to and cannot afford; thus, the same nonsense that plagued us in the 90’s and the millennia will continue to plague us for at least the next decade as the banks continue to water down the Dodd-Frank Act through their lobbyists.
  3. If you wish for Al West and I to come to your city to conduct a Quiet Title Workshop, there are firm parameters you will have to follow. You will have to guarantee 30 paid attendance for the event and the rate will be higher than what we normally charge to do a workshop and you will have to pay our travel to and from the event, plus meeting room and hotel rooms. No exceptions.
  4. I am still working on the FDCPA book.  This book is going to be a powerful think piece, in addition to all of the case citations, strategies and legal attack plans placed within this work, based on previous history of those who have been successful in such actions.  This has become the most formidable attack plan against the servicers and their law firms who lie in court about who they truly represent.  Yes folks, we are knee deep in servicer fraud.  In my estimation, the named plaintiff in a foreclosure suit does not know they’re the named plaintiff!
  5. The federal court systems (as well as the state court systems) are corrupt as hell!   Sure, there are a few judges out there that get it academically, but until you do your research and bring an adequate “game plan” to the table, all of the bad case law will continue to screw things up in the legal system because people may be mad, but they’re still unprepared financially and in all aspects of their education involving legal matters.
  6. Most attorneys have figured out how to scam homeowners for monthly payments and give them nothing in return.  I am still getting email from homeowners who are concerned that they may have picked the wrong attorney to represent them.  I am not an attorney referral service, but I have a few that I work with that I have found to be reliable.  If you have started your litigation pro se however, they may choose not to work with you.
  7. Please do not contact me about TILA and RESPA issues. That is not my focus.  There is narrow case law in these areas and you still aren’t going to get and free house, despite what anyone tells you.  I have been contacted by United States Treasury Agents regarding certain claims made by firms who tell consumers that all they have to do is file a rescission and they get a free house.  Unlike what happened to me 20 years ago, it is not me that is the target here.
  8. I will continue to do county land record audits.  If you know of someone who needs (or has indicated) they want one done, please let me know. If you’re in California, Al West will show the County Recorder how they can get a county land record audit done without the charges coming out of their budgets.
  9. Al West and I are still working on projects together.  Al West and I will be at the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals hearings on MERSCORP v. Robinson.  Yes, I authored quite a bit of the reply brief and I am very well aware (as MERS is) of the fact that MERS sent a mole in to bug our Las Vegas Quiet Title Workshop. I found out about that from information supplied to me that originated through a federal judge in Maryland. It would appear to indicate to me that the folks at MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. (and the U.S. government) understand that I am “not going away any time soon” … and if I do, it will be by their hand and their doing and not mine!  We are still coordinating efforts regarding certain AWL and ABC mortgage loans. We are also handling IRS Whistleblower cases!
  10. In certain matters, I may also be testifying in court. This still does NOT make me an expert witness. Please do not contact me to testify at your hearing or at trial.  If subpoenaed without my knowledge or consent, consider me a hostile witness ab initio.  I still want my day in front of the grand jury, be it state or federal.  I have a lot to tell them and show them.

Beware of whack jobs that continue to dwell on what happened to me 20 years ago.  As attorney Lynn Szymoniak eloquently put it … “it doesn’t matter what he did 20 years ago, what matters is what he’s doing now!”  If Ms. Szymoniak didn’t believe in what I was doing, she would NOT have shown up to my COTA Workshop to lecture to the class.  Please support The Housing Justice Foundation.

Finally, when I’m done with the FDCPA book, I am going to pick up where I left off and finish the “other book” I have been working on … a book which explains in detail what happened to me 20 years ago, the American legal system, American politics in general, and why Americans are becoming polarized in certain aspects of society.  The U. S. Government will definitely NOT like what is in this “other book” (although it’s not as dicey as “Snowden”).  If you get a chance to see that movie … this man should be exonerated and not indicted.  He just sent a warning shot to all of you out there that think you’re “secure” when you’re anything but.

No, I’m not a doom-and-gloomer.  Like many of you out there who are evaluating your future plans and strategies, that is a wise move in my book. Remember, the U. S. government is paranoid as a whole and government employees believe everything Uncle Sam tells them.  I have found trusts to be quite handy these days.



Filed under Breaking News, Chain of Title Education, Financial Education, Quiet Title Education