Tag Archives: Osceola County Forensic Examination


OP-ED — 

In March of 2012, all of the major servicers and the 49 States Attorneys General (except Oklahoma) inked an agreement wherein the servicers would stop the then-common practice of “robosigning” documents.  Six years later and it’s still going on.  I thought it best to clarify a few things before discussing where we are today.

Robosigning was a term referenced often by the late Kings County, New York Judge Arthur Schack, wherein he described the act of affixing signatures to documents in such a manner that: (a.) the signatures were illegible; (b.) the signatures could have been affixed by anyone [also known as surrogate signing]; (c.) contained information that was grossly distorted or misrepresentative [in HSBC v Taher_Schack, he noted that the address of the REMIC was at the same address as that of Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC in Palm Beach County, Florida], and now Ocwen Financial is acquiring PHH Mortgage, which was notorious for carrying on the same process that prompted the AG settlement.

Typical aspects (I call them “markers”) of robosigning include: (a.) scribbled signatures; (b.) varied signatures of the same name; and (c.) signatures different from the indicated name typed underneath the signature line.

Surrogate Signing came to light in the wake of the discovery of Linda Green, whose name was so easy to sign that everyone at DOCX was doing it: THE NEXT HOUSING SHOCK

As you may know, the President of DOCX ended up in Club Fed.  This conviction (of Lorraine M. Brown) was the only significant “slap on the hand” for bad behavior (of a document mill officer) that resulted in the loss of millions of homes in foreclosure actions through fraudulently-manufactured-then-publicly-recorded documents.

Typical markers of surrogate signing can be found on documents generated prior to 2012, that are commonly (and still) relied upon to tie together a chain of title for the purposes of “stealing” a borrower’s home.  Just because the borrower signed a note and mortgage doesn’t give the banking cartel the right to be sloppy about the way they followed their own procedures involving securitization (or the lack thereof).

Notary Fraud can occur in a multitude of ways.  Each state has specific regulations governing the commission of notaries public.  One doing any kind of research however, will need to pay attention to the regulations of certain states, which have (for all intents and purposes) watered down the obligations and governing regulations of notaries.  Some states do not require a notary bond.  Some states do not require notaries keep a journal of every notarial acknowledgment they perform.  Some states don’t even require that the notary physically witness the signature of the person executing the document.  What those in state government do not understand is that they are complicit in the very behaviors they put Lorraine Brown in prison for because local prosecutors do nothing to stop any of the foregoing behaviors for fear of putting their own political asses in a sling.

Some states (like California) require the notary to sign under penalty of perjury.  Perjury is a criminal matter, which can result in jail time.  Local prosecutors could easily make short work of handling a notary fraud case, simply by investigating the notary … it only takes one conviction to send a message … but they don’t.

As a “marker”, notary fraud could be the result of: (a.) acknowledging a signature that wasn’t affixed by the party claiming to have executed the document; (b.) acknowledging an execution when the party affixing their signature wasn’t present at signing; (c.) acknowledging an execution of a document as a party to a group of signers who routinely manufacture assignments of mortgage or deed of trust (similar to what went on in Simi Valley, California between 2012 and 2016 at Bank of America, N.A.’s robomill); (d.) participating as a notary in any document manufacturing scheme wherein the information placed within the document is false and misrepresentative and was placed there intentionally (civil conspiracy) wherein the notary was directed to participate as part of the signing process with the knowledge that what the notary was doing was illegitimate; and (e.) pre-acknowledging documents and affixing a seal with no signatures placed upon the document.

Self-Assignment is a common marker of the major banking institutions who can’t find paperwork, so they have their own employees (whether the major bank is servicing the loan or not) make stuff up out of thin air.  An example of this follows (with my analysis).  This is also included in the scheme of document manufacturing.

All of the foregoing “markers” are part of a scheme called “Document Manufacturing”

I talk about this extensively in the book Clouded Titles, which has undergone several updates between its original publication in December 2010 and its final “Mayday Edition” on May 1, 2016 because of newly-discovered information pertinent to investigations by this author through Chain of Title Assessments (COTAs) this author has conducted.

Document Manufacturing is the process by which multiple parties are retained by a mortgage loan servicer to act in a capacity of a bank official, using Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (on many an occasion) to further “dilute” the chain of title by obfuscating the path of ownership from the originating lender (many of which were bankrupt and out of business at the time the document was executed) to the current “alleged” owner of the mortgage loan.  Most of this process takes place within ninety (90) days AFTER a borrower allegedly stops making their mortgage loan payments.  Customarily, most of this scheme takes place within the walls of the mortgage loan servicer’s own document manufacturing plant or at a contractor-based, third-party document mill.

The scheme may involve witnesses also attesting to the signature of the alleged “officer” signing the assignment. Many times, these witnesses are notaries (who should know better).  Many times, these witnesses simply sit around the signing table, shuffling documents from person to person, all affixing their signatures to a pre-determined spot on the document.  All of these documents are then bundled up and taken to a different part of the building and placed on the desk of a notary who will then acknowledge the documents and affix the notary seal to each one, claiming the signers “personally appeared” before them, when in fact, THAT did not happen!

The scheme is designed to place everyone in the manufacturing chain at better than “arms length” away from the servicer, as a means to reduce liability.  This would bring this author to an obvious conclusion that it would be more difficult to seek out and depose those who participated in the scheme because of costs and time involved, making it virtually impossible to defend one’s property from theft by document fraud.

AND HERE IT IS … 2018 … AND …

… we still have not gotten past being dishonest about providing solid proof of effective transfer of the promissory note in conjunction with an assignment of a mortgage or deed of trust.

As the result of the OSCEOLA COUNTY FORENSIC EXAMINATION, we learned that having local law enforcement investigate matters of this nature was way over their heads (let alone their pay grades).  They are either in denial or superbly arrogant about having to investigate what they said were “victimless crimes”.  The investigation involved the examination of documents in the land records from June 1, 2012 (after the AG settlement was reached) and June 1, 2014 (a 2-year span).   Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. was used as a research guide, because it led the examination team directly to all of the securitized RMBS documents, which contained continued patterns of everything I’ve described in this article.

As a means of education (because I can’t give legal advice) … let’s examine a couple of recently-filed documents:

In Osceola County, Florida, where we previously conducted an examination of their land records, paid for with Osceola County taxpayer dollars, I happened to find this recently-manufactured self assignment:

In the foregoing instance, I analyze the following suspect issues for your evaluation: 

(1.) This assignment of mortgage was done by JPMorgan Chase Bank’s own employees in their document manufacturing plant in Monroe, Louisiana on January 10, 2018.

(2.) The document could have been executed to Chase by Standard Pacific Mortgage, Inc., without the use of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as Standard Pacific Mortgage, Inc. is still in business in Irvine, California. Why then did Chase employees, in a civil conspiracy with Nationwide Title Clearing, Inc. in Florida, have to then create this document?  Why didn’t the originating Lender create and execute the document?

(3.) If you’ll notice, “Judy G. Jackson”s printed name appears to have been inserted into the document by the party creating AND executing it.  The notary did not even fill in the space provided.

(4.) In this instance, the notary claims that Judy G. Jackson was “personally known, who did say that he/she/they” (the notary is too lazy to delineate for gender and plurality to make the document appear more legitimate). Nowhere in the document does it say that Louisiana Notary Amy Gott, who has a lifetime commission, actually “personally witnessed” Jackson’s signature.

(5.) There is no proof of authority anywhere on the document, indicating that Jackson had the authority to execute the instrument, which was signed on January 10, 2018.

(6.) The document misrepresents the mailing address for the lender as that of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s post office box in Flint, Michigan.

(7.) Notice that the Assignment of Mortgage ONLY “conveys” the Mortgage (and NOT the Note)?

(8.) The document was further obfuscated by the return address (after recording) as that of Nationwide Title Clearing, Inc. (“NTC”) in Palm Harbor, Florida (one of the companies targeted as a third-party document mill in the Osceola County Forensic Examination).  Why send it to NTC in the first place, unless NTC had something to do with its manufacture?

(9.) Notice the 1999 corporate seal for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.?  The employees at JPMorgan Chase Bank misrepresented their authority using “MERS” to obfuscate the chain of title.  NTC obviously has a document manufacturing, archive contract with Chase, which could be further played out through discovery.

(10.) You will notice from doing your own research that the use of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. to obfuscate the chain of title with a “place card-type” position of the “nominee” (agent), has been used for so long that our very own United States Government and County Clerks and Recorders (who are blind, or reprobate, or both) simply choose to let this lie proliferate.


In the foregoing instance, I analyze the following suspect issues for your evaluation: 

(1.) This assignment of mortgage was done by a third-party document mill in their document manufacturing plant in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on February 21, 2018.

(2.) The originating Lender (IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., now out of business) obviously used Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. to transfer its loans within the MERS® System via the use of a third-party mill, who couldn’t even be bothered to put the 1999 Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. corporate seal on the document.

(3.) If you’ll notice, the party signing the document is using a non-designated “official title” for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.?   Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. only allows signers to use the titles of “Assistant Secretary” or “Vice President” (not as shown).

(4.) The pre-printed document contains the name of the signer in the notarial execution in all capital letters, which means it was inserted into the document using computer software.  The signer couldn’t even sign her own name in full.

(5.) Geez … every other Florida assignment I’ve seen had two (2) witness signatures contained within the document.  I guess these third-party doc mills don’t care if they follow Florida law or not, right?

(4.) Knowing how third-party document manufacturing plants behave, I would debate the use of the words “personally appeared”, given what we know about signing plant floor plans.

(5.) There is no proof of authority anywhere on the document, indicating that Salicce (the signer) had the authority to execute the instrument in that capacity, let alone have personal knowledge of its contents (robosigning).

(6.) The document doesn’t even list the mailing address for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., even though it claims to have an interest in the Assignment (as the “Assignor”) … pretty blatant huh?

(7.) Notice that the Assignment of Mortgage ONLY “conveys” the Mortgage (and NOT the Note)?

(8.) Notice that since IndyMac was out of business, a third-party document mill had to use Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. to obfuscate the chain of title to convey the mortgage (ONLY) into the REMIC directly, which by the way, had a cut-off date of June 1, 2005 and a Closing Date of June 15, 2005, in violation of the governing regulations for that REMIC, which can be found here: http://www.secinfo.com/dqTm6.z1en.htm.

(9.) Also notice that the name of the REMIC is incorrectly listed.  According to SEC records, the official name of the REMIC is the Indymac Home Equity Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Trust, Series Inabs 2005-B.  As far as I can see, there are are least three (3) distinct misrepresentations under Florida Criminal Code § 817.535 in the forgoing document.

(10.) Do we have possible notary fraud here?   Do you not see in the notarial execution where the notary claims to have acknowledged that Salicce (an employee of Visionet Systems Inc.) was an “Assistant Vice President” of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. when in fact, there is no such designation?  And from the scribbled signature of the notary, is it possible she executed this document without the signer being present and does this often enough to get writer’s cramp signing scribbled signatures a lot?  It might merit requesting her notary application from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to see if that signature (on her application) matches the signature on this document.  Also notice the acknowledgment says nothing about “personally appeared” either.

By the way, the bold-faced type you see in the foregoing assignment is part of the boiler-plate software template used by document mills to create these suspect documents.


If you think that the foregoing behavior only applies to assignments, you should look at Releases of liens as well. Of particular note is the issue of potential unauthorized practice of law, which is a felony in Florida and most other states, for executing and recording documents known to contain false information (perjury) without attorney supervision.

I have successfully participated in removing (by expungement) a bogus Release of Mortgage out of the land records in Hillsborough County, Florida and the existing “alleged pretender lender” has absolutely no idea it now has a competing lien ahead of its foreclosure attempts.  This is why foreclosure law firm attorneys are so imbecilic when it comes to “getting their story straight” when they try to foreclose on a mortgage without FIRST checking the chain of title for competing liens … which brings me to my next point:

Any lawyer for the banks that comes into court and regurgitates these misrepresentations is likely to have committed not only felony perjury and potential multiple ethics violations … but any subsequent law firm will not be able to continue their tirade on the property once the initial violations have been exposed.

Perhaps it is now time to go after the foreclosure mill lawyers instead of just their clients!

My final parting shot goes against the state district and circuit attorneys who refuse to criminally prosecute these people.  Don’t yell at me!  You elected them!  You and I can both probably think to ourselves what worthless POS these people are if they aren’t going to do what’s right.

If you don’t know your rights … you don’t have any!

Dave Krieger is the author of the book Clouded Titles and has a weekly radio show on WKDW-FM in North Port, Florida covering consumer issues. He serves as a paralegal and chain of title consultant to attorneys as well as performs chain of title assessments for consumers as well as  forensic examinations and audits of county land records, despite the fact he is a disenfranchised citizen of whatever you want to call this economically messed up country you live in.

Coming soon … How to deal with the next financial collapse in America! 



Filed under OP-ED



Several media outlets, including the Daily Business Review, Miami New Times and Law.com are all reporting that the two Ditech Financial LLC attorneys are slated to face Miami-Dade Judge Beatrice Butchko on February 1, 2018, pending their appeal to stop the proceedings.

Miami-Dade Judge Beatrice Butchko

Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Beatrice Butchko ordered a non-jury trial date (which amounts to a “trial to the bench”, similar to foreclosure proceedings where a judge gets to rule unilaterally instead of the matter going to a jury of peers) for February 1, 2018, where Florida attorneys Yacenda Hudson and Amina McNeil have to show why they should not be held in criminal contempt of court for not producing Ditech manuals which explain the company’s record-keeping processes, which the lawyers finally did produce for opposing counsel, Bruce Jacobs of Jacobs-Keeley, a prominent Miami-Dade law firm this blog poster is directly familiar with.

Jacobs, himself a former prosecutor, has chastised the behavior of Hudson and McNeil and their witness from Ditech, Christopher Ogden, who Miami-Dade Circuit Court Judge Pedro Escharte, Jr. has implied “gave false testimony in an effort to introduce the prior servicer’s records into evidence under false pretenses.”

Amina McNeil, Tromberg Law Group

Yacenda Hudson, Tromberg Law Group

Hudson and McNeil have hired their own lawyers, who filed multiple motions in an effort to derail the upcoming hearing.  If the attorneys are found in contempt, Judge Butchko has threatened referral to the Florida Bar, which could take up the matter for disciplinary actions against both lawyers.

Jacobs has characterized the opposing counsels’ behavior as an “attack on the integrity” of the court system.

The entire matter revolves around the “loan boarding process” over a property in West Kendall, Florida, where Jacobs demand that Ditech produce its manuals, which Ogden stated to the court contained company mandates about how processes in servicing of loans were to be conducted.  As it appears, those manuals say nothing giving credence to Ogden’s testimony in Escharte’s court about accuracy-checking processes that Ogden claimed existed.  Judge Escharte claims the company willfully lied in court to protect itself; however, the outcome in equity was that it sought to steal someone’s home by whatever means necessary.  Does that sound familiar to any of you?

It further appears that the “bugs” in the relationship between Ditech and the servicer it acquired, Green Tree Servicing, have come home to infest Ditech with more serious issues, which other attorneys and litigants could learn from.  The articles also mention a similarly-flawed process in loan boarding conducted by Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, which Judge Butchko characterized as “legal fiction”.

Anyone facing Ditech or Ocwen in court should now be able to use this flaw as an attack strategy in their own cases. Any time that either of these two entities bring their servicer representative to court to testify, all one would seemingly have to do is a little research into what questions to ask to tie them up into a nice, neat, little bow, to be set on fire later when they can’t produce the documents they’re relying on.

What the court systems in Florida are sadly just now coming to recognize is that the crap that we’ve known about in document manufacturing, robosigning and drafting up bogus powers of attorneys and corporate resolutions to cover up the banking industries lies have been ongoing since securitization kicked into high gear at the dawn of the new millennium.  To me, the rest of the justices across the country are either in denial or they’ve been bribed to go with the flow.  What goes around comes around.  Karma’s a bitch!

For more details, click on this pdf: Criminal Contempt Proceedings Go Forward Against Boca Raton Attorneys | Daily Business Review

I posted the attorneys’ pictures in this blog post in case you happen to face them in court … I don’t think I have to tell you how to proceed when they’re the opposing counsel.  Know thine enemy whilst thou art in the way with him …

For those of you who wish to see more evidence of fraud and misrepresentation on the court, click this pdf:


Happy Holidays from Clouded Titles Blog!



Nothing has changed much in Washington State, post-Bain!

Op-Ed —

August 16, 2012 is a day that will go down in Washington State’s history when it comes to dealing with the issues created by the licensed lenders in that State who rely on MERS to cover up “dead spots” in the chain of title to properties.  I’m attaching the Supreme Court’s en banc ruling to refresh your memory and to fill in any gaps that might be missing in your thought process.


Only a handful of states in the union agreed with the Washington Supreme Court’s decision insofar that MERS was NOT a real “beneficiary” because it didn’t loan any money and therefore, had no interest in the borrower’s promissory note.  In fact, during the oral arguments presented before the Supreme Court, counsel for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (not “MERS”, which means MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.; I’ll explain in a moment) could NOT identify WHO owned Kristin Bain’s mortgage loan! That didn’t bode well before the justices, who were stunned at the lack of knowledge and almost sheer arrogance of MERSCORP’s counsel.

You see, what the Washington State Supreme Court justices were never presented with, and thus did not have in evidence to be able to make a determination of, is that the Rules enacted by the parent of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. (then MERSCORP, Inc.), specifically note that under Rule 1 § 1, when the term “MERS” is used, it means the PARENT, NOT THE CHILD!  Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. is THE CHILD. The lack of knowledge by the attorneys for the homeowners (for Bain and Selkowitz) and the deliberate omission of MERS’s own “rules” by its representative counsel should be cause for alarm in the way cases are being litigated all across the country!


In fact, they are two distinctly separate Delaware corporations. This was a contrived scheme of mass proportions, created in favor of the banks, which caused tens of millions of fraudulent and misrepresentative documents to be recorded into the land records of all 3,041 counties, townships and boroughs in the United States, literally clouding titles to over 80-million properties!

Thus, when Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. shows up in any legal proceeding, it’s the “empty shell” (a bankruptcy-remote entity with no assets or liabilities; no income or expenses; and no employees) that shows up in court … NOT THE PARENT!  MERSCORP is footing the legal costs in every proceeding (because it is a roughly $2.7-billion a year business model) that operates and argues on the flawed idea that the agent (nominee) and the beneficiary can be one in the same party.

The Tennessee Supreme Court completely gutted the MERS business model in the Ditto decision. MERS v DITTO_TN Supreme Court rules against MERS!  To NOT understand all of the basic tenets of real property and mortgage law could be fatal to you in your foreclosure case!

This is why I am hosting the Foreclosure Defense Workshop in Orlando on September 30-October 1, 2017.  (see below)

Part of the “good fight” in dealing in foreclosure actions is knowing the truth and how to find it (or go after a determination to get at it).  This is a lot of what we are teaching in the workshop, even if you’re going pro se!

You have little time to make reservations, because airfare is going up the closer you get to the date and the number of seats to the event has dramatically shrunk.  If you are even thinking of remotely preparing yourself to “fight the good fight”, you need to be at this event!  Since Hurricane Irma hit Florida and knocked out a lot of the internet connections, many Florida consumers won’t know about this event until this weekend and likely, there will be an onslaught of registrations at the last minute.


Meanwhile, back in Washington State … 

It appears that the regulatory agencies that govern the behavior of the banks aren’t falling all over themselves to stop the continual process of recording documents in the land records that makes use of MERS as a “beneficiary”, post-Bain.  Here is one such Consent Order, issued in 2017, that exemplifies my point (sent to me by one of the readers of this blog):

Planet Home Lending

The Consent Order appears to have noted that a violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act [RCW 31.04.027(2) and (13)] occurred when Planet Home Lending, a lender licensed under Washington law to conduct business in the State, caused several Assignments of Deeds of Trust to be filed in counties all across Washington State, post-Bain, characterizing MERS “as the beneficiary when MERS did not hold the corresponding promissory note.”

While I was not provided with any specific Assignment to review, I would guess (and my guesses are usually pretty right on) that the Assignment was created by employees of the servicer of the loan. Recognizing this scenario is important for two key reasons:

  1. If a consumer is economically affected by the recording of one of these subject, suspect Assignments, the consumer would have to assert a specific violation of the foregoing state statutes; and
  2. If the Assignment of Deed of Trust used MERS to characterize the Assignor as a “beneficiary”, post-Bain, for the purposes of transferring any rights in the note to a REMIC, or even more importantly, to the servicer, who then commences a foreclosure action against the Property, then there may also be a violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 1641(f) and (g), the Federal Consumer Protection Act.

Through the use of the federal citation, the case then becomes a federal issue, so one would have to get a competent attorney to sort through which would be more effective to prove (as a Plaintiff) against Planet Home Lending, the violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act (which has a supporting Consent Order to apply to the case as evidence) or the Federal version of the same.

The problem is however, that the Consent Order implies that Planet Home Lending didn’t admit to guilt, even though the State found violations of the foregoing Act (under Agreement and Order Paragraph C). For all intents and purposes, the Order basically said, “Don’t do it again!” and by agreement, any further violations of the Order would be dealt with in the future (to what extent, we do not know).

Now, I can surmise that all of the litigious folk out there affected by the issuance of this Consent Order have realized that there is nothing stopping a consumer from bringing a private right of action against Planet Home Lending (or any other lender or servicer violating the Washington CPA). However, I caution those considering such to use due diligence in determining “damage”, whether actual, compensatory, exemplary or punitive.  Without some sort of financial loss, it may be more difficult to press forward with a CPA violation claim.

That being said, it appears that suit may be brought under the foregoing state statutes in lieu of any decision like Yvanova v New Century Mortgage Corp. et al (California) and Miller v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, 726 F. 3d 717 – Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 2013 – Google (Texas) that gives consumers the right to challenge the creation of (and subsequent recording of) a suspect document affecting chain of title in the land records of any county in Washington State.  This may also apply in other Consumer Protection Act-related statutes across the country, but it is likely that a consumer would have to conduct some pretty specific discovery (against the mortgage loan servicers’ employees and notaries) to see who ordered the creation of the document and who caused it to be manufactured, for what purpose and determine accountability.

It should also be noted that civil conspiracy is defined in virtually every state statute.  While this term does not in of itself, constitute a cause of action in the literal sense, the act of one or more actors getting together and conspiring to do a thing to scheme that adversely affects the economic or financial well-being of another would certainly be an issue to be considered.

In Florida, for example, Florida Criminal Code § 817.535 makes it a third-degree felony to record a document containing false and misrepresentative information with the intent to deprive another of their property.  While consumers cannot commence criminal proceedings directly, they can file a criminal complaint with the local sheriff’s department (the county land records are the sheriff’s jurisdiction) and pursue a criminal case that way, especially if discovery shows that a civil conspiracy to create the document indeed occurred. You should understand that (based on our past dealings with a certain sheriff’s department) detectives at the county level are either lazy, in defiance of or lack the knowledge to properly and fully investigate such matters, as evidenced by the Osceola County Sheriff’s Department, who could find no wrongdoing in the OSCEOLA COUNTY FORENSIC EXAMINATION.

The foregoing subject matter is only PART OF what we’re going to cover in the upcoming Foreclosure Defense Workshop.  Thus, the tools and weapons that pro se litigants and litigants being represented by counsel are being refined to be more effective and the means by which documents are challenged has also been refined (AND PROVEN) to work!  There are three specific things I’m going to be sharing at the workshop in this regard, in addition to the newly-developed tactics by Rich Kalinoski, the attorney lecturing to those attending this workshop.

Again, this is the ONLY workshop we’re doing in 2017.  We have not decided whether we’re going to do another workshop again. Rich is very busy implementing his new developments and for this reason, may stifle any efforts to conduct a workshop in the future.  Know this … legal tools will be available to all of those who attend!

In the meantime, keep researching and “fighting the good fight”.

Dave Krieger is the author of several books, including Clouded Titles, available on his website.  He consults attorneys in foreclosure matters and drafts pleadings and conducts research for attorneys and litigants. Mr. Krieger is Managing Member of DK Consultants LLC in San Antonio, Texas. 



Leave a comment

Filed under OP-ED, workshop

MERS and its “Parent” are trying to invade Oregon again, despite Supreme Court ruling!


For those of you in Oregon, you should be writing your legislators, especially the ones who are trying to pass the following Senate Bill (968), which would put MERS back into legislative existence again in Oregon, despite the Oregon Supreme Court’s rulings in Niday and Brandrup:

SB 968 (Oregon trying to legislate MERS into existence again)

This just goes to show you that MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., who, along with several major banks, settled a $9-million lawsuit brought by Multnomah County, is now trying to do an “end run” to get itself legally back in the game, this time using the Oregon State Legislature.

It’s time to start “ramping up” against those sponsoring the bill!

Anyone want to retain a private investigator to dig up dirt on (taken from the top of the bill):

Senator JOHNSON, Representative OLSON, Senator HANSELL; Senators BAERTSCHIGER JR, FERRIOLI, Representatives BARKER, CLEM, WITT?

If anything, legislators don’t like seeing smut printed about them on the Internet.  It’s bad for politics.

However, what they are attempting to do is BAD for Oregon homeowners.  The Oregon Supreme Court already made it clear they didn’t want MERS being a nominee or a beneficiary in the State of Oregon. What part of that don’t these legislators get?

It’s called bribery! 

I know.  Harsh wording … but MERS and its parent are paying someone somewhere, through lobbyists, whatever, to put this legislation into effect so it can continue to f**k Oregon homeowners as part of a renewed securitization effort.  I want to see them all in prison.

As to the OSCEOLA COUNTY FORENSIC EXAMINATION … we are not done yet.

This author is not going to stop ranting on MERS and its band of delusionary Board of Directors, who think that the legislature in every state should accord a private entity its own legislation to ply its flawed business model on Americans, most of whom don’t have  a clue as to what is going on.  I personally think these Oregon legislators are on the “take” and so should you!   Time to start making phone calls, if you get my drift, especially if you live in Oregon. These legislators need to be “exposed” for their wrongdoing.

This also goes to show you that with Fannie Mae lowering its borrowing standards, investors are about to get bufu’d again by the major banks.  One would think that with all of the investor lawsuits going on that it should be very clear that the securitization system implemented by and through the major banking cartels are out to destroy the “full faith and credit” of each of us, one home at a time!




Filed under BREAKING NEWS, Securitization Issues


Op-Ed Post —


Of late, this blog and its author have been scrutinized and belittled to the point of frustration, based on the spate of comments received by some not-so-well-meaning bloggers.  Apparently, there are still some out there that believe everything they read in the newspaper or watch on TV regarding the handling of the investigation into this Report and they continue to send me disparaging comments about the invalidity of the investigation.  Well … despite the Doubting Thomases, I’m not going away.

To dispel some of the gossip and hearsay regarding the investigation of this Report, this Author would posit the following:

(01) Then-Florida 9th Circuit States’ Attorney Jeff Ashton wouldn’t touch the report with a ten-foot pole because he regarded it as a political hot potato.  As it turns out, he would rather play on AshleyMadison.com and cheat on his wife on company time and later attribute it as an “error in judgment”.  Ashton’s own investigator, Eric Edwards, told this author in a phone conversation that if he had the budget, he would investigate the details of the Report because he read through the first few pages and thought the Report had merit.  The investigator himself told this author even he (Edwards) was having issues with his mortgage and suspected something was wrong.

(02) U.S. Congressman Alan Grayson always has, and still does, support this report … and he is an attorney who OWNS a hedge fund.  He saw the corrupt patterns outlined in the Report. He has read the entire Report, with exhibits, from start to finish, and was convinced that it was factual in detail.  Grayson accompanied Armando Ramirez, the Circuit Clerk of Osceola County to the meeting with Jeff Ashton, who was quick to suggest that the chain of command be followed and turned the matter over to the Osceola County Sheriff to investigate. “Fox guarding the hen house.” “Kick the can down the road.”  We have no idea what instructions accompanied the shipment of the Report to the Osceola County Sheriff’s Department.

(03) During the pending Osceola County Sheriff’s investigation of the Report, two of the detectives met with this author, California Attorney Al West (who was also present during the investigation and supervised much of it) and Osecola County Forensic Auditor Hector Acosta (who ran point on the set-up of the examination). The date was February 9, 2015.  Within about ten minutes of the meeting, things got ugly and turned into a heated conversation, wherein the County Attorney (whose law firm represents noted insurance companies) got into the act, advising this author that, by law, he had to divulge the names and whereabouts of all the examiners, something this author refused to do.  Hector Acosta’s step son was tasered on his own front lawn at 3:45 a.m. after arriving home (sober and drug-free) with a relative, as he was going to bed, in what Acosta and this author think was retaliation for furthering the promotion of the Report as well as support for the local homeowners’ justice group.

(04) There was an attorney present during the investigation by examiners and an attorney opinion letter accompanied the forensic examination.  Both the Orlando Sentinel and WFTV Channel 9 overlooked that fact. Matt Weidner was all too quick to condemn the Report, not knowing that two attorneys had a hand in its preparation and final opinion and that it was not this author himself, attesting to the contents of the Report.

(05) Sentinel reporter Henry Pierson Curtis was quick to report that  the Osceola Clerk hired the author and his team without putting the examination out for bids. Had Mr. Curtis checked his facts, he would have found out that the Level 3 Threshold for retention of contractors was permitted so long as the payment was under $35,000.  Besides, who else is going to conduct as extensive a forensic examination of those records, John Wright or Steve Dibert?   Matt Weidner?   How many other firms have the background to analyze fraudulent documents?   If you want to use the phrase “it takes one to know one”, then I guess that makes me qualified, because I lived through mail fraud issues.  I know what the Tampa FBI refused to investigate and I hold them accountable.

(06) For what it’s worth, as if it’s any of anyone’s business, that isn’t what I was convicted of.  Curtis got that wrong too … and through regurgitation … Wright and Dibert did too.  What does that say for their “credibility”?   4ClosureFraud jumped on the bandwagon too, but later retracted its article after readers openly criticized the blog for regurgitating the smear campaign. Still, Wright and Dibert took the “cheap shot” way out and decided to further “make stuff up of their own”, like stating that this Author was convicted of mortgage fraud.  They are worse than Henry Pierson Curtis because of their inept modus of sensationalism.  Who are they working for, the banks?

(07) Curtis reported the author was 62.  At the time the story was released. WRONG!  This author was 61.

(08) Curtis reported the author was charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States and six lesser felony charges including three counts of fraud and three counts of swindling.  WRONG!  The author thinks he knows what he was charged with and what he plead guilty to.  None of these allegations Curtis caused to be printed in the Smutinel were factual.  Besides, people who commit any kind of major crime get to do the time.  Three years probation and a $1,000 fine doesn’t say much for the word, “heinous”.  That’s what you get for sending certified letters in the mail, based on the belief of an organization that didn’t disclose they were being investigated by the FBI at the time they sold the author a packet of money orders, which they claimed were legit.

(09) What the media did not report, is that this Author filed a fraudulent concealment action in Tyler, Texas against the Family Farm Preservation and its conspirators for failing to disclose to him they were being investigated by the feds for contriving a scheme to pay off debts using phony money orders according to the UCC.  Everything looks legal, until it isn’t.  You would have to know what my state of mind was at the time, which you didn’t.  So you do NOT have all the details.

(10) In addition, Curtis made sure to report every single aspect of this author’s life, so his pack of lies would be splashed out over Google to anyone typing in any meta words relating to any of the connected material.  What an ingenious way to smear someone.  Knock out their whole way of making a living. But, remember, this is the kind of person Curtis is.  It appears there are others out there that have the means to report what’s right … and don’t.

(11) Curtis reported that the examination was conducted in the Osceola County Courthouse.  WRONG!  The examination was conducted in the conference room at the Ramada Inn in Kissimmee, in an offsite location, with wi-fi and internal access to courthouse records provided by the Clerk’s IT Department.  But, like the rest of his story, Curtis didn’t care whether he got his facts straight or not about something that happened to this author over 20 years ago.  Curtis just wanted fodder to bolster his campaign against the Clerk, no matter what kind of misrepresentations were necessary.  But yet, many of you believed everything that MFI-Miami trash-talked on its blog, followed by piggybankblog, which was nothing more than a regurgitation by a reporter for a major market newspaper that likes to make up news rather than report news.  This shows the level that some people will stoop to in an attempt to make themselves look wonderful in an effort to promote their own ambitions.  This author likens Curtis to the robosigners that help make up documents out of thin air to steal houses.  I frankly don’t care what the media thinks about this.  We’re not finished here yet.

(12) Enter Jorge Esteves and Orlando’s Channel 9 … once the station got a copy of the Report, it proceeded to regurgitate what the Orlando Sentinel reported without checking the facts of the case, plus added some misstatements of its own.  One of the worst things a media outlet can do, having been a former radio journalist, is to air material without first vetting its content. Channel 9 was quick to state it was going to attempt to get Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate the Report, to no avail.  Pam Bondi will not investigate her own constituents who happen to be banks or servicers, who contribute to her political campaigns!

(13) The Forensic Examination was delivered in two volumes. The first volume contained 4 sections, totaling 362 pages.  The second volume contained 3 sections, totaling 412 pages, including the attorney opinion letter.  That’s a total of 774 pages, not counting the Introduction and Table Of Contents.  Channel 9 looked at the back page of the report and declared there were 412 pages total in it, without even looking through the Report. WRONG! Had Esteves (and Weidner) actually read the Report, they would have seen there were two volumes totaling over 774 pages.  Maybe they would have actually investigated some of the documents and found they were actually recorded in Osceola County’s land records!

(14) Mr. Weidner has an ego and a reputation to protect.  Unlike other attorneys who have been contacting this Author (and retaining him on certain cases to assist them in putting a case together), Weidner was quick to get on television in Orlando and smear the Report, declaring, “it’s not worth the paper it’s printed on.”   How would he know?  He didn’t even read the Report.  He was seen on camera thumbing through the first few pages before making his comments.  He didn’t even read the attorney opinion letter at the end of the two-volume Report. If he did, he sure didn’t say anything about it because Esteves was out to make him shine on camera. Remember? Ego.

(15) The attorney whose Opinion Letter was included at the end of the second volume of the Report, Jennifer Englert with the Orlando Law Group, had a TV commercial for her law firm running on Channel 9, which aired five minutes before the station ran the Weidner interview.  When contacted about the lambasting of the Report (including her Opinion Letter), the attorney demanded equal time on the station, which downplayed her involvement.  It is no secret that Channel 9 and its news producers have a hard-on for the Osceola County Clerk and like Curtis, will do everything they can to turn anything positive the Clerk does, into something negative, for the sake of creating news instead of reporting it like most responsible journalists.  But remember, the whole pack of sensationalists are irresponsible and self-serving.  Unlike most affected and distressed homeowners, they don’t want to know what really happened to them involving foreclosure fraud. They don’t care about the politics of it all as much as the banks, the media and the judges who throw homeowners out of their houses do.

(16) Ashton, as well as the Sheriff, could not find any “victims”, even though the entire Report showed 17 cases of suspect documents filed in the the land records of Osceola County, Florida alone.  The witnesses names in the Report were kept as WITNESS A through WITNESS F f0r a reason.  It seems that Jack Wright, Janet Reiner and Steve Dibert overlooked the fact that hundreds of homeowners who were included in this Report were victimized because they lost their homes to REMICs and their law firms who had to retain servicers to make up documents to create standing.  Let’s face it, misery loves company and these folks don’t care who gets trashed because this is what they think they need to do to be popular with other disgruntled homeowners. “Let him who sinneth not cast the first stone.”   BTW, Witness A and Witnesses E & F were attorneys with inside information key to their respective investigations which affected certain statements made in the Forensic Examination. Witness B gave me taped statements as to the inside scam to re-create mortgage notes from scratch to create standing to steal homes. Ocwen was at the center of that controversy.  What its staff did in West Palm Beach, Florida was unforgivable.

(17) Even attorney Lynn Szymoniak, who appeared on the 60 Minutes presentation on April 3, 2011, “The Next Housing Shock”, stated, “It doesn’t matter what he did 20 years ago. What matters is what he’s doing now.”  (referring to this author)   Apparently, many of you out there think I should just quit while I’m ahead and drop off the face of the earth. You are dreaming.  Sorry, the system is rigged and judges have been told that they need to drag out your case as long as possible until you give up and walk away. I know that.  The attorneys I work with know that.  So, it becomes a test of time, money, patience and your willingness to bring forth the truth, not just mine.

(18) Since the release of the Report, Texas-based DK Consultants LLC, has been retained by multiple law firms to do chain of title and pre-trial research and to assist in consulting on cases all over the U.S.  This Author still continues to lecture around the country and in online webinars and has been listed as an expert witness in pre-trial statements.

(19) The Osceola County Sheriff released a one-page press release that said little if anything as to the sums spent investigating.  This is only one of the reasons then-Sheriff Bob Hansell did not run for re-election again. This Author offered to provide them with the names and contact information of the “witnesses” in the Report; however, the detectives weren’t really interested.   All the better.  The witnesses were listed anonymously because if their true identifies were revealed, they’d be dead.  I want them alive enough to testify before the grand jury. Two of them have inside information that could send bankers and attorneys to prison for a good long time.  It’s obvious that the sensationalists would rather not see that happen.

(20) If the law enforcement agencies wanted the Witness information, all they had to do was ask.  But, that was not their intention.  This author believes they were told to shit-can this investigation and blackball anyone involved with it, because a minimum of 4o0 people were facing jail time and Osceola County could be liable into the hundreds of millions of dollars for wrongful evictions based on fraudulent documents relied upon by foreclosure mill law firms doing the prosecuting of the foreclosure actions.  I believe this was at the directive of the attorney who was representing the County at the meeting February 9, 2015.  I wonder what the Osceola County Risk Manager would say to all of this?

(21) The fact patterns emerged during information gathering for the Report, using the search tools, MERS, HSBC, U.S. Bank, Bank of New York Mellon, as well as the other major banks who made trillions securitizing mortgage paper.  After about 90 days of alleged delinquency, the Assignments of Mortgage containing the manufactured, suspect information, would surface and be recognized by the forensic team as suspect.  One homeowner’s assignment was found to have been recorded six months AFTER the bank foreclosed on and sold her house!  You think that’s a lie?  Go look up the Ibanez case in Massachusetts.

(22) The newly-elected 9th Circuit States’ Attorney, Aramis Ayala, has been under fire since taking over for Ashton.  She is aware of the Report.  As I said previously, this isn’t over yet.  Those of you doubting Thomases that think the Report is invalid have not heard all of the facts in evidence.  The documents discussed in the Report are valid and they were used to steal peoples’ homes.  The major banks are involved, but not to the extent you think. It’s mostly the servicers and third-party document mills. The people who lost their homes, regardless of what the Sheriff says, are victims.  More than likely, I will write a detailed book about all of this, including all of the inside dirt we uncovered in the investigation that DIDN’T MAKE THE REPORT because it would have gotten us all killed!  There is at least one major bank whose 18 employees would face DOJ prosecution thanks to the contents of this Report … that is … if they’d just look at it!   I may not be an angel, but like Frank William Abagnale, Jr., I think I’ve well made up for my indiscretions. You can make up all the news you want, but if you can’t face fact, you lose!

So … if any of you are going to send me links to the sensationalists’ trash-talking blogs in denial of the real truth, go f**k yourself!  You wouldn’t know the truth if it bit you in the ass!  You should hope these sensationalist, mindless f**ks don’t print something nasty about you and your dilemma … or your past … in the future.  Do your research and discover the pertinent truth for yourself.  I played in the Patriot Movement and paid the price.  I paid my debt to society and I owe you nothing but praise and gratitude for “fighting the good fight”. Hope and pray that justice comes swiftly to those who deserve it, and condemnation, to those who don’t.

NOTE: Anyone wishing to take up the issue with this Author personally can email the author at his business email at cloudedtitles@gmail.com because no one’s comments are going to be allowed to be posted on this blog regarding this article!



Filed under OP-ED