Tag Archives: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc.

Foreclosure and your civil rights: A judge rules against you in spite of questionable land record documents … what to do next? (PART II)

(OP-ED) — This overview of cases involving civil rights abuses are the author’s opinions based on his legal research and are for educational purposes only and should not constitute any rendering of legal advice or seek to draw any conclusions of law. This is the second discussion of three parts.

THE RULES OF THE GAME HAVE BEEN CHANGED

The issue of police brutality all boils down to the issue of perception of what law enforcement stands for … from both sides of the coin. When police make an arrest, they do so based on material facts surrounding probable cause. The behavior and demeanor of the accused and their right to justice is largely determined by the answers they give and the way they react to questioning by the arresting officers. We spend an inordinate amount of time watching television, where police officers are displayed as being the saviors against the wicked. Yet, in order for a criminal case to proceed, the evidence has to stack up against the accused. The evidence cannot be controverted or subverted with lies and deceit.

“We have repeatedly held, therefore, that an officer violates the Fourth Amendment by omission only if ‘it would have been clear to a reasonable officer that the omitted fact was material to the probable-cause determination. A warrant request violates the Fourth Amendment if the requesting officer knowingly, intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, makes false statements in requesting the warrant and the false statements were necessary to the determination that a warrant should issue.’”

— Cited in Rainsberger v. Benner, 7th App. Cir. No. 17-2521 (Jan. 15, 2019)

And what does this have to do with civil rights, you ask yourself?

Because the Rainsberger case turned on the evidence, when it was discovered that the detective investigating the case (Benner) omitted exculpatory evidence and fabricated evidence wherein the probable cause affidavit was riddled with lies, undercut with the omissions that would have kept Rainsberger from being arrested in the first place … the outcome was that Detective Benner’s sovereign immunity privileges were stripped away by the Court because of his actions. That’s how this argument relates to foreclosures when brought into the civil realm.

The entire foreclosure scenario also deals with material fact, which is why the author brought the arguments within the Rainsberger case into this discussion. When material facts are distorted, manufactured or omitted, causing the homeowner to be unfairly prosecuted as to his right to be secure in his “persons and papers” as guaranteed under the Constitution, someone must be held accountable.

Since the 2008 financial collapse, numerous discoveries have been disclosed to the consuming public of deceitful acts committed by the banks and their servicers and third-party document mills. Unfortunately, with the changing of the rules in the way the “game is played”, moving cases to federal court have been reformed to the point that simply stating that “a person created a phony document used to steal my house” just doesn’t work anymore with the Supreme Court rulings in the Twombly and Iqbal cases. The author has included the following research for your education and understanding, as having proper knowledge of what to expect on the federal level, which should be put in the forefront in any anticipated civil rights actions that follow a foreclosure:

WITHOUT FORETHOUGHT: SUE! SUE! SUE!

It is problematic that over 90% of Americans do not understand their system of laws. In fact, criminals understand the legal system better than their enfranchised counterparts. When faced with legal action, the defendant homeowner either becomes despondent or angry. There is no in between.

The first objective is to lash out against every person or idea that contradicts one’s belief system, as flawed as it may be. The “entitled” believe they should stay in the house for free … that all of the foreclosure accusations are really the bank’s fault … yet the borrower obligated himself when he signed the mortgage documents, thus, creating a legal “can of worms” for himself. The finality of truth brings with it a reality check.

All semblance of logic goes right out the window in favor of emotion. This is one major reason this author created the Clouded Titles website and wrote the book by the same name back in 2009-2010 (officially released in December of 2010). In order to get in this game and play it well, emotion must be replaced with legal logic and right thinking.

If you’re like most Americans, you place blame on others for your own shortcomings. Shortcomings however do not replace mistakes. But what if you’ve been blindsided with facts you know not to be true? How do you cope then? Most Americans would let their emotions “out of check” upon realizing that the banks messed up their own paperwork and that now they (the homeowners) are paying for it!

CHAINS OF TITLE TELL STORIES … STORIES THAT DON’T LIE!

Without a doubt, the author’s previous PART I post disclosed that two independent examinations of the land records in Texas and Florida demonstrated the rampant use of false documents, one of which came to light in the U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Harpster case in Florida:

And this is not the only case either. In another Florida case, the bank’s attorneys came into court with not one but three different versions of what they claimed was the “new and improved” promissory note:

And on the witness stand, in another Florida case, Erica A. Johnson-Seck admitted to be a “robosigner”:

And the foregoing case found its way into a New York State foreclosure decision!

Sadly, a lot of homeowners run to bankruptcy court, thinking they can stave off a foreclosure. All this does is kill their credit scores to the tune of 450 points for up to 10 years! Even the federal Office of the Comptroller of the Currency calls bankruptcy “a stall tactic”. But what happens when the bank runs into bankruptcy court and lies about its “position” in the chain of title:

STEALING PEOPLES’ HOMES FOR FUN AND PROFIT!

The foregoing headline was spouted by a foreclosure defense attorney in Texas during a discussion of a workshop he attended that was held by foreclosure mill attorneys. One of the attendees, whose name repeatedly surfaced in the Williamson County, Texas Real Property Records Audit, Stephen C. Porter, appeared nervous because after the audit was released, he was exposed to the world as a “robosigning attorney”. This is where things get dicey for Mr. Porter, because this author looked up Mr. Porter’s Texas Deed of Trust and compared the signatures of the robosigned documents to those of Mr. Porter’s own mortgage note and they were unbelievably different from each other. In fact, it appeared as if the signatures may have been put there by his notary!

All of this of course, leads up to the discussion of the intent to defraud … the homeowner, the land records and the judge. This author believes that all foreclosure victims deserve their rights to due process and that any “officer” of the court, which an attorney is, should lose their “sovereign immunity” if they omit, lie or cheat their way through a foreclosure and steal someone’s homes using false documents which they themselves may have had a hand in!

It’s just that when homeowners win, they become like electricity, seeking the path of least resistance and crawling back into their comfort zone. They have no interest in follow-through to see that the party or parties creating the phony documents, which still continue to litter their chain of title like a hooker with AIDS, are brought to justice.

The time to attack these phony documents is BEFORE the foreclosure starts, not AFTER! In the Harpster case, the attorney at least had the gumption to research the assignment and talk to the bonding agent and obtain an affidavit which stated the notary did not have a valid commission at the time David J. Stern’s own secretary (Cheryl Samons) executed the assignment.

ALL IS NOT LOST IF YOU CHOOSE FOLLOW-THROUGH … WIN OR LOSE!

In a recent foreclosure case decided in a Mississippi Chancery Court, the judge, who is covered by the State’s risk pool as to her liability, gave the defendant homeowner 7-1/2 minutes to present his case and despite the best evidence presented in that amount of time by the homeowner:

  1. The judge decided he’d had enough time because (as she previously announced to the court) the judge had to leave to go to her daughter’s volleyball game;
  2. After making her ruling, the judge commented that it must be rough “looking through rose-colored glasses, having lived in a $274,000 home for free for over 5 years.” This clearly indicates bias;
  3. The other side’s attorney’s complaint was deficient, partly due to mismarked and improper exhibits that the judge refused to allow to be stricken from the record when objected to; and
  4. Given the judge’s social calendar, it’s obvious she cared more about not being in court versus simply making snide remarks when the evidence presented supported the case actually going to trial.

This is where the system of things HAS TO “kick into high gear”.

After seeing and hearing the results of this case … and here goes the “if it was me” diatribe, the author would:

  1. File a complaint with the Mississippi Judicial Review Board against the judge.
  2. File bar complaints against the three attorneys who “touched” the case, because they inadvertently and purposefully omitted evidence which would have pointed a finger directly at law firm involvement in the manufacture of an assignment used to give the plaintiff (LSF9) standing.
  3. File a Motion for Reconsideration in a timely manner (10 days), citing those things that the judge failed to take into account before making her decision (all administrative appeals and alternative moves must be taken before proceeding to filing a State Tort Claims Act action).
  4. The timetable for the due process violation (under the McDonough v. Smith case), according to the U.S. Supreme Court decision, begins to run when the final adjudication has taken place.

Could the homeowner have won his case (or in the alternative got his matter set for trial) had he retained counsel to defend his home? Maybe. That is a story for another day because it involves unwrapping the mindset of why homeowners (and the public at large) don’t trust attorneys.

There is some room for argument here that the damage would actually occur when the home is sold and the homeowner is evicted, but my non-lawyer take here is that the judge’s ruling set the clock in motion because it represents a final decision for which other actions (eviction) could follow.

AS TO THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, JUDGES SHOULD PAY FOR MAKING BAD DECISIONS RESULTING IN CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS!

Attorneys have errors and omissions policies. Robosigners are supposed to be bonded and have errors and omissions insurance naming them as a “covered party” in order to be a robosigner for MERS. Judges have bonds. Some judges have bonds with their own respective counties. Other state’s judges are paid by the state to be a judge, which means the State’s own “risk pool” (a big pile of money which pays out damages for provable civil rights violations) is ripe for the picking. Those who have the fortitude to file a 42 USC § 1983/1985 action may have the opportunity to realize justice when it’s used to get an attorney disbarred, get a document manufacturer prosecuted or get a judge tossed off the bench for aiding and abetting felony perjury.

The proof must come “in the pudding”. One cannot simply wave an alleged phony document around in front of the judge without implicating the parties that were involved in creating it. Justice is never served unless you can reach into the pudding, the likes of the Harpster case or better, and bring up the evidence required to show you were deprived of your due process rights by the Court and its officers. In the Harpster case, the judge who ruled in favor of the homeowner (Hon. Lynn Tepper, the author believes) was driven or “persuaded” to leave the bench by the political judicial hierarchy, because she was a fair judge and recognized fraud on the court for what it was. This judge did not simply take the bank’s word for anything, given the proof that was provided … stuff that this author has been sharing from an investigative standpoint for years.

This shows you how much “control” the banks have over the court systems in this country and why it’s likely a judge may be the culpable party in siding with lies by the attorney for the servicer. No one likes a liar. Liars deserve to go to jail if they participate in the thievery of stealing someone’s home using evidence that is manufactured or conveniently altered or omitted in what appears to be the commission of a crime.

And THAT is where the criminal justice system intertwines with the civil justice system. And if anything, police brutality should be the least of our concerns when “the system of things” is tainted with bias.

And this is exactly the reason WHY the author elected to do an online Foreclosure Defense 101 Workshop … because right thinking is called for here.

Stay tuned for PART III

1 Comment

Filed under I'm not posting any more stuff on here!

MERS RULES IN THE FIRST U.S. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS; SCREWS 2 HOMEOWNERS

(BREAKING NEWS – OP-ED) — The attached cases were argued by the same attorney for the homeowners. Different attorneys for the foreclosure mill, pro-bank law firm of K&L Gates argued for the banks.  This is provided for your educational purposes only and to warn you of the dangers of litigating anywhere within the First U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal’s jurisdiction. My opinions of MERS and what it stands for are my own and do not constitute legal advice.  After all, MERS would like to put a bullet in my head. 

Believe it or not, the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal are still in operation despite the corona-crisis.  Last Friday, the appellate panel screwed two homeowners in REMIC foreclosure cases.  Worse yet, one case relied on the outcome of the other case to make the ruling finite. When you have to go into this particular federal appellate court, remember who has set more favorable case law here: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”: now owned by the same bunch that owns the New York Stock Exchange).

Here’s the first case, that the appellate panel used to set the standard for the second case:

Dyer v Wells Fargo Bank NA, 1st App Cir No 15-2421 (Apr 17. 2020)

From the outset of this ruling, it looks as if “Dreamhouse” didn’t do the Plaintiff any favors by including MERS as a nominee within her mortgage.  After all, Dreamhouse appears to have been a corresponding lender who got its money for this loan from an investor pool.

Remember, you’re in the first circuit here.  MERS rules!  MERS gets to do anything it wants.  Assign mortgages.  Publish confirmatory assignments.  I’m so convinced that MERS (through K&L Gates’ attorneys) gets to control the entire narrative in court arguments I could just spit fire.  Even though the mortgage document doesn’t specifically say that MERS can “assign” anything, MERS got out in front of the mortgage foreclosure crisis and pre-established the narrative, so it could come in in subsequent cases and argue that narrative and win every time.

All the same arguments we’ve heard before (specifically in Culhane v Aurora Loan Svcs_021513-1) that MERS can do anything it wants to. However, the narrative is controlled by what MERS can do or not do.  No one is pointing to the actual parties acting in MERS’s name. What this appears to be is just another redux of Culhane.  MERS’s attorneys can argue that MERS is both a nominee (agent) for the Lender and has all of the power of the Lender, especially in THIS Circuit … and get away with it.  This is why I don’t like federal court for litigating foreclosure cases. This is why banks love federal court to argue foreclosure cases … because they win 99.9% of the time!

Old arguments aren’t working anymore.  We need new ammunition, given the fact the second case ruling was predicated on the first one:

Hayden v HSBC Bank USA NA, 1st App Cir N0 16-2274 (Apr 17, 2020)

SAME ‘OL … SAME ‘OL … 

By now, if you’re reading your own MERS-originated mortgages, you can plainly see how you’ve F**KED yourself!  You gave MERS the “official” and “contractual” right to F**K you.  They can foreclose and sell your home.  They can rape your bank account in the name of preset case law they set in their favor.  They can release and cancel anything.  They can do anything your lender does … and can even come into court and act as your lender. Let me put it bluntly here … MERS is a disguise worn by the servicer.  It’s the servicer that’s actually doing the sodomizing here.

In this case, the Haydens filed multiple bankruptcy cases over time, delaying their foreclosure (and screwing up their credit) until 2026.

Again … as you can see on Page 3 of this ruling … MERS can do anything it wants … including telling the First Circuit to “get on its knees and bark like a dog”!  Again … old argument from the banks … borrowers do not have standing to challenge a mortgage assignment based on a PSA violation!  Again … the banks and MERS are controlling the narrative.  Old hat.  Doesn’t work.  Still being plied upon the courts and borrowers are paying for an attorney to argue the same old hat stuff … and losing.  Statute of limitations arguments … still old hat.  Not working anymore.  Hasn’t worked since 2o15 yet is still being argued.  Borrowers are still paying attorneys to argue the same things that don’t work.  The First Circuit isn’t buying any of it. It’s not having much better luck in any of the other circuits that have had the same ‘ol, same ‘ol garbage pleadings tossed at them.

Oh … and the PSA … that’s the banks’ narrative.  My narrative is the entire 424(b)(5) Prospectus.  It’s used as evidence in the C&E to establish fact.  You have to pick your battles carefully.  Each battle costs money.  After this corona-crisis is over … foreclosures will cost money. Money that hasn’t been there because half of the economy was shut down versus going in and letting “herd immunity” prevail.

YOU’RE DAMNED IF YOU DO AND DAMNED IF YOU DON’T! 

President Trump can’t do anything without being criticized for it.  He shuts down the economy and the public for its own protection and everyone on “the other side” bitches because he either didn’t do it soon enough or it wasn’t the right move in the first place.  You can’t win with these people.  We know the virus started in Wuhan, China.  But as soon as the President references it as the Chinese virus … now he’s a racist.  His opponents don’t know when to quit.  Sometimes, keeping your political trap shut can work in your favor.  They’re making a mockery of everything the President does, yet most of them have had several decades of serving in Washington to “get things done”, but we’re no better off with them than without them.  This is politics folks. If you don’t like the way things are, change them.  But remember …

The President is the head of the Executive Branch, the branch that enforces the laws.  The President is tasked with running the country … not the person that makes the laws in the first place!  He’s a CEO, not a politician, which is why his opponents hate him so much. He won’t play in their “sandbox”.  Boo frickety hoo!

Congress makes the laws (in the form of bills).  When Congress introduces a “bill” … that “bill” costs money to make it work. Taxpayer money. Someone has to pay for it and it sure ain’t Congress!  This latest stimulus package again demonstrates how much pork Congress got away with spending … and the economy that has been doing so well (that all these lame-brained politicians are trying to take credit for) is now stagnating.

The Courts decide whether the laws are constitutional, are properly enforced and/or whether Congress overstepped its bounds when it enacted a law.  Today’s courts like to issue very narrow rulings, which is why you have cases like these being decided against homeowners.

This is our system of checks and balances folks.  It’s what the will of the people created. Deal with it!

And what the hell does this have to do with foreclosures?

This is why the Dyer ruling was 12 pages and the Hayden ruling only 5 pages.  Because the Dyer ruling says enough to where it doesn’t have to be repeated ad infinitum, ad nauseam in the Hayden ruling.  It has everything to do with the atrocities that banks are allowed to get away with, using MERS as a disguise for the real truth.

Everything in these two cases affects every ruling that comes out of the U.S. First Circuit Court of Appeals.  Other federal circuits may choose not to rely on these two cases … or Culhane for that matter.  But it clearly shows circuit split when it comes to how the courts treat MERS and what they will let MERS get away with.  If you don’t know what to plead … how can you expect to win your foreclosure case?

THE CANCELLATION & EXPUNGEMENT ACTION (The “C & E”) …

Because we’re seeing results with using the C & E, it goes without saying that I’d talk about it again.  Neither of these two cases discussed anything within the contents of the document that made sense other than the date and time of the event and the claims the assignments made violated the PSA.  That moves the argument into the bank’s narrative.   To argue the bank’s narrative is to liken that strategy with the comment Robert Stack made in the comedy movie Airplane: “That’s just what they’d be expecting us to do!”

The C & E does just the opposite as it moves the narrative in a different direction … one “they won’t be expecting”:

  1. Virtually all 50 states have common law rights to cancel written instruments. That includes bogus assignments!
  2. Virtually all 50 states have penal codes that prohibit the recording of false utterances in the public record!
  3. Virtually all 50 states have a consumer protection act that can be tied to the recording of the false utterance!

The C & E is postured within a declaratory relief action that can be utilized while the banks aren’t foreclosing … hint, hint:

  1. The declaratory relief action is discretionary in federal courts, which is why we like to use it in state courts!
  2. The declaratory relief action can be accompanied by a notice of lis pendens, which can be effective in stopping title closings in foreclosure cases!
  3. The declaratory relief action in many state courts can ask for a ruling on a document to be applied to the entire chain of title as a precursor to filing a quiet title action.

The C & E costs less money to effectuate than most foreclosure defense actions yet still is able to achieve a timed delay:

  1. Investors use C & E’s to buy time.  Time is of the essence no matter what battle you pick. This can buy more time if used correctly in both deed of trust and mortgage states!
  2. We are now seeing that filing corresponding criminal complaints with local law enforcement is “shaking things up” in the civil realm when it comes to litigating false utterances!
  3. Many times, the criminal intent contained within the false utterance can be used to put a court on notice that someone is trying to “protect the sanctity and decorum of the court” by keeping the judge from becoming an accessory to the criminal acts committed by the servicers’ employees, acting in the name of MERS!

You still have time to factor in a positive outcome.  There is still time to get your 2-day training session (with materials) on DVD (8 discs) and train yourself and your attorney to fight the good fight because the foreclosure moratorium is still in play here for most of you. Visit the Clouded Titles website for more information.  Supplies are limited so order yours now!

As a special added bonus … your order includes a 30-minute consultation session with the author! 

 

 

Leave a comment

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED, Securitization Issues

WILL THERE BE AN UPTICK IN FORECLOSURES ONCE THE CORONA-CRISIS IS OVER?

(OP-ED) — The author of this post is a consultant to attorneys on foreclosure and chain of title matters and none of the following opinions should be constituted as legal advice or seek to guarantee a legal outcome. It posits what this author sees as what is to come.  It may not be the “whole new way of life” everyone thinks is going to take place due to this pandemic. 

This post is not for the faint of heart nor is it designed to make you more paranoid than most of you probably already are.  It is designed to impart some common sense rationality into dealing with the post-traumatic issues of what we collectively are all perceiving as a “crisis”.

Some of us think this whole thing is overblown.  The majority however have unknowingly allowed the “crisis” to replace common sense with survival fear … and rightly so.  It’s one thing to think that the coronavirus was just going to stay put in China when in fact, we have such an upwardly mobile society that everyone has been instilled with traveling to different parts of the world, be it on a plane, on a cruise, whatever … no one expected this would hit America and I believe we were all duped as to the “numbers” and the “purpose” for COVID-19.

Here are some interesting “takes” I’ve picked up on over the last couple of weeks …

  1. Chinese-Americans who are loyal to this country have stated to me that China well understated the numbers of dead and infected as the result of the viral spread there.
  2. The understatement was intentional, to lull us all (and I mean the World Health Organization (WHO) and the countries affected by the virus, including America) into a false sense of security so we would continue to go on about our daily lives as if this virus really didn’t matter.
  3. Knowing that we were already embroiled in political turmoil in this country, we’ve been “played” by the Chinese in a further effort to destroy the credibility of many of our elected leaders and further create political dissension in our every day lives.
  4. Most of the world was not medically ready for another pandemic.  If WHO was really concerned with the spread of this virus, it should have reacted more quickly when it was observed that the virus was spreading outside of China’s borders.
  5. We can all point fingers at our government for being “reactive”, because that is how our government has always been … reactive instead of proactive.  We weren’t ready for the virus when it hit our shores and we sure as hell aren’t ready for it now.
  6. Our medical systems in this country rely too much on non-essential and boutique surgeries and were not ready to deal with massive shortages in critical care supplies and labor.
  7. Our government’s medical “advisories” and social “responsibilities” were lacking in keeping its undisciplined citizenry safe from each other, allowing for Darwinistic opportunities to avail themselves upon an unsuspecting public.
  8. Instead of heading off the pandemic “at the pass”, state and local governments were slow to react to contain the virus and identify the “vectors”, which is what South Korea did when it first became aware of the invasion of the virus.
  9. The saving grace was that most state governments went above and beyond the federal measures enacted to stop evictions and foreclosures during the coronavirus outbreak.
  10. The not-so-saving grace is what happens after the fallout rears its ugly head, the supply chain breaks down in certain quarters and the economy can’t put enough people back to work fast enough to recover from the shock the country took in the 30-60 “stay in place” periods.

This is where thinks get “quirky”.

As was explained in some “insider” memorandums which I managed to retrieve through my back channels, the mortgage loan servicers (especially on these MERS-originated mortgages) have to pay advances on the distribution dates to the investors who funded the loans through the various REMICs (Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits).

There were (at last count) roughly 6.6-million people that applied for unemployment benefits, despite the economic “stimulus” package.  In my twisted mind, this is like getting a hand job by a hooker, wherein the “wham bam” happens and then you realize the relief was only temporary and you’re right back at the stress level you started from before “the act” happened.

The mortgage loan servicers who handle the payments to the REMICs (the advance payments of principal and interest on every securitized loan) every month on the distribution date, have to pay those advance payments whether borrowers make those payments or not.  I hope you got that.  No matter (during this crisis) whether you made your monthly mortgage payment or not, you are NOT in default because the servicer has been making your payments anyway.  They just won’t tell you that.

The problem becomes worse however when the servicers have to make these payments regularly over time, believing that they can collect the the past due payments from the borrowers (who are out of work or close to being out of work or short on funds) who are wanting a forbearance on their mortgage loans.  This means the servicers would have to consider putting the payments (including interest) on the back end of the loan.  This means that for those of you who (for example) were on “Payment 22” of your amortization chart on a 30-year fixed rate loan, you’re asking for Payments 22, 23 and 24 (plus interest) to be put on the back end of your loan, which is compounding interest upon principal upon interest.  Let’s face it, most Americans do NOT have the reserves to make the mortgage payments past one month, which is why they had to borrow the money to buy the home in the first place.

Now the mortgage loan servicers are stressed financially because the payments have to be paid into the securitized trust pool every month, regardless of the borrowers’ circumstances.  The servicers may be forced into “having to rob Peter to pay Paul”, which means the servicers will borrow from escrow accounts all over their servicing network of mortgages, in the hopes that they’ll be able to repay those escrow accounts back over time.  The problem is, when that doesn’t happen (and even at the time funds were borrowed from escrows), there is still a shortage in the escrow accounts that the servicers borrowed from to pay the REMICs their monthly payments to.  A prolonged period of these payments (6-9 months; if this crisis were to continue) would put the servicers in jeopardy.

Fast forward to the end of the corona-crisis … 

The mortgage loan servicers are out of pocket all of the advance payments they had to pay during the crisis, which means they’re going to be on an all-out campaign to try and recover as much of the shortfalls as possible to reimburse all of the escrows they borrowed from to keep everything looking “current” on the books (this is why servicers get in trouble).  This is one of the reasons why Ocwen got into trouble and ended up having to sell $600-million in securities to bolster its “advance” payment funds to investors.  That’s like chasing a large, lump-sum credit card payment, making minimum payments every month.  The debts just never seem to get paid off.  Most borrowers can understand that.  Now, factor that into a much larger scale.

By now, you’re beginning to see the “crisis” occurring within the ranks of the mortgage loan servicers.  They will be reluctant to do loan mods because that means more perks for the borrowers. Extensions the servicers really aren’t interested in “affording” because they’re already swimming in borrowed time.

Couple that with the borrower’s payment history of already-missed payments BEFORE the crisis was declared and you’ve just dumped gasoline on the already burning flame.  My suggestions here, which are simple to ascertain and follow:

  1. During the crisis, check your land records EVERY WEEK to see whether or not the servicer has “manufactured” any assignments using MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) as a means to assign, transfer or convey a mortgage loan into a REMIC trust in anticipation of having to do a foreclosure.
  2. If the assignment was done BEFORE the foreclosure and you’ve already become aware of it, use this opportunity to research your chain of title and see whether or not the information contained within the assignment is false and misrepresentative.
  3. Look up the state statutes to see what felonies were committed by asserting the false and misrepresentative information into the assignment, which was subsequently recorded into the public record and begin to document all aspects of it (who created the assignment, who executed the assignment, who notarized the assignment, who are the parties named in the assignment, who caused it to be recorded, etc.) for reference.
  4. DO NOT attempt to contact any of the parties creating the allegedly-bogus assignment. This is like tipping your hand in a high-stakes poker game.  I cannot stress that enough (as a consultant to foreclosure cases).  Telling the other side of your game plan is going to jeopardize your chances for recovery down the road.  What is important is to gather as much information as possible about all of the parties mentioned within the assignment without contacting them directly.  (There will be plenty of time for that in court-controlled discovery).
  5. Obtain a certified copy of your REMIC from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission while the ink is still fresh and you can take advantage of the time lapse created by the corona-crisis which allows you some advantage in preparing a suit for cancelling and expunging the suspect assignment.

For those of you that don’t get the “gist” of attacking documents, I have a kit available (in limited supply) online at CloudedTitles.com/shopThe C&E on Steroids!   This will give you a blueprint as to how to successfully challenge the phony documents in the land records.   It’s an 8-DVD video set plus a book containing the information you’ll need to arm yourself for the upcoming “fight” I think many of you are going to be involved in.

Why is this important?   If you’re facing foreclosure, even before the crisis, this moratorium will give you time to: (a.) think about Plan B; and (b.) act on that plan.  Even the 60-day window, which has already started ticking (courtesy of the federal government and extended by various state governments) will give you enough time to get your case files together, analyze them and more forward with retaining counsel (if you haven’t already) to “fight the good fight” because the corona-crisis itself was just not enough … we’ll be seeing another wave of foreclosures when it’s over because when it comes to reimbursement of an already-depleted money supply, the servicers (who are tasked with stealing the home) will stop at nothing to take your home away from you … and sadly, the government won’t be there to bail you out.

1 Comment

Filed under OP-ED, Securitization Issues

LESSONS LEARNED … INTER ALIA

(BREAKING NEWS — OP-ED) — The poster of this blog is not an attorney and thus, the items proffered on this post should be taken in context as court rulings and should be further interpreted by bar-licensed attorneys (past the point of your personal discretion).  The commentary posted here is not legal advice but is for your educational value only. 

The month of March certainly roared in like a lion when it comes to court cases.  There are 3 of them which are integral to learning about foreclosure defense as to the “what to do” and “what not to do”, or in the alternative, what to “take away” from the herein discussed cases versus “what is irrelevant” and unimportant in them.

FEDERAL CASE: FDCPA

The attached case is a precedent setter out of the Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals:

Riccio et al v Sentry Credit Inc, 3rd App Cir No 18-1463 (Mar 30, 2020)_Precedential

If anything could work to your benefit, the Appellant’s attorney’s contact information is listed within the ruling.  This case involves abusive debt collection practices prohibited under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692 et seq.

This case appears to work to your advantage in the event some snarky foreclosure mill lawyer attempts to remove your case from state court to federal court, which allows you to amend your declaratory relief action to include “debt validation” because this case smacks in that direction, the requirements of a validation notice under the Act.  The questions in this case concerns whether “oral disputes” are also covered under the Act.

This is one of the key reasons I keep telling people, when it comes to debt collectors, you can’t take phone calls into court … or can you?

15 U.S.C. § 1692g(b) specifically demands that the debt collector needs to be notified “in writing” within the 30-day dispute period, demanding validation of the debt. This is the very issue that the Third Appellate Court appears to have considered.

This case clearly involves a third-party debt collector, whom we all hate, right?  Because the defendant (Sentry Credit, Inc.) (a.) was out of state; and (b.) involved a federal question (FDCPA), this case definitely belonged in federal district court (see my book FDCPA, Debt Collection and Foreclosures for further explanation).

The thing is … the defendant did indeed require a response from the Plaintiff in writing; however, it also provided her with “multiple options”, including calling them on the phone.  Debt collectors just love it when you call them because they can use their “power over” tactics on you to verbally beat you into submission and get you to pay.  This is why I’ve always said, “put it in writing”, no matter what.

Page 10 of this ruling clearly indicates the Court deemed that “intra-section variation strongly signals that § 1692g permits oral disputes.”   Page 11 also indicates that if you call up and dispute the validity of the debt, without putting it in writing, the debt collector can continue its collection efforts. Putting the dispute in writing (and sending it certified mail, return receipt requested) puts the debt collector on official notice and starts the clock ticking, wherein a response is due immediately.   Pages 12 and 13 bring to bear the “that dog won’t hunt” argument against overreaching in an interpretation of the law to get it to mean what you want it to mean.

Frankly, when debt collectors used to call me … I knew what my rights were and I pinned their ears back with FDCPA and challenged them on everything they said, telling them to “put it in writing” so I have something to take them to court on.  Arguing over the phone is like electricity, the path of least resistance, especially when it comes to enforcing your rights under the law.  There is no easy way out.  If you want debt collectors to do anything, maintaining your right to engage them on the phone is just as good as doing it in right because it saves you time and a stamp … well, now it appears you’re grasping at straws.

More importantly, the Third Circuit didn’t want to upstage Congressional intent when it wrote the language into the law by attempting to “correct a congressional error” and make its own law out of what Congress intended, thus “rescuing Congress from its drafting errors”.

Even more importantly, the Third Circuit also delineated the difference between a “panel ruling” and the effectiveness and superior trait of an “en banc” ruling (the entire appellate court).  It’s important to really get into those pages (18-21) and the discussion involving the differences in opinions (a real educational plus).  Stare decisis is also covered within this discussion, which, if nothing more, is good in of itself for educational enlightenment. Not only that, the Third Circuit overturned one of its previous decisions as to “oral disputes” based on the lack of FDCPA language!

In issuing the ruling, the Third Circuit clearly made it plain and simple that if you want the FDCPA to work in your favor with “no legal impediments” … then stop being lazy, quit arguing with the debt collector over the phone … and put your demands in writing so the law will firmly support you when you file an FDCPA suit!

INVESTOR WINS HOA FORECLOSURE SALE SUIT IN NEVADA!  

There’s no doubt that homeowners associations wield a lot of power.  In some states, like Nevada, after a period of time with no challenge, the parties purchasing HOA-foreclosed properties can wipe out a debt without it being considered “super priority” lien status.  Such was the case here:

Berberich v Bank of America et al, 136 Nev 10 (Mar 26, 2020)

I just love the way the Nevada Supreme Court writes its opinions … short and sweet and easy to understand.  Thus, I’m not going to be verbose here.  What this boils down to is why we have appellate and supreme courts … district court judges are always “looking out for the banks” and have a tendency to “err on the side of … ”  (I didn’t say “caution”).

What this all boils down to is chain of title.  The possessor of the property held it in title for nearly 6-1/2 years and sought declaratory relief to extinguish the deed of trust which secured a prior owner’s mortgage (if you need a full-blown course on cancellation and expungement actions, you can get it HERE!) loan.

The Plaintiff even sued MERS (which I wouldn’t have done … but) because it was a MERS-originated deed of trust.  Bank of America, N.A., which appears to have little regard for quiet title actions, especially when it comes to their alleged “skin in the game”, argued the Plaintiff’s complaint was untimely.  The Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment (meaning no triable issues of fact) and the District Court (looking out for the banks like these judges always do), ruled against the Plaintiff, who timely appealed.  Like the previous case I discussed here … again, relevance to prior case law comes up as to actions to quiet title and considering the statute’s “plain meaning”.  The importance of the plain language is clearly clarified in this ruling:

“Now taking a closer look at the statutes plain language, we clarify that the limitations period provided by NRS 11.080 only starts to run when the plaintiff has been deprived of ownership or possession of the property.

Thus, considering the statutory text as a whole, we conclude the limitations period in NRS 11.080 does not run against a plaintiff seeking to quiet title while still seized or possessed of the property.4 See Kerr, 74 Nev. at 272-73, 329 P.2d at 281 (indicating in dicta that NRS 11.080 did not apply where the plaintiff was in joint possession of the property “up to the very time when he commenced his action” to set aside a deed based on fraud and failure of consideration).

Consistent with this understanding of NRS 11.080, the limitations period is triggered when the plaintiff is ejected from the property or has had the validity or legality of his or her ownership orpossession of the property called into question. See, e.g., Salazar v. Thomas, 186 Cal. Rptr. 3d 689, 695 (Ct. App. 2015) (discussing the general rule in California, which has a statute almost identical to NRS 11.080, see Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 318, that “whether a statute of limitations bars an action to quiet title may turn on whether the plaintiff is in undisturbed possession of the lane (quoting Mayer v. L&B Real Estate, 185 P.3d 43, 46 (Cal. 2008))).

“[M] ere notice of an adverse claim is not enough to commence the owner’s statute of limitations.”

Thus, Nevada’s highest court found that the statute does not bar a property owner who is in possession of a piece of property from bringing a quiet title action; however, the statute of limitations begins to run once the owner has notice of disturbed possession.  Since that wasn’t established (as to disturbed possession), the en banc high court reversed and remanded the case back to the district court with instructions!

U.S. BANK SCREWS MAINE HOMEOWNER … BUT WERE ALL THE DUCKS IN A ROW?

The State of Maine’s Supreme Court has come out with some pretty damning case law against the banks, especially when MERS is involved.  I will cite the most important “take aways” from this case and also get into the real “red meat” that appeared to have been missed.  Read the case first:

US Bank NA v Gordon, 2020 ME 33 (Mar 17, 2020)

First, since a REMIC was involved, no one bothered to question whether the assignment was bogus. No one questioned as to whether the appellant-homeowner was really in default, as there is enough language out there (in the mortgage loan community) to indicate that on the 25th day (or so) of every month, the servicer makes advance payments to the investors through the Trustee.  So then, the question becomes, who was harmed?  The borrower didn’t have a contract with the servicer.

No one bothered to challenge the endorsement either. As always is a precursor in the First Circuit, most court cases discuss MERS “nominee” status in the recording of the mortgage (as if MERS has some glorious, all-powerful rights vested in it because it’s an “agent”).  It also appears that the servicer may have executed a phony “ratification of assignment”, which memorialized the previous 2009 assignment.  This of course, happened RIGHT BEFORE foreclosure proceedings were commenced.  The Borrower of course, challenged standing based on his claim that the ratification was “inadmissible hearsay” and that even if admissible, it was insufficient to prove U.S. Bank’s ownership interest in the mortgage.

Page 3 clearly explains the effects of a recorded document under subheading “A”.  Not once did I see (and you can fact check me if you want to) an attempt to do a C&E on either the assignment or the ratification that was used to give more “legal effect” to the first bogus act (in 2009).  Gordon had plenty of opportunity to challenge the validity of these documents under M.R.S. Title 17A, Ch. 29. Nor did Gordon attempt to destroy the validity of these documents by civilly putting forth a cause of action under the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (Title 5 §§ 207 and 213). Maine has existing case law that allows for documents to be challenged, cancelled and expunged … Abbott v. Treat, 78 ME 121 (1886) … and that is an OLD, WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE!

Once these two documents were challenged, Greenleaf and Saunders, Maine’s two infamous anti-MERS cases, could have then come into play here.

In other words, you can’t create and record one phony document to give the first phony document more legal force and effect when the first phony document was full of false and misrepresentative statements (constituting perjury on the land record).

There was no discussion on the authority of the MERS (potential) “robosigner” on the first 2009 assignment of mortgage.  Despite all of the colorful “resolutions” that MERS puts out into the marketplace in an attempt to give its “agency” status some sort of God-complex-like authority, its “Certifying Officers” have to have a fidelity bond and an errors and omissions insurance policy, naming them as insured.  Lacking this, the signers lack authority to do anything, except to go into a closet and play with themselves.

It also further appears that Gordon had a “legal aid” attorney representing him, which is another reason the attorney probably wasn’t aware of document challenges, which this case appears to have been totally ripe for challenging.  This ruling came out on St. Patrick’s Day … definitely NOT the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.

INTER ALIA … (the Latin term for “among other things”) …

There are other valuable lessons we’re learned through time and that is how the United States (and its individual states) respond to a crisis … like the crisis we’re currently facing.  Despite the fact that this coronavirus has not taken the toll of the Swine Flu, the Avian Flu or most certainly the Spanish Flu, it still shows us that our medical response-ability in this country is sorely lacking.

In Florida, 170 people are now dead as of the 6:00 p.m. count, with 1,334 admitted to hospitals (figure a 50% mortality rate) and 10,268 total cases opened of which 9,925 have tested positive for COVID-19 (figure a 30-40% mortality rate), so we’re looking at over 1,000 dead (just in Florida) before this is all over and we’ve not hit our “apex” yet.  There’s no flattening of any curve (and certainly not our tummies from all of the unhealthy junk food we’ll be consuming the next 30 days) any time soon.  This 30-40% of the cases reported at present (up to 3,200) are at risk of expiring on a ventilator, that they may not get to be put onto because we lack them too.  So now I’m projecting our death toll at well into the thousands before this ends.  The U.S. toll will be much worse, especially in areas of dense populations (Detroit, New Orleans, Chicago, Miami) because … well … that’s just the way things are among the “entitled”. 

The State of Florida goes into a “safer-at-home” mode statewide as of midnight tonight (the 2nd). That does not however mean, that Floridians are going to absolutely “heed” the warnings and stay put.  They’re too used to partying.  I mean, with many in the Sunshine State claiming “retired status”, what else is there to do besides having back yard parties, formal and informal get togethers, golf and boating outings, fishing excursions and hanging out in bars listening to live music, getting hammered on happy hour pricing … along with going out to eat  … Floridians’ favorite pastime and going shopping.

It was obvious we didn’t learn the meaning of social distancing, so the “nanny state” has to kick in and do its thing to remind us we need to be more responsible to each other if we’re going to continue to survive, even in the future as to further pandemics.  And I’ll concede here the Governor’s order was late in coming, but will it have any real impact if peoples’ attitudes remain the same (as if the order hadn’t come at all)?  I’m not faulting the Governor’s delayed reactions.  None of us were prepared for this eventuality and we should have been.

We still lack masks, gowns and respirators.  We still lack toilet paper (because someone out there is wiping their ass a 1,000 times a day) due to hoarding, as well as hand sanitizer (despite reports that it may not be that “sanitary” to use as a foolproof guard (like Lysol) for NOT killing the coronavirus.

I am going to go to the store and buy one bar of Castille Soap (x 4 for 4 bathrooms in my house) and no more, so that I am sure when I wash my hands, ALL of the germs are getting wiped out, as there are questions of whether the “antibacterial” soap, which is supposed to get rid of “bacteria”, which viruses are NOT, is as effective as “they” say.

Among other things, join R.J. Malloy and me on City Spotlight-Special Edition on WKDW-FM this coming Monday at 2 P.M. EDT … click HERE to get online and then click LISTEN NOW to join the broadcast (at 4 minutes past the hour).

Stay safe and stay healthy (I’m still doing the Allimax thing and I’m feeling great! allimax.us).

A BIT DISCONCERTING UPDATE … 

Stuff has been circulating about that is a bit inflammatory and disconcerting as to some folks’ deep-seated feelings about Americans (click the photo to enlarge it and click the back button to return to the article):

I can safely say that not all of the Chinese feel this way. There is a certain segment of any population that has deep-seated resentment for someone or some group of people. Take for instance, the polarization that has occurred within the two-party system in this country. Why does it occur?  Because the media and the political pundits have been successful in pushing peoples’ hot buttons. It has forced societal upheaval that will compound the issues surrounding this pandemic.

I have not heard the latest socio-economic data on the “end result” this pandemic could have on America, but if people do not become united in the effort to “stay at home” and slow down the spread of COVID-19, this pandemic will take more lives than the Civil War (1861-65) did.  For those feeling “entitled” … you are “entitled” to your opinion … and you are “entitled” to stay home and be safe as well.  Again, the larger the population center, the more likely the spread of the virus because people feel the need to be around other people.

“Gee, I just found out I have the coronavirus.  I think I’ll go visit Grandma and give it to her. Then I’ll go visit my sister and give it to her and her kids. Then I’ll go to the local shopping mall and cough all over the place and give it to as many people as I can, because I have little regard for anyone else’s life if I’m on my way out the door!”

The foregoing paragraph may sound sarcastic; however, history has shown us that there are people out there in society who behave this way.  Bottom line … if you treat the situation as that everyone you know has it … you are only safe at home.  Like Dorothy said when she clicked her heels together 3 times … “There’s no place like home.”

 

Leave a comment

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED

REMEMBER WHO THE ENEMY IS …

(BREAKING NEWS) — The author of this post is issuing this update to give you a bit more incentive to participate in the upcoming online COTA Workshop.  The information presented here is for educational purposes only; however, it’s based on years of research by this author and through discussions with attorneys who have utilized this material to their benefit. 

For those of you who are being exposed to COTA (an acronym for Chain Of Title Assessment) for the first time, or wish to intensify the study into the COTA for future use in helping others (and making a sideline income from your knowledge you’ve obtained here), let’s briefly delve into what the chain of title is and how the COTA differs from a simple “title report” issued by today’s title companies across America.

(1) Assists in identifying all known potential claimants to property

It doesn’t matter whether you’re buying a home for the first time or putting your faith in a landlord who claims to own the home he’s renting to you, it pays to understand “who’s on title”. In this day and age, more and more issues of fraudulent transfer and assignments of lien have permeated hundreds of thousands of land records, if not by crooks attempting to commit identity theft by recording false deeds, but by the very banks and secondary players “in the game” that created assignments out of thin air and caused them to be placed into the public record, all since the 2008 financial collapse!  Simply looking at the deed to a piece of property isn’t enough. The aftermath that followed the collapse (2009-2015) has been proven by this author and others to have been one giant scheme to steal property across America by some very unscrupulous sponsor-sellers on Wall Street using phony documents to get their way.  If you or this author ever attempted to do what the banks did, we’d be in jail, because the government is in bed with the banks!  The COTA helps you to identify those person(s) who say they have an interest in the property, whether by claim of ownership or by lien interest.

(2) Assists in identifying potential unknown intervening assignees

Many do not recognize the word “mesne”.  It’s pronounced “mine”.  It’s a legal term that means unidentified players within the chain of title and these players became unknown “assignees” through the use of an electronic database called Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (or “MERS”).  If you’ve read Clouded Titles, you know that MERS is currently operating under its third incorporated version, taken over in October of 2018 by the same corporate outfit that owns the New York Stock Exchange, ICE (an acronym for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.). The mesne assignees entered the chain of title to millions of pieces of property through the use of the MERS System®.  This workshop will teach you the fundamentals of how securitization operates and just how the silent invasion of millions of phony documents entered the public recording system. It’s knowledge that has cost over 10-million Americans their homes because they didn’t have that knowledge when they took out their mortgage loans way back when.  If this workshop could save you tens of thousands of dollars in mistakes, wouldn’t that be worth it?

(3) Assists in identifying abuse to the title by lien holders & clients 

It goes without saying that millions of Americans have fallen prey to the scheme of obfuscation within the chain of title by parties that all of a sudden “claimed” an interest in any given piece of property in America simply by creating an assignment of mortgage (or deed of trust) with the intention of giving the recorded instrument legal effect for the purposes of foreclosure.  The banks and the financial industry supporting the use of MERS then proceeded to infiltrate all 3,041 public records through the use of legislation, which more than likely came into being through the use of “monetary incentives” (i.e., “the best congress money can buy”) to get legislation passed to allow a “book entry system” to permeate the land records all across America through the use (and abuse) of documents that were vague and ambiguous, which this author first discussed in the very first COTA Workshop he ever taught, as a CLE to attorneys in Texas. Now you can have access to that same information, which could help you in making what could be life and death decisions!

(4) Assists in identifying potential causes of action for use in litigation

The one thing for certain in America is that these abuses within “the system of things” has made the greater percentage of the citizens in this country litigious in one way, shape or form. The remains of those who have been foreclosed upon in the past have paved the road with bad case law because they (and their attorneys) fought with bad information, information that was passed through the legal forums throughout America by attorneys who became part of a very widespread network of what are known as foreclosure mills.  Some have fallen by the wayside, while others have only gained in strength by setting case law in their favor before most Americans (who were foreclosure victims, and their lawyers) realized what kind of legal charade was being falsely portrayed within the judicial venues throughout this country.  This author is convinced that all of this was by design, to give these foreclosure mills lots of work and as one attorney this author knows put it, “How to steal people’s homes for fun and profit.”  Sadly, 97% of all affected homeowners cut and ran, leaving the system to its own devices.  Those who fought the banks and their servicers found out the hard way that claiming “fraud” costs money … more money than the average American homeowner anticipated spending to stay in their home. There’s a right way and a wrong way to understand “the game” … and you’ll learn that in this workshop!

(5) Establishes proof of ownership in the chain of title (deraignment)

Here’s a term (deraignment) that most people don’t understand the concept of.  In this workshop, the author is going to show you not only what this term means, but how it’s applied in law!

(6) Establishes parameters for given time periods of recordation (laches)

The doctrine of laches kind of works like a ticking clock.  Many Americans have been duped into believing that once they’ve found out that they were “screwed over” by the banks, they attempted to file lawsuits against the banks and MERS, something the banks were geared up in advance to wage a winning war against these unsuspecting homeowners and their attorneys, who soon found out that there were more ways of making money than by doing simple wills and estate planning.  Welcome to the understanding of what makes a foreclosure defense lawyer tick … your paycheck in his trust account!  Laches is further explained in the COTA Workshop … which can be taken via the internet right from your very own home computer.

(7) Establishes proper document recordation value (as to sequence)

It’s not just a recorded document that makes a difference … it’s how all of the documents in the chain of title interrelate to each other.  We’re going to go into detail by showing you case studies within the COTA Workshop so you can gain an understanding of how these abuses within the chain of title occurred and how the COTA is used to formulate litigation.

(8) Establishes proper evidence to identify potential problems with title

If you had a way to identify issues within your chain of title, wouldn’t that make your understanding of future litigation more practical?  This is why so many attorneys across America have read Clouded Titles. In fact, this book (written by the author who is teaching this online COTA Workshop) was recommended to homeowners by U.S. Bankruptcy Court Trustees!  This means that the information contained within this book (and this author’s subsequent teachings) was very quickly picked up by “the system” and integrated into its database of legal knowledge.  As a bonus … for those of you taking the online COTA Workshop … you’re going to receive a complimentary copy of this book that has gotten the attention of even the federal judiciary!  Suing for everything under the sun (including the kitchen sink) is a big waste of time and money.  This online COTA Workshop will teach you the basics of understanding what the aspects of litigation are and how you, as a past, present and future homeowner, can benefit from understanding the fundamental issues within chains of title that have been affected by the schemes perpetrated by the banks and their henchmen.  This goes way beyond what title companies will ever reveal … because the title companies are “in on it”!

(9) Raises potential legal issues based on research of statutory violations

This author has written other publications which explore the universe of legal claims based on violations of statute.  Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to understand how and where to find this information … and the author will show you how in the online COTA Workshop!

(10) Raises potential legal issues based on unproven but evident fraud

Fraud! Fraud! Fraud!  That’s all this author hears homeowners bleat (like sheep to the slaughter).  Learn what the potential legal issues are without becoming a victim of them!  It’s a very expensive proposition … something this author knows could save you tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees just by your gaining an understanding of how you (as a homeowner) have been duped.

(11) Raises awareness of concern by the Preparer as to legal consideration

If you were going to help others (while making a living doing COTAs) avoid these same pitfalls, wouldn’t it be nice to know exactly HOW the author came to understand the fundamental concept of how the chain of title works?  Spending tens of thousands of dollars in litigation costs makes everyone but you (the homeowner) rich.  Why drop that big dime if you can possibly avoid it?  We’ll even be discussing quiet title and the use of declaratory judgment actions as a part of the common strategy to get to the truth of the matter involving chain of title!

(12) Raises the stakes of potential legal claims for damages

Out of these dozen reasons why you should consider taking this online COTA Workshop … if you had a clear and concise understanding of what you were up against and knew the real issues within your chain of title (or could research the chain of title for a prospective property you wish to acquire as a means of building equity), wouldn’t it be nice to know that once you’re all settled in, you’re not going to become a victim of foreclosure by some unscrupulous lender, based on those mesne assignees this author talked about in the beginning of this post?  If you knew which legal claims were more profitable than others, wouldn’t that be a good thing?

The online COTA Workshop begins February 1st (that’s this coming Saturday) … why not start out the New Year with a chunk of knowledge that can not only save you thousands of dollars in legal fees, but also give you the opportunity to make a decent living while helping others avoid the pitfalls that have cost millions of Americans dearly.

Click here to register to attend! 

In addition, if you missed something … after taking the online COTA Workshop … we’ll make these sessions available to you online so you can further your studies and pick up the nuggets you may have missed while attending the online COTA Workshop … all of which you can access FREE OF CHARGE, with your paid attendance to the workshop!

Plus, by attending the online COTA Workshop, you get a complimentary copy of the book Clouded Titles!

The webinar platform will give you a chance to ask questions at the Q&A breaks in the class too!  

Knowledge is power!

The clock is ticking … what are you waiting for?

A summons to appear in court or a notice of default?

Don’t be a victim!

Arm yourself with education!

Click here to register to attend! 

 

2 Comments

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, Securitization Issues, webinar, workshop