Tag Archives: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc.

FORECLOSURE DEFENSE WORKSHOP IN LAS VEGAS: THE C&E ON STEROIDS!

(BREAKING NEWS) — Due to the nature of the current situation involving the millions of false and misrepresentative assignments littering all of the land records in America, DK Consultants LLC has ramped up its educational attack on the system of things versus those millions of suspect assignments and other documents!  

Clouded Titles author Dave Krieger and California quiet title attorney Al West have teamed up once again to bring you a workshop so specific in nature to the real culprits in the foreclosure arena, we couldn’t keep this quiet any longer!  We wrote a book about it … it’s THE C&E ON STEROIDS! A Layman’s Guide to Cancellation & Expungement Actions!

We’ve put together a tw0-day workshop that gets into the nuts and bolts of the documents that should send mortgage loan servicers and their employees running for cover!

The Cancellation & Expungement (C & E) action is not widely understood, yet with the right ammo, foreclosure defense attorneys can “up their odds” of winning or settling their cases in knowing the information we’ve collected over time can be massively useful to their game plan … so … after much debate we had to share it with everyone!  There is a BEST TIME, an OKAY TIME and a WORST POSSIBLE TIME to do a C&E; however, the ammo we have makes all three potential outcomes for success achievable!

THERE’S A REASON … 

You’ve heard that there have been multiple actions against the MERS® System and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s beneficial and nominee status.  If you want to defeat that in your suspect assignment you need the C & E!  With over 80-million homes affected by these assignments, can you imagine the business model you could engage in marketing your services to attorneys and homeowners as a BUSINESS?   These assignments are going to have to get knocked out and if the U.S. Supreme Court decides that MERS is not a valid beneficiary and isn’t really a nominee on your mortgage or deed of trust … imagine how many pissed off homeowners there are going to be that all want to execute on a legal sniper attack on their chain of title that you already have the ammunition for … do you see a business opportunity here?

What are you waiting for?

The downloadable forms you need to attend are right here: LAS VEGAS FORECLOSURE DEFENSE WORKSHOP INFORMATION

Book your sleeping room for this event by clicking on this link: : http://group.doubletree.com/ForeclosureDefense

We got a really great room rate and FREE breakfast buffet! Seating is limited!

THE FALSE ASSUMPTION

There is a false assumption that has floated about for years about how to deal with these assignments and running into court screaming “FRAUD!” at the judge is NOT the answer.  You will lose your case every time without the necessary precursors and attack plans.  So we’re getting together in Las Vegas to bring you the actual “procedures” used in previously successful cases to show you that if any attorney were to employ this out of the gate … we would be saving you thousands of dollars and years of “delay games”!  Everyone wants a “finite end” to the foreclosure mess.  One thing is for sure … over 80-million land records have bogus assignments in them … all residue from the mortgage crisis … and these suspect assignments aren’t going away by themselves!  They will continue to sit there and rot your chain of title until you challenge them and have them removed.   The false assumption by most Americans is … it doesn’t matter what’s in the land records … as long as I get to stay in my home.  This false assumption is what has hurt America.  And the banks and their scumbag mortgage loan servicers continue to get away with “doing the dirty”.

Why would you want to throw good money away that you could use for Plan B (on useless litigation strategies), when you can employ strategies that will not only “get the message across” to the judge in such a way that it FORCES him to do the right thing versus throwing spaghetti noodles at a wall to see which one sticks?  If homeowners could think like investors … we wouldn’t be in this mess.  But they don’t … and we are.

Take the emotion out of your foreclosure and think STRATEGY!   Think of the most damning thing about your chain of title.  What is it?   The assignment, right?  Or maybe you have multiple assignments that are screwing with any common sense that’s left in the chain of title aside from the lack of marketability of title, right?

THE NUTS AND BOLTS

Al West and I have taken these “nuts and bolts” and put them into a working manual that allows you to:

  1. Determine the best process for attacking the right parties in the right venue;
  2. Determine the timeliness of employing said strategies and manage your case costs more efficiently;
  3. Determine how to send the bank’s attorneys into a panic over discovery pointed straight at them like a Howitzer;
  4. Determine how to formulate an attack plan to take out single or multiple targets at the same time;
  5. Determine the best way to shut down your foreclosure case by bringing in the necessary muscle to put the bank attorney’s head on a chopping block; and
  6. Determine the best way to keep your case in play until you’ve achieved finality … and then take out the law firm that brought you this misery in the first place!

Not only that … we’re going to show you HOW TO create a business model attacking notary bonds and making tens of thousands of dollars a year in extra income doing it!  Imagine how many notaries’ commissions you can knock out … and you’re just one consumer!   Imagine a horde of informed consumers (with this business model) doing it as a way to fund their litigation!  You get to help mankind out while taking out the unscrupulous scumbags that are attesting to these false and misrepresentative assignments while going after the law firms that ordered these phony assignments to be created in the first place!  The question is: How far are you willing to go to achieve these ends?

After much analysis, we’ve figured out a way to put the Cancellation & Expungement Action (C&E) into “hyperdrive” to:

  1. Take out the other side’s attorney and have him up on misconduct charges before his respective state bar disciplinary committee!  (This attack plan works in all 50 states!)
  2. Show you that if the judge in your case won’t “do the right thing” … how Plan B: (a.) puts him on notice; (b.) sets him up to have his bond attacked; (c.) sets the county up (the county the judge gets a paycheck from in “doing the wrong thing” by ignoring your demands to heed the evidence in your case) to become the new target of your litigation; (d.) turns the county’s ignorance and willful disregard of the law into potential criminal prosecution against the key players in charge and (e.) turns your plight into a 3-ring media circus that the county cannot ignore!  (Believe me, the county DOES NOT want that!)
  3. Take both the judge and the banks’ attorneys up to the next level of disciplinary action while shaming them in the media!

When a cop shoots someone, he gets put on administrative leave, right?   Why?  Because the proper authorities have to investigate to determine whether or not the cop committed a crime (homicide, attempted homicide, etc.) or acted in self-defense.  He’s on desk duty until the investigation is over, no matter how long it takes!

When a judge aids and abets felony perjury, his sovereign immunity as a judge can be challenged in a multitude of ways.  Once the county he works for (and gets a paycheck from) discovers his misconduct, the county by all right and reason should put him on administrative leave.  He’s on desk duty until the investigation is over, no matter how long it takes!   And don’t think the rest of the judges in that county aren’t going to sit up and take notice!  They don’t want their bonding companies investigating them!

THE C & E GOES INTO HYPERDRIVE … ON STEROIDS! 

When you leave this workshop … you will have the necessary tools to:

  1. Arm your attorney with the right offensive ammo to go looking for bear;
  2. Prepare adequate pleadings to put forward an original petition to generate a responsive pleading in a non-judicial setting that sets the other side up for attack;
  3. Prepare adequate responses to alternatively counterclaim or affirmatively defend a foreclosure complaint that sets the other side up for attack in a judicial setting;
  4. Use BOTH #2 and #3 to set the trap … and 9 times out of 10, the arrogant bank attorneys will fall for it and put their law licenses in harm’s way;
  5. How to posture discovery to trap the bank’s attorneys in a web of their own making;
  6. How to make use of expert witness testimony to attack false assignments and set the attack plan into motion to get the attorney for the bank in hot water;
  7. How to make use of expert witness testimony to assert negligent misrepresentation on the part of the bank’s lawyer;
  8. Start your own business putting notary’s out of business (and maybe even getting them prosecuted for felony perjury);
  9. How to make proper use of discovery to buy you month’s … even years of delays … because it’s so lethal the bank’s attorneys won’t answer it; and
  10. How to do all of the foregoing while keeping your emotions in check and your cards close to the chest!

Think of how much money you could save by implementing this attack plan!

YOU ARE THE SNIPER!

If you’ve read the 10-part series, “Gutting the Underbelly of the Beast” … we’re going to show you the system of things in hyperdrive … using the C & E as bait to go after the other side’s lawyers and foreclosure trustees!   (Lord knows they all need to be in jail, right?)

And the best part of it … we’ll SHOW you written proof that what we’re teaching in this two-day event is working in the courts RIGHT NOW!

AND … we’ll provide you with the business model and the design plans to attack notary bonds and make money doing it!

The question is … are you willing to commit to fighting the good fight?

Are you willing to do a strategic sniper approach and stop throwing good money after bad?

Then you need to be at this workshop!

The downloadable forms you need to attend are right here: LAS VEGAS FORECLOSURE DEFENSE WORKSHOP INFORMATION

Book your sleeping room for the event by clicking this link: : http://group.doubletree.com/ForeclosureDefense

We got a really great room rate and FREE breakfast buffet! Seating is limited!

The ammunition you’re going to gain by attending this workshop is unlike anything we’ve published before; however, what we discussed in brief in The Quiet Title War Manual we’re going to expound upon in this two-day workshop!  Since Al West and I wrote the book … we’ve figured out the game plan and the attack strategies!

You get a copy of The C & E on Steroids! book just for attending!  

(No one else will have this manual but you until months from now! You get a head start!)

This book shows you everything you need to employ the Cancellation & Expungement Action (C&E), including:

1. Sample court filing forms!

2. Sample pleadings used in other cases resulting in a positive outcome!

3. Exhibits used in other cases that worked!

4. Orders issued by courts in C & E actions that have worked!

5. Tactics used to combat the other side’s attempt to get sanctions against you!

6. Use of expert witnesses to expose the other side’s weaknesses!

And since this Workshop is in Las Vegas … here’s Lucky No. 7: Four different attack roadmap strategies for each case!

You get written handouts at the workshop that show you step-by-step assignment analysis (to identify your targets!)

1. Assignment and target analysis!

2. Research components used in case development!

3. How to couple a C&E with a quiet title action!

4. How to determine what legal provisions apply to your case!

5. Steps to take to beat the banks in HOA foreclosure cases! (Great for investors!)

6. Use of the notary to get at the rest of the singular or multiple targets!

You or someone you know needs this information … and seating is limited!  You’ll get hands-on approach training at this workshop! 

The downloadable forms you need to attend are right here: LAS VEGAS FORECLOSURE DEFENSE WORKSHOP INFORMATION

Book your sleeping room at the hotel by visiting this link: http://group.doubletree.com/ForeclosureDefense

We got a really great room rate and FREE breakfast buffet! Seating is limited!

Here is the Registration Form to Attend: FDW REGISTRATION FORM_LAS VEGAS_2019

6 Comments

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, Securitization Issues, workshop

MERS AND ITS ROLE AS A PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT … OR THE LACK THEREOF!

(OP-ED) — This is an educational overview as to what has taken place in the American legal forums in the last two decades and my take on what it all means:

UPDATE: Please see my comments to Lori’s question in the comments section as to Bank of America’s claimed “successor by merger” BS to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP fka Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP, especially using MERS to hide the real truth!

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

On January 1, 1999, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and its parent MERSCORP, Inc. (“MERSCORP”), surfaced as a new brainchild of the mortgage industry after two previously-failed efforts to put an effective electronic database into useable form.

MERSCORP is the “brain” part of  the “brainchild” … Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. is the “child” part of the “brainchild”.

The acronym known as “MERS” was attached to the “brainchild” to further confuse the system of things from being able to specifically identify whether the parent or the baby bastard child is coming into play at any given moment.

According to research done by Robert M. Janes, J.D. (retired attorney) in his work SHELLGAME MERS, Contrived Confusion (available at esprouts.com), the “MERS” known in mortgages and deeds of trust as Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. HAS NO “MEMBERS”, despite what attorneys for “MERS” have told judges all across America.  The entire system of things has bought into this crap.  Our entire judicial system has been permeated with lies.  As Hitler’s propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels stated (paraphrased), “tell a lie long enough and often enough and people will come to believe it as truth.”

MERSCORP however owned everything known as the MERS® System, up until the time that Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE”, who also owns the New York Stock Exchange) bought MERSCORP and all of its assets and transferred all of the MERS servers to Mahwah, New Jersey, where ICE’s data servers are located.  This happened in October of 2018.  From February of 2012 until October of 2018, MERSCORP was merged into MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. and operated as such until ICE acquired it.

MERSCORP had all of the “Members” who technically are users and subscribers of its “MERS® System”.   They have an executory contract with MERSCORP.  As far as I can tell, when ICE acquired MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., ALL of the databases, memberships and every other facet of MERS went with the sale and transfer to ICE.

These latest developments also beg the question: Do I have to sue Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. if I want to go after MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., since ICE now owns MERSCORP?   That’s a question for counsel to answer; however, I personally wouldn’t sue either one of them, knowing what I know about NOT giving MERS a “leg up” … and given the fact that MERSCORP is now backed by the power of Wall Street funding!

MERS WANTS TO BE “ALL THINGS TO ALL PEOPLE”

Unfortunately for MERS, one State (Tennessee)’s Supreme Court gutted MERS’s business model like a chicken in the Ditto decision.  See attached:

MERS v DITTO_TN Supreme Court rules against MERS!

Unfortunately for the other 49 States, their respective Supreme Courts did not issue a ruling as succinctly as Tennessee’s ruling was.   Only Washington (Bain), Oregon (Niday and Brandrup), Montana (Pilgeram), Maine (Greenleaf and Saunders), New York (Agard, Bresler, Collymore and Silverberg), Kansas (Kesler), Arkansas (SW Homes), Nebraska (Dept. of Banking and Finance) and Missouri (Bellistri) did some damage to the MERS® System, but nowhere near the damage inflicted in Ditto.

Sadly, for the rest of the country, especially in Minnesota (Jackson) and Michigan (Sauerman), where the foregoing cases have propelled the MERS business model into fruition, homeowners in those states (except Minnesota and Michigan, where homeowners are essentially f**cked) have a long, uphill battle against any securitized trust that made use of the MERS® System to do its bidding.

REPUDIATION AGREEMENTS: A POTENTIAL WAY OUT

If you were lucky enough to have a mortgage loan originated by New Century Mortgage Corporation or Fieldstone Mortgage Company, you may have a legal solution as a possibility to consider in maneuvering through the legal pitfalls created by the use of MERS in your mortgage security instrument.

To date, to my knowledge and research, these two entities were the only two entities that had executory contracts with MERSCORP (or any form thereafter) repudiated their contracts with the MERS® System and its owner/parent MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.    See the attached below:

NCMC Notice of Repudiation

The foregoing repudiation was validated in the case of DiLibero v. MERS in Rhode Island.  I like to use this case because the Rhode Island Supreme Court likes to rub homeowners’ noses in MERS’s bullshit every chance it gets because Little Rhody’s lower courts have bought into the lies propounded by MERSCORP-retained attorneys.

See the case here: DiLibero v MERS_2015-13-190

In a previous post, I talked about the positive outcome of using the repudiation agreement as a means to assert the lack of standing of the Plaintiff Bank, unlike what happened in the Cruz v MERS case, where Cruz lost because he didn’t use the repudiation agreement. Duh?  (Was Cruz or his attorney even aware of this?)

See the case here: Cruz v. MERS_2015-12-136

The second known notice of repudiation was filed in the bankruptcy case of Fieldstone Mortgage Company, in a rather voluminous omnibus filing:

Fieldstone Mortgage Bankruptcy

As I teach in my COTA Workshops, repudiation of a contract in a Chapter 11 proceeding is like taking a dump.   Getting rid of excess baggage that could potentially weigh you down as to legal issues coming back to bite you in the ass.

In what I’ve just presented, both entities unilaterally decided they didn’t want to play in the MERS® System any further because they deemed it a potential liability and thus NOTICED MERS that they were ending their relationship with MERSCORP.  This has provided at least one homeowner with an “out”.

In what I deem is a “new twist” to the equation, the New York-based law firm of Jenner & Block (where Neil Barofsky works), issued a memo, dated January (2019), entitled “Recent Developments in Bankruptcy Law”, wherein Section 9 talks about “executory contracts” and where the debtor in possession (of whatever is part of the debtor’s estate or business) does not need court approval to repudiate (or cancel) an executory contract (see below):

NOTE: Click on the picture to see it in full size!

For a full copy of the report (in PDF format): Recent Developments in Bankruptcy Law, Jan 2019 (Jenner & Block)

What does THIS SAY for Chapter 11 petitioners who repudiate MERSCORP executory contracts NOT needing court approval?   How do you know a MERSCORP executory contract with a so-called “MERS Member” was cancelled by the Chapter 11 debtor unless you ask about it (in discovery)?   Would you care to go rummaging through bankruptcy court filings (at ten cents a page)?   The repudiation agreement by the defunct lender or notice of such may not even be in there!

MERS AS A PLAINTIFF

In the states that allow Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. to file a foreclosure action against a borrower, MERS is simply claiming that it’s exercising its right to foreclose per the language in the security instrument.  In some cases I’ve seen, MERS’s attorneys even come in and attempt to claim a surplus after the sale, even though MERS itself receives no payments, incurs no financial harm, etc. (see Restatement of Mortgages, Third § 5.4), which I think the law firm is clearly attempting to pilfer whatever surplus it can get for its own gains and not those of MERS or its parent.

The problem I have with MERS being anywhere near a foreclosure is not so much the contractual angle, but the damage angle, based on the Spokeo v. Robins decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.  How was MERS damaged?    In the Robinson case in California, MERS plead to the 9th Circuit (as part of getting the appellate court to affirm the lower court’s ruling) that its business model would be harmed if the appellate court didn’t rule in its favor.  You see how the lie permeates into the appellate court system?

Sadly, I liken MERSCORP CEO Bill Beckmann and his Board of Directors as a little Hitler and his band of little crony “yes-men”.   They all need to be in jail!  And speaking of Hitler …

MERS AS A DEFENDANT

The main reason that MERS (as Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) is listed as a Defendant in foreclosure cases is because the Plaintiff REMIC or servicer (posing as the party claiming to have the right to enforce the security instrument) wants to notice MERS in order for MERSCORP employees to check the database to make sure that there aren’t any other “mesne assignees” hiding somewhere within the chain of custody of the electronic trading going on involving that alleged loan, in order to provide a “clearing” of potential unknown Defendants that may come in later and file a claim in the case.

THE SUPREME COURT HAS (TO DATE) NOT ALLOWED ANTI-MERS CASES TO COME BEFORE IT

Writs of Certiorari have tried and failed.  However, I still believe that we will continue to see more MERS-related decisions appealed to the nation’s highest court until the matter of MERS’s flawed business model and the damage it has inflicted on over 80-million homes finally gets resolved.

THE BOTTOM LINE IS STILL THE ASSIGNMENTS: THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS! 

Again, if you go into the back of The Quiet Title War Manual, you will see state-by-state listings of statutes that cover certain elements of law involving quiet title, declaratory relief, deficiency judgment law, etc. … and below that section, three individual paragraphs on actionable statutes and case law involving violation of statute in the recording of documents into the land records which contain false information (many of which are felony-rooted in nature) or violate provisions of state consumer protection act laws.  We are now (based on my past posts) seeing the use of these mechanisms in attacking the banks’ attorney(s) (because sometimes there is more than one attorney or law firm involved in any given foreclosure) in turning a statutory violation into an ethical violation!

When a foreclosure mill attorney is put “at risk” of being suspended or being disbarred for suborning perjury, committing perjury or some other ethical misconduct, do you really think he (or she) is going to want to stay in the fight?   Further, what future substituted law firm would want to step “into the pile of poop” created by the first law firm, knowing it would put itself “at risk” of having its Errors & Omissions insurance policy attacked?

Things To Watch Out For …

  1. Any entity that has filed for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy before 2010 … as to whether they got court approval to repudiate the MERSCORP executory contract.

This provides you with a potential argument (or at least an affirmative defense to a foreclosure) that MERS and its alleged “agents” (“officers’)  for the “nominee” has any authority that was repudiated by the originating lender (debtor-in-possession);

2.  Assignments dated AFTER the originating lender filed for bankruptcy (easily discovered on Google or Google Scholar).

You especially want to check for language within the assignments (of mortgage or deed of trust) that says, “together with the Note”, because MERS cannot transfer what it does not have an interest in.   Secondly, not many people argue that there is no specific right delegated to MERS to “assign” anything.   Thirdly, NOTES ARE NEGOTIATED … not transferred or assigned; and

3.  Any mortgage foreclosure complaints, notices of trustee’s sale or similar notices that reflect that MERS has any authority to do anything, specific to the state of the union you are in.

Certain states, as I’ve mentioned before, do NOT allow MERS to do much of anything, while in other states, MERS can pretty much steamroller over homeowners.

My question is, why are you still living there?   Or better yet, why haven’t you attacked the assignments in Consumer Protection or statutory claims?

The Devil Is In The Details

Always check the assignment of mortgage or deed of trust for:

  1. Self-dealing (by the servicer and its employees);
  2. Claims that the note was “assigned” in addition to the mortgage or deed of trust by MERS;
  3. Names and addresses of law firms involved in the assignment;
  4. Names and addresses of title companies involved in the assignment;
  5. Names and addresses of servicers involved in the assignment that claim the Plaintiff’s address is in c/o the servicer’s address;
  6. Names of known robosigners involved in the assignment;
  7. Names of notaries participating in the assignment that are acknowledging under PENALTY OF PERJURY;
  8. Phony MERS addresses (like their alleged Ocala, Florida address, which actually belonged to Electronic Data Systems);
  9. Dates of assignments that well post-date the REMIC’s 424(b)(5) Prospectus Cut-Off and Closing Dates;
  10. Post-dating or back-dating of the assignment; and
  11. Documents created in one state that are executed in another state.

Any of these “details” can be used as evidence to go after the law firm attempting the foreclosure!   And THAT my friends … is how the system of things should work!

Coming soon …

P.S.: Hat tip to David A. Rogers, Esq. of Austin, Texas for the Fieldstone materials!

11 Comments

Filed under OP-ED, Securitization Issues

ENTER 2019 AND THE NEW MERS!

(BREAKING NEWS – OP-ED) —

FYI, NOT for use as legal advice … but for the added benefits of research!

ICE OWNS MERSCORP … and things have changed! 

If you haven’t been paying attention to the “new and improved MERS”, you should be.  As of October of last year, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (“ICE”; the same bunch that owns the New York Stock Exchange) took over MERSCORP Holdings, Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

Two new corporate shills appear to be heading up the parent (MERSCORP Holdings, Inc.).  I got this from the “new and improved MERSinc” website:

How ironic?  The “Goone” squad!  (I know you’re trying to hold back the laughter, but this is serious folks!)

Noticeably missing from the MERSINC.org website is the “Member Search” tool.   Now ICE has made it impossible and further obfuscates WHO is participating as a “user/subscriber of the MERS® System!  Thus, anyone wanting to do research on a MERS-originated mortgage or deed of trust is going to have to ask for their closing documents PRIOR TO signing them.  Otherwise, those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it because THE GOONE SQUAD now controls all of the information in the MERS System!

It also appears that since Goone is connected to the DTCC, he now might have access to every credit transaction conducted throughout the United States!

You can still search for the alleged “Servicer” on the MERS® System website; however, the users of the system are expected to continue to put the same malarkey on the “Investor” portion of the site when you go to access that information, vis a vis entering your personal identifying information, namely, your last name and your social security number.

Let’s be clear one more time … your social security number is actually NOT your number.  It was assigned to you by the Social Security Administration when you volunteered to be in the social in-security program.

My wisdom for 2019 … AVOID MERS MORTGAGES LIKE THE PLAGUE!

Any mortgages or deeds of trust you intend to execute from now on probably should be through the following entities:

(1) credit unions that are NOT user/subscribers to the MERS® System; and

(2) owner financing, or in the alternative, hard money lending, designed to purchase within the short term.

You have every right to walk away from the closing table and not have your property encumbered by “MERS” paper.  You should also do a chain of title search on anything you intend on purchasing because you never know what unknown (mesne) assignees might be lurking in the shadows, just waiting for that inopportune moment to foreclose on you!

My further wisdom for 2019 … TAX DEEDS!

Every state has a system for purchasing tax deeds. Investigate these in the alternative!  You’re helping the county pay its bills, in addition to getting yourself a great deal!

In Florida, for example, you can buy tax deeds at auction for less than assessed value.  In Florida, for example, when you buy a tax deed and your tax deed is recorded, possession is immediate!  You get to own the land (or a single lot; sometimes you can get acreage) outright; however, first investigate to make sure you can put a manufactured home or site built home of smaller proportions (if you’re in the scale-down mode) on such a lot.  Many areas have deed restrictions.  Don’t forget, you still need to quiet the title to the property, but on tax deeds, provided you don’t have to serve a foreign investor or person outside of the U.S., most QT actions take 60-90 days to complete and shouldn’t cost you an arm and a leg.

Whatever “state” of the union you’re in, the county maintains the #1 position for liens, based on payment of property taxes.  The ways of the allodial title have disappeared, despite what you’ve heard from some well-meaning Patriots that claim you can restore a land patent to its original state.  There is an interesting comment from Washington State I found to back that up:

(NOTE: Click on the image to enlarge it to make it easier to read!)

Anyone trying this crap may find themselves on the receiving end of criminal charges because filing false documents into the land records is a felony in almost all 50 states and is punishable under both civil and criminal aspects.  You cannot evade property taxes anywhere.  This is why I like buying tax deeds for less than assessed value … the annual taxes on them is cheap and buying agricultural land (if you can find it) is even better!  It’s a great way to “start over” with less money, especially if you’re reeling from the effects of a foreclosure and are opting NOT TO DEFEND, but rather to move on.  Just make sure that if you’re buying a lot to build on, have a plan to follow through on that quickly.  Don’t buy raw land just for the sake of having a nest egg because you will continue to pay annual property taxes on that land in the future whether you live on that land or not.  Now that industrial hemp is being legalized, build your home out of hemp (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfQbXuTzQQU) like these folks did in Asheville, North Carolina!

I’ve gotten past the point of asking people to simply deed their properties (that they’re about to be foreclosed on) over to me so I can litigate them in court.  If people were that “entitled” in the first place to make bad decisions to buy property using MERS-related securitization, thus screwing up their title, why would I want that headache?  Analyze every deal before engaging it!

MERS generally is never found on the titles to vacant lots!  That’s another plus for buying tax deeds on vacant land you intend on quickly building on.  Being mortgage free is a blessing in this day and age and I can only wish the best for my readers, that they can enjoy the freedom of not owing a bank or a monthly payment to a landlord, if not in 2019, then at some point in the near future.  That might be a great New Year’s resolution to make!  Why become part of the Nation of Renters if you don’t have to?

 

3 Comments

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED

THE ARROGANCE OF BANKS!?

(OP-ED) — The author of this post is not an attorney and none of this should be construed as legal advice but is put forward for educational purposes only. 

No matter what defensive (or offensive) strategy is seemingly employed by homeowners (as borrowers), not only do we still get the same ‘ol, same ‘ol from bank attorneys (who actually represent the mortgage loan servicer and not the owner of the note themselves) as to their defamatory conjecture from “Your Honor, they (meaning the borrower) just want a free house!” … we still get the continued misrepresentation of the facts in a foreclosure action, whether it be judicial or non-judicial in nature.

In a judicial scenario, the arrogance is blatant. The attorney files the foreclosure action (generally employed by a foreclosure mill that gets paid a low winning bid dollar amount) and puts all of the same, standard “trash talk” about the homeowner (as the borrower), claiming the borrower is in default and that it (the client) is entitled to enforce the security instrument.  This isn’t personal really.  It’s a numbers game and if you’re a borrower who hasn’t made his payments in ages, it does not necessary mean that the burden of proof shifts to you, just because it’s your home and you’ve been served with papers which, nine times out of ten, contain pleadings that have notably false and misrepresentative statements contained within them.  In a judicial state, it’s still up to the alleged claimant-Plaintiff to prove its case or go home. This is why the banks want everything changed to non-judicial in nature, so they don’t have to work so hard to steal people’s homes.

Instead, the borrower opts to defend his position by putting forward an answer and affirmative defenses to the Plaintiff’s assertions.  The very act of this filing and anticipated response immediately gives the court jurisdiction to hear the matter before it (with an assigned case number and recorded lis pendens).  At the point of the recording of the lis pendens, the borrower’s title is slandered (not the filing of the case with the applicable court).  It is the notice of lis pendens that gives the world constructive notice of the proceedings against the property because it is the security instrument that the Plaintiff seeks to enforce.  However, in a judicial state, the Plaintiff must possess the Note, or in the alternative, sufficiently demonstrate that it had the note, but lost it, and made every effort to find it, but couldn’t.  Instead of looking for the note (or dummying one up out of nowhere like we know they do) and presenting a complete case, the arrogant bank and its lawyer press forward anyway and prey on the emotion of the court, backed by the reasoning that since they filed a complaint to foreclose, they must be the lender, right?

Generally, when the Plaintiff can’t produce the note, it produces an assignment of mortgage, which is generally “manufactured” by the mortgage loan servicer’s employees in favor of the servicer.  Half the time, the assignment includes the language “together with the note”, which, if MERS is involved, is a physical impossibility because MERS cannot transfer something it does not own.  This makes the assignment false and misrepresentative.  Instead of questioning the tactics of the servicer, on many an occasion, the banks’ own attorneys just take it and run with it, or even worse, are complicit in its manufacture!  This makes it even worse because the bank’s attorney (and law firm) would be suborning perjury, which, the last time I checked, was a felony.  It’s even worse when they try to rely on the assignment to steal the house.  It is the INTENT that is made known when the misrepresentations within the assignment are orally pontificated upon the court by the bank’s attorney in his arguments … thus, the arrogance of the bank is transferred to its lawyer, who can then claim reliance on the document because the attorney (or the “cover lawyer”, different from the attorney who filed the original pleadings) is now at greater than “arm’s length”position from the transaction and thus will claim plausible deniability (as in “I had no idea, Your Honor.”)

In a non-judicial setting, the scenario is much more deceitful.  If the borrower doesn’t stop the proceeding with something factual that can be proven in court, followed by a temporary restraining order, it is assumed that whoever commences a foreclosure action against the property is going to get their wish because going to court is not required in deed of trust states, except in certain cases, which is why the arrogant banks keep trying to lobby legislatures to change their method of enforcing security instruments to non-judicial, because all non-judicial actions do not require a court’s approval and thus all foreclosure actions are deemed legal unless proven otherwise.  This too is a numbers game of greater proportions because most homeowners in deed of trust states do not have access to competent foreclosure defense attorneys because “the system of things” does not warrant a board specialized attorney (in real property law or foreclosure defense) to come forward and shut the door on the foreclosure.  Most attorneys in deed of trust states really don’t know how to defend against foreclosures but they sure know how to structure a business model to take a retainer, followed by monthly payments, making their newly-found client their newly-created annuity payment.  This is great for business because it boosts cash flow.  But, it doesn’t nothing for the homeowner (as the borrower) unless the homeowner has something in the chain of title worth arguing.

Such is the case in South Carolina, where a MERSCORP attorney has allegedly testified under oath (in a deposition) that MERS cannot act for a “non-functional entity” (which means an entity that has gone out of business and years later, all of a sudden uses MERS (through the actions of the servicer’s own employees or another third party) to cover up the chain of title and bring the note and mortgage or deed of trust from the originating, out-of-business lender, to the present tense, in an attempt to allow whatever party comes in with a claim against the property, to foreclose on it.  Apparently, this same testimony allegedly worked on  a case in New Mexico as well, allegedly.  I use the word “allegedly” here because there’s no attached “oral transcript” or “order” from either court to validate the claims made by attorney Jeff Barnes, who goes into court pro hac vice (a guest of the court, using the resident attorney’s bar license) to help the homeowner (who is paying major dollars to both Barnes and the resident lawyer) get out of their foreclosure jam.

I find it odd that a post, dated October 29, 2018, on Barnes’s website, would make such statements without completing the grandstanding against MERS by actually including “hard evidence” in the form of a transcript or order, don’t you think?  In the New Mexico case, it wasn’t a slam dunk, however, it appears, without verification, that most of the borrower’s affirmative defenses would be sustained based on this new admission of MERSCORP’s own lawyer.  If one wanted to really make themselves appear “credible” with their “victory lap”, don’t you think one should brandish the sword they used as the weapon of choice?  (I put this in here for you Game Of Thrones fans!)  But, seriously, wouldn’t that make logical sense?   So we could read HOW the defeat occurred?

But wait, that would make the grandstanding (to get more business obviously) more plausible and less arrogant, right?  We can’t have THAT now, can we?  We need to further our business model and leave borrowers in the dark, only to surmise that somewhere out there, a MERSCORP attorney was indeed deposed and testified that his client has no right to transfer the note (something I’ve been saying for years) because MERS has no interest in it.  Factually, even if such an order or transcript WERE included, do you really think most borrowers would know HOW to take what they’ve learned from it and apply it to their own scenario?  Not hardly.  Not in today’s court systems.

It should be noted that the claim was made (in Barnes’s website post) that a deposition was taken, which means the only way you’re going to get damning information to shut down the banks’ arrogance, it to get damning information by conducting a deposition.  This is where the rubber meets the road with foreclosure defense attorneys because great discovery wins cases and if your attorney is “lacking” when it comes to getting the right set of facts out of a deposition, you’ve lost not only your home but all those financial resources you could have used to move onto PLAN B. Pro se litigants rarely, if ever, conduct a deposition, let alone a proper and complete one.

In sum, you’re either going to fight the bank’s arrogance with provable facts or you’re not.  The system of things supports more than just an affirmative defense against the bank’s lawyer because of the misrepresentations in his pleadings.  It supports a bar complaint.  I don’t see too many foreclosure defense lawyers putting forward bar complaints based on false and misrepresentative pleadings from foreclosure mill attorneys, do you?  (This is why we focus more these days on “the system of things” and how that plays out!) 

And somehow, the good ‘ol boy network seemingly continues to survive.

NOTE: If you want to hear multiple scenarios explained about why our voting system may be all f**ked up (especially in Florida with the recent negative spotlight put on it), listen to Dave Krieger tonight (6 p.m. EST) on WKDW-FM’s City Spotlight – Special Edition, just by clicking on this link and then clicking on LISTEN NOW!  Joining Dave and co-host R.J. Malloy as their guests are North Port, Florida City Commissioner Jill Luke and outgoing City Commissioner Linda Yates.

4 Comments

Filed under OP-ED

UPDATE: PRO-BANK 5TH U.S. CIRCUIT APPELATES TAKE DOWN ANOTHER HOMEOWNER … MAYBE?

(BREAKING NEWS — OP-ED) —  The author of this post is a paralegal and consultant to attorneys in foreclosure matters and issues involving “the system of things”.  None of what you’re reading in this post should be construed as legal advice nor posited to guarantee a legal outcome.  

UPDATE: Now that the legal community has had somewhat of a chance to review the previously discussed Fifth U.S. Circuit ruling (in THIS case), let’s see what one law firm has to say:  5th Circuit Holds Bankruptcy Stay Tolls Statute of Limitations | Weiner Brodsky Kider PC – JDSupra

This will certainly give you an idea of how the other side thinks.

_______________________________________________________

As promised, I bring you the latest relevant case from the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the Big Easy.  But wait … it wasn’t a “big easy” for the borrower, whose case I worked on long ago (in doing a chain of title assessment for) and whose assignments of deed of trust I use in my chain of title workshops to show “document manufacturing gone wrong”.  Wilshire Credit Corporation, used by Countrywide as one of its servicers,  is to blame for that screw-up.

None of what you’re about to read in this ruling appears proper because no one ever attacked the assignments head on, even when it was suggested to do so. Remember, I can’t give legal advice and it’s sad when I have to read rulings like this, knowing what I know that should have been done, but wasn’t.

So … let’s read the ruling first, then we’ll analyze how the homeowner shot himself in the foot because he put his money where it shouldn’t have been put and didn’t put his money where it should have been put:

HSBC Bank USA NA v Crum, 5th App Cir No 17-11206 (Oct 17, 2018)

We’ll do a little analysis on the chain of title and show you what suspect document manufacturing looks like and my perspective on HOW it should have been challenged.  Is it because of attorney ignorance or just plain and simple frustration?

Let’s see how sharp you are in detecting WHAT went wrong here:

ASSIGNMENT NUMBER ONE                                                                                              

NOTE: Click on the assignment to see it in larger print and click the BACK tab on your computer screen to get back to the article.

I put this assignment FIRST for a reason … look at the time (in the upper, right-hand corner) as to WHEN the assignment was recorded … 11:04:32 a.m. on July 14, 2009.   I surmise that this document was manufactured by employees of the servicer, Wilshire Credit Corporation, to create standing for HSBC Bank USA NA as Trustee for MLMI (that’s Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors) Trust Series 2005-WMC1.  It should be clear to you that “WMC” in the REMIC series was a REMIC set up by WMC Mortgage Corporation, which was the alleged original lender.

The 5th Circuit has already ruled that it doesn’t matter if the original lender went bust BEFORE the documents were created.  How could they do that?   Corruption?  Maybe?   Maybe it was given the wrong information in the pleading.  Maybe?   The appellate court can only rule on the information it was provided and I don’t believe that any of this stuff I’m showing you here was properly vetted in discovery, was it?

Notice something else?   The signer executing this document (a known robosigner), claims to be an “Attorney-in-Fact” for MLMI Lending, Inc., however; as I will show you, she’s not acting as an attorney in fact for WMC Mortgage Corporation, is she?   There’s no written evidence of where the Limited Power of Attorney is recorded on this document, is there?

Also notice that Wilshire Credit Corporation (the mortgage loan servicer) prepared this document and after it was recorded, got it back through the U.S. Mail. This will be important to note for future discussion.

This recording was a 3-page document.  Page 2 contained the legal description.  Now … wait until you see Page 3!

What’s wrong with this picture?  These F**KTARDS can’t even do their job right, can they?   The executor of this document prepared this Allonge to show that the Depositor conveyed it into the REMIC on July 6, 2009.  If you look at the Trust’s 424(b)(5) Prospectus (shown below), the Cut-Off Date for assigning the note and mortgage to the REMIC was January 1, 2005, because (according to the IRS’s Start-up Date for the REMIC) the Closing Date of the REMIC was January 27, 2005.  This Allonge was done over 4-1/2 years later … in violation of the REMIC’s own regulations!  Besides, what do $10/hour employees of Wilshire Credit Corporation know anyway, right?   Who investigated this?  I did!  I told the Borrower long ago what happened to his chain of title.  His attorney apparently didn’t care enough to depose anyone.

Here’s what wrong with this picture:

First, you attach an “Allonge” to the promissory note, NOT an assignment!

Second, the executor of the document, a robosigner-employee of the servicer, claiming to be an attorney-in-fact for MLMI Lending, Inc., not WMC Mortgage Corporation, executed this Allonge less than a WEEK PRIOR TO the actual recording of this assignment!   How convenient is that, considering she is NOT the Lender.

Third, WMC Mortgage Corporation, owned by GE, was closed in 2007 due to the subprime mortgage collapse.  So here we have a servicer’s employee, two years later, claiming she has “attorney-in-fact” status, when most powers of attorney expire when the company GRANTING the LPOA ceases to do business!  It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure this out!  AND …

Fourth, the signer of this document and Allonge is claiming she has power of attorney for MLMI Lending, Inc., right?  Would you please look at the above list of Principal Parties and tell me you see MLMI Lending Inc. anywhere in that document as a listed party to the equation?   So where is Treva Moreland’s authority as a $10/hour mortgage loan servicer’s employee attorney-in-fact status for a lender that closed up shop years earlier?  Oh, wait, the Pro-Bank 5th Circuit doesn’t give a shit, do they?   Or was it the Borrower or the Borrower’s attorney’s fault for not checking into this further?

But wait … it gets better!  (That’s an Al West sarcastic remark!) 

ASSIGNMENT NUMBER TWO

I put this assignment SECOND for a reason … look at the time (in the upper, right-hand corner) as to WHEN the assignment was recorded … 11:13:08 a.m. on July 14, 2009. This document was recorded SEVEN MINUTES AFTER THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT!  Again, I surmise that this document was manufactured by F**KTARD employees of the servicer, Wilshire Credit Corporation, to create standing for HSBC Bank USA NA as Trustee for MLMI (that’s Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors) Trust Series 2005-WMC1.  Notice the same Oregon notary (Justin M. Burns) appears on this assignment as well, claiming that on July 6, 2009, the same day as Treva Moreland, the signer of the first-recorded assignment claims to have attorney-in-fact status …

Here comes Melissa Tomlin (another $10/hour Wilshire Credit Corporation F**KTARD employee), claiming she’s an Assistant Secretary for “MERS” as Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. for then-defunct WMC Mortgage Corporation … AND … she’s assigning BOTH the Note and Mortgage to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. from WMC Mortgage Corporation who (now-defunct) is a “valid Assistant Secretary” for MERS … WOW!  MERS’s resolutions must really be legally sound to be able to have servicer’s employees creating shit documents out of thin air using MERS as a nominee for a closed company … Hmmm … I wonder what agency relationship existed between MERS and WMC after GE closed WMC over two years earlier?

This assignment was also 3 pages in length and was prepared and mailed back to Wilshire Credit Corporation after it was recorded.  Page 2, like before, contains the legal description of the subject property.   And now … for the GRAND FINALE … let’s see what’s on Page 3, shall we? (I am chuckling at this juncture, see if you can figure out why):


Notice what’s on the last page?   AN INDORSEMENT STAMP to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. by WMC Mortgage Corporation!   Again, I surmise the following:

First, endorsements belong on either the promissory note or the allonge to note (if the promissory note is full of endorsements and cannot accommodate any more of them) … NOT ON A RECORDED ASSIGNMENT!

Second, the executor of the document, a robosigner-employee of the servicer, claiming to be an Assistant Secretary for MERS as nominee for then-defunct WMC Mortgage Corporation, HAD KNOWLEDGE OF what she signed when she affixed her signature to the document (that the indorsement stamp was affixed to page 3 therein), or should have had knowledge of it, right?

Third, you’d think she’d have every opportunity, being an Officer of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (Assistant Secretary), by alleged resolution ONLY and not attorney-in-fact, that she’d have some smarts about stuff like this. Nope! Doesn’t appear that way, does it?  In fact, I’m not even sure that Melissa Tomlin (after doing several signature comparisons on assignments from around the country) actually was the party executing this document!

Fourth, remember, WMC Mortgage Corporation, owned by GE, was closed in 2007 due to the subprime mortgage collapse.  So here we have a servicer’s employee, two years later, claiming she has an agency relationship with MERS as an Assistant Secretary, when in fact she’s a Wilshire Credit Corporation employee (clearly, a misrepresentation of fact), when the company GRANTING the nominee status to MERS to create an alleged (unproven) agency relationship in the first place, is no longer business!

Fifth, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that when a company goes bust, agency relationships can be challenged!  I don’t ever see that happening in this case, do you?  (If you do, please correct me in the comments section of this post so everyone can see how uninformed I am!)

But wait … it gets better!  (That’s another Al West sarcastic remark!) 

No one knows how this happened … BUT … either the documents were improperly submitted wrong by Wilshire Credit Corporation when they mailed the packet to the Dallas County Clerk’s Office for recording in his Official Real Property Records … OR … the Clerk’s office juxtaposed the documents … SO … here’s what happened (you may have already figured this out … this is a fun example of a brain teaser for you researchers out there) to screw up the borrower’s chain of title with suspect documents (fact check these if you will):

(1) At the time BOTH assignments were executed, WMC Mortgage Corporation was no longer in business (not that the 5th U.S. Circuit really cares).

(2) MERS was used to cover up the chain of title, even though the agency relationship more than likely ended when WMC closed up shop (there was never a repudiation agreement against the MERSCORP executory contract ever filed in WMC’s bankruptcy, if it fact, it filed for such).

(3) In order for the facts to present themselves in proper order, the second assignment SHOULD HAVE BEEN recorded FIRST to reflect the transfer of the Note and Mortgage to MLMI Lending, Inc. from WMC, so MLMI Lending, Inc. could properly convey it into the REMIC Trust.

(4) But wait!  MLMI Lending, Inc. is nowhere to be found in the Prospectus for the REMIC under “Principal Parties”.  The originating lender was subprime mortgage lender WMC Mortgage Corporation.  True sale #1 would have been from WMC to the Seller, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc., an entirely separate corporation from Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Lending, Inc., right?  So True Sale #1 was F**KED UP!

(5) True Sale #2 should have been from Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., the Depositor for the trust, who, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement found in the Prospectus, signed under penalty of perjury under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, would have and should have completed True Sale #3 by transferring it into the REMIC itself, as the Issuer of the Certificates!

(6) All true sales had to be completed before the Cut-Off Date … so in fact we have a violation of the trust agreement and a misrepresentation in the Prospectus, if we are to believe what just happened here was factual.

(7) The misrepresentations contained within the Assignments themselves purport to have transferred everything (in order) from WMC to MLMI Lending, Inc. and from MLMI Lending, Inc. to the REMIC Trust; however, with them being recorded in reverse, it would have been impossible to represent this the other way around, so the entire chain of custody of the note is convoluted and so is the chain of title, creating suspect issues for discovery.

(8) Because MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) cannot convey Notes because it doesn’t have an interest in the Notes (it only allows lenders to record them in the MERS® System database), then the entire claimed transfer by the servicer’s employee (and NOT the lender itself, who was by then defunct) was also misrepresentative in fact.

(9) Further, all of these misrepresentations appear to constitute violations of the Texas Penal Code and the fact the U.S. Mails were used could constitute felony mail fraud (two counts), which is a 95% slam dunk for the prosecution.  Thus, had “the system of things” played itself out the way it should have been played out, Treva Moreland, Melissa Tomlin and Justin Burns would all be doing time instead of going about their feeble lives doing whatever.

(10) Under “the system of things”, the attorneys for the bank relied on these assignments to steal Mr. Crum’s property and should be disbarred.  The judge in the state court could obviously NOT be held accountable for the fraud on his court, because he wasn’t made aware of it at the time the suit was filed and answered (the Texas Constitution requires all HELOC’s to be judicial challenges under Rule 736 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure).  If the judge was made aware, he could have lost his bond and have been removed from the bench and the headlines would have grabbed national attention!

(11) And now … for the piece d’resistance … the lawsuit filed by the alleged REMIC, for which it got a judgment against Mr. Crum, conveniently alleged that Mr. Crum was in default, when in fact, the REMIC’s own Prospectus required Wilshire Credit Corporation to make Mr. Crum’s payments on the home if he couldn’t make them … see here, see here:

Notice where is says (in Paragraph 2 of the foregoing paragraphs) that the Servicer (Wilshire) is obligated to make such advances with respect to delinquent payments of principal and interest on each Mortgage loan … how then, could Mr. Crum be in default?   If MLMI 2005-WMC1 was never aware of the default, which we know probably didn’t happen since the servicer was making all of the advance payments, then WHO actually was foreclosing on Mr. Crum?

(12) Wilshire Credit Corporation … using what I claim are false and misrepresentative documents!  But I’m not the expert witness here (but I have an attorney who is though).  I still see a mess in the constructive notice to the world of when the documents were juxtaposed.  Improperly recorded documents put the cart before the horse, didn’t they?  Can you see it spelled out now?

Any decent, well-informed, non-agenda’d judge should have been aware of all of this … but then again, they only review what’s put in front of them and what’s challenged and why.   You be the judge as to WHO failed WHO here and why.

I had all the facts in 2011.  Now they’ve come home to roost over seven years later … in a bad way!  I can definitely say discovery was sorely lacking here!

Join Dave Krieger and R. J. Malloy for another exciting segment of City Spotlight – Special Edition on WKDW-FM, 97.5 in North Port, Florida, this Friday night at 6:00 p.m. (Eastern) … the subject matter this week … blockchain, jurisdictional issues, societal breakdown and the latest from the ABA blogs!  To listen to the show, CLICK HERE!

 

 

 

 

 

11 Comments

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED, Securitization Issues