Tag Archives: assignment of mortgage

Foreclosure and your civil rights: A judge rules against you in spite of questionable land record documents … what to do next? (PART I)

(OP-ED) — This overview of cases involving civil rights abuses are the author’s opinions based on his legal research and are for educational purposes only and should not constitute any rendering of legal advice or seek to draw any conclusions of law. The first five points are discussed below:

The time at which a § 1983 claim accrues “is a question of federal law,” “conforming in general to common-law tort principles,” and is presumptively–but not always–“when the plaintiff has ‘a complete and present cause of action.'” Wallace v. Kato, 549 U.S. 384, 388 (2007); Manuel v. Joliet, U.S. Sup. Ct. No. 14-9496 (2017).

— As cited in McDonough v. Smith, U.S. Sup. Ct. No. 18-485 (2019)

This post is circumspect as to the discussion of the items postulated within the land record audit and forensics investigation conducted by the author and his team of researchers in Williamson County, Texas (2012-2013) and Osceola County, Florida (2013-2014), respectively. Anyone who has read through these 179-page and 758-page reports will realize that they are just that … the means to call out an injustice that should have come to light, but never did, during the period following the 2008 financial collapse. Over 10-million homes were taken through both judicial and non-judicial means … and this case, coupled with several others discussed in this post, culminate into what the author has determined is a potentially valid 42 USC § 1983 civil rights claim, which must be filed in federal court in a timely manner.

FALSE AND MISREPRESENTATIVE STATEMENTS

As both of the foregoing reports concluded, documents numbering into the tens of thousands poured into the land records of all 3,041 counties and boroughs across America, each containing false and misrepresentative statements that predicated the actions taken by the banks’ servicers. These documents were generally created under the orders of the servicers themselves and were generally executed by the servicers’ employees, posing as Assistant Secretaries, Vice Presidents or other “loan documentation” employees of the servicer, posing as representatives of the alleged Lenders “in an official capacity”, when in fact, many of these signers were $10/hour paid flunkies who sat around in cubicles and signing rooms, affixing their signatures and notarial seals by the hundreds … per hour, without reading or knowing of the contents contained within the documents as to their validity!

Better than 99% of these documents continue to litter these same land records to this very day and only about .001% of Americans are the wiser.

POINT #1: When the alleged civil rights infraction has occurred

In the McDonough v. Smith case, which was based on a New York State criminal action, the action came to rest in the hands of the United States Supreme Court, which decided on June 20, 2019, in a very narrow opinion, that the action taken by elected official McDonough against prosecutor Smith was untimely. The allegations were based on the alleged manufacture of evidence against McDonough by Smith, not once, but twice. Due to this prosecution (by Smith), McDonough was deprived of his liberty (put in jail) due to this allegedly manufactured evidence. From the foregoing statement that is highlighted in bold-faced type, you can clearly ascertain WHEN you get to file a civil rights-based lawsuit … AFTER your foreclosure has been completed against you and you’ve lost your property at sale.

POINT #2: It is assumed that you are taking notice of the offenders

In order to make this case in point, the author is relying on the assumption that anyone reading the audit and forensic examination will come to realize that not all is copacetic in assignment-land. It is the assignment of the mortgage or deed of trust that is posited here as “manufactured evidence”, to be relied upon for a “conviction”, even though the intended venue is the civil realm and not the criminal. However, the alleged criminal activity involving the manufacture of the documents, which generally appear years after the alleged transfer of notes into REMIC trusts or some other junk debt pool, which says it’s a trust but in reality is nothing more than a third-party debt buyer deceiving both the land recorders and the civil judges alike, is at stake here due to the reliance of its validity.

It is further assumed that every party involved with or “touching” that assignment from its inception to its recorded form and relying upon it thereafter in the taking of your home, knowing the statements contained within said assignment were false and misrepresentative, is McDonough in the civil realm. The documents predated a civil prosecution (foreclosure) and were manufactured as part of a suspected criminal act.

To make it more plain and simple, YOU, the homeowner, did not deceive the land record, the servicers’ employees did. Maybe the law firm acting on behalf of the servicer did by furthering the lie. Maybe the judge knew or should have known that the documents in the case in chief contained questionable statements; however, chose to ignore them for the sake of convenience in clearing off a packed court docket without giving the homeowner (or his attorney) a chance to prove that the prosecution’s case was based on false evidence.

POINT #3: The aspects of perjury and the subornation thereof

18 USC § 1621 (in pertinent part): “Whoever–having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contract to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true … is guilty of perjury and shall … be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”

18 USC § 1622 (in pertinent part): “a person convicted of subornation of perjury may be fined $2,000 and sentenced to up to five years in prison.”

Under the latter, there are five elements which must be proven: (1) that the defendant make an agreement with the person to testify falsely; (2) that the perjury was in fact committed by the offender; (3) the false statements of the perjurer were material to the outcome of the case; (4) that the statements were made knowing of their falsity; and (5) there must be proof that the procurer had knowledge that the perjurer’s statements were false.

This is one of the key issues presenting itself as to the “further than arm’s length transactions” involved in foreclosure so as to create plausible deniability on the part of the perpetrators. Much of this can be ferreted out in depositions, which California attorney Al West has seen first hand.

POINT #4: The recorded alleged false statements in the land record

From the fact patterns discussed in the two foregoing reports, which are shown here for your review (if you so choose) …

… it became obvious to the author (in compiling the data shown in each of the reports) that a fact pattern involving timely suspect behavior occurred at about the time of the prosecution of the foreclosure, despite the fact the alleged information contained within the assignments that showed up in the land records just prior to (or in some cases AFTER the foreclosure action was started) the foreclosure case had indeed occurred.

It should also be noted here that these reports were not indictments, but merely “call outs” to alleged misbehavior on the part of third-party document mills or deceitful acts authorized or carried out by the mortgage loan servicers themselves. In March of 2012, the servicers collectively told the states and the federal government they wouldn’t create suspect documents and record them in the land records anymore, but as history shows (as demonstrated by the audit and forensic examination), no sooner was the ink dry on that agreement, it was back to business as usual.

Thus, the chains of title have been presumedly corrupted by this behavior, which of late, has gotten more sinister in nature, covered up by recorded powers of attorney that appear to grant some sort of authority to misbehave in the drafting of such documents, with no one the wiser.

POINT #5: The statements made within the foreclosure process itself

The next set of documents that appear suspect in the prosecution of the actual foreclosure itself are shown to be that of the “affidavits” or “declarations” made by the servicer’s employee, attached in similar form to both judicial and non-judicial actions. The difference here is that the non-judicial action contains a recorded statement known similarly as “Notice of Default and Election to Sell” and “Notice of Trustee’s Sale”. In both instances, these recorded notices contain the alleged suspect statements, predicated by the suspect assignment, then followed by the alleged “Appointment of Substitute Trustee”, which is not “neutral” by any means.

The judicial aspect involves the filing of a foreclosure complaint and the sworn declaration that accompanies the complaint filing, assumedly from the lender’s representative, when in fact, it’s the servicer’s employee making the statements. These statements then find their way into the initial court case filing.

The second “whammy” is when the servicer’s employee, who has been assumedly “coached” as to how to testify, many times in mock trials at the servicer’s headquarters so that their testimony is groomed to become so believable that the homeowner’s attorney swears the employee is telling the truth, that this is where the suspect “open court subornation of perjury” indeed occurs because: (1) the person testifying has been educated by the servicer to become a professional liar; and (2) the person testifying is relying on the suspect manufactured documents created by others and recorded in the land records of the county the subject property is located in.

HOMEOWNERS CAUGHT UNAWARES

As history has shown us, when the foreclosure debacle first started to litter the courts with cases, 97% of the noticed homeowners “cut and ran” without even entertaining the options. Their “Come to Jesus” meetings were based on fear of a bad result, predicated by a string of unfortunate events, which forced them to simply pack up and flee. The banks and their servicers were counting on this … and they succeeded admirably.

The other 3% of homeowners attempted to retain unlearned attorneys, who were naive as to the trickery committed not only in the land records, but through the MERS® System of things and the illicit behavior of the foreclosure mills … and bad case law affecting homeowners. It took awhile for these defense attorneys to come to grips with what was actually going on … and by then, even the judges were led to believe that what they were doing was above board, when in fact, it was based on manufactured evidence that should have been brought to light beforehand.

And this is why the author and California Attorney Al West created:

The C & E on Steroids!

… because these declaratory relief actions should predicate the foreclosure action, not only creating delays, but to serve as a warning to those who would involve themselves in the chain of deceit involving the taking of a person’s property.

Sadly, 99.9% of all homeowners fail to understand this strategy, which could force a court to quiet title to any given piece of affected property and potentially cause a criminal action to be pursued against those committing perjury and suborning perjury in their sworn statements of record.

What most foreclosure victims also don’t understand is that the application of a civil rights action is also predicated on the denial of declaratory relief, which is the basis for the Cancellation & Expungement (C & E) Action.

Everything that the author has discussed in PART I is the “set-up” to what liability could be ascertained throughout the foreclosure case itself, which a person with some skill and knowledge could do the research on to identify the most likely culpable targets therein.

IN PART II the author will discuss the pertinent parts of various cases in which the courts have identified these misrepresentations and what part of “all is not lost” applies to you, even if you lose on appeal. Yes, there are administrative remedies which have to be exhausted if one is going to go after an attorney, a judge and/or the county that pays them … and how the counties insure themselves against liability … out of a self-insured risk pool.

IN PART III … the author will discuss the attack strategy in the realm of 42 USC § 1983 and 42 USC § 1985, focusing not just on the perpetrators of the phony documents, but also at the attorneys involved in the prosecution of the foreclosures and the judges and the counties that employ them when the judges make bad decisions (like Al West says the judges say to him when approached about the documents, “What else ya got?”), which could make them accomplices to perjury and the subornation thereof.

Leave a comment

Filed under OP-ED, Securitization Issues

Letting the banks “get away with it” …

(BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED) — Part of what we’ll be discussing in the upcoming Foreclosure Defense 101 Workshop on Saturday, October 24th between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. (EDT) is affidavits … in general … and specifically regarding lost notes and assignments.

To further this discussion, I did some heavy research after seeing a Law.com post about a Pennsylvania “lost note affidavit” case and upon review, found what I was looking for … and the results were shocking!

On Page 2 of this 12-page opinion, the borrower (Rao) mortgaged the property and gave MERS nominee status on behalf of SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. That was in early 2006. Notice the following sentence … “On or around April 22, 2013, SunTrust discovered the note was missing from their vault and David Aken, Vice President, executed a Lost Note Affidavit.” Two years later MERS, assigned the mortgage to MB Financial.

Without looking at the assignment, I’ll bet you the servicer’s employees drafted and executed that assignment and it all followed Rao’s alleged “default” on his mortgage (March 1, 2011). That means it took SunTrust two years (April 22, 2013) to discover it didn’t have a “note” in its vault. Could it be that the note was shredded after it was uploaded into the MERS® System? At the bottom of page 2, MB Financial claimed it was in possession, either “directly or through an agent” of a “Lost Note Affidavit”, maintaining it had the right to foreclose on the mortgage.

Now we go to court … MB Financial’s attorney brought in a witness from SunTrust’s “default” department, attesting to the fact that a “Lost Note Affidavit” existed with a “copy” of the note, which contained no endorsement page. Gee, the author wonders how they got a “copy” of the Note if it was lost … Hmmm. Did anyone bother to ask why that was so? How can you negotiate a “note” if only a “copy” exists?

The bank also submitted a certified copy of the Assignment of Mortgage, assumedly drafted and executed by SunTrust to MB Financial. The trial court sustained Mr. Rao’s objection to the Lost Note Affidavit based on hearsay and refused to allow it into evidence, in addition to the admission of the Limited Power of Attorney.

The confusion begins where Mr. Rao (assumedly through his attorney) first made an oral motion for a Nonsuit and discussing with the judge the difference between a Nonsuit and a Directed Verdict, which the Court then entered on behalf of the homeowner. The Directed Verdict was later changed to a Nonsuit in favor of the homeowner after the bank filed a Post-Trial Motion. The next paragraphs … read them carefully because they contain the “nuggets”, in which the objections were sustained in favor of the homeowner.

Understand that was this entire matter was over was the differences between a nonsuit and a directed verdict and what the evidence could otherwise prove or show. Because the Trial Court precluded the Lost Note Affidavit from evidence, MB Financial couldn’t prove “possession” of the Note. But could it “prove” its case anyway if it only had a “copy”?

This is where it helps to know local court rules (or at best, state rules).

What you’re seeing in this case is the roundabout, typical argument that banks always use in getting their lost notes “re-established” to make them “stick” as evidence at trial. Why then, did it take SunTrust so long to discover it had no note? Was it because it wasn’t until after 2011 that Rao didn’t pay his mortgage loan and someone went looking for the documentation? Why did it take so long to discover the original note wasn’t part of the collateral loan file? The Superior Court ruled that as long as the witness can “provide sufficient information relating to the preparation and maintenance of the records” to justify their trustworthiness, they should be allowed into evidence as business records.

However, there is no mention of proof of the default. Since MERS was involved, the note had to have been securitized into a REMIC trust, which was commonplace during that time. The author sees no evidence of any default argument here, but rather, a business records exception argument.

Also notice that the Court declined to analyze whether the contents of the Lost Note Affidavit complied with the statutory “sufficiency requirements” and reversed and remanded the case for a new trial. That means MB Financial “gets another bite at the apple”.

And this is why we’re going to cover the affidavits per se in our upcoming workshop. The basis for creating an affidavit is personal knowledge and how and when “things” got lost, stolen, misplaced … or even created in the first place!

You can sign up for the workshop on the Clouded Titles website!

The author of this post is not an attorney and offers this constructive analysis for educational purposes only.

Leave a comment

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED

PREPARING FOR THE FORECLOSURE ONSLAUGHT

(OP-ED) — The author of this post is a paralegal and trial consultant on quiet title, foreclosure and document challenges and does not offer the following information for anything but educational “intake” value; thus, none of this should be regarded as legal advice nor relied upon without the advice of competent counsel.  

THE TIME TO PREPARE IS NOW!

Understand that my postulations on this blog serve as warning signals for “how to head ’em off at the pass” and my notions are served by supporting case law.

I consider Rhode Island to be a hopeless case when it comes to MERS-related cases.  Anytime you want to argue what rights MERS has to do anything in front of a Rhode Island Superior Court judge, you may as well just turn around, bend over and let him … (insert your own imaginative deviations here).

However, on occasion, a case will come up where judges’ deviant behavior is called out by their state’s Supreme Court and I make note of the following case as it relates to other matters you should be looking out for at the inception of the alleged “bank” behavior in its attempt to start a foreclosure action:

Woel v Christiana Trust et al, Sup Ct R. I. No. 2018-347 (June 2, 2020)

The very basic tenets of a foreclosure involve “notice” and what constitutes proper notice.  Many things come into play in this 16-page opinion; however, despite the rantings of the mortgage loan servicer in this opinion (Selene Finance), the state’s highest court vacated the Superior Court judge’s for summary judgment in favor of the alleged REMIC.

Preparation for the onslaught by your alleged “note holder” involves some deliberate planning:

  1. Get out all of your mortgage documents and read them, especially the part where the default and any related notices to you come into play.  If notice does not comport to the terms of your mortgage or deed of trust, your focal point becomes attacking THAT flaw, not everything else.  The foregoing case illustrates that.
  2. Obtain copies of all recorded documents NOW!  You get them from your county land records. Do not wait until you start getting notices from your mortgage loan servicer and go into a state of panic or denial and hit the “pause” button.  Because of this COVID-19  pandemic, you have the ideal opportunity to get proactive to deal with what may be coming at you head-on when the moratoriums are lifted and the servicers go on the warpath.
  3. Locate any/all Assignments of Mortgage or Deed of Trust.  These become your secondary form of attack.  You will need to analyze them fully and understand what constitutes the basis for your attack.  Come at them in the wrong way and your attack plans will fail. Examining these assignments requires due diligence and intensive research.  Plan on spending an entire day looking up everyone that is named within those assignments and background them thoroughly.
  4. Develop a timeline of your chain of title.  You have to be able to clearly identify WHAT happened during the course of ownership of your home and identify with specificity WHEN it happened and attempt to detail the reasons for such occurrences.  Knowing HOW an entity operates in order to develop suspect patterns is important in your research, so don’t skimp here, on time or details.
  5. Obtain certified copies of all recored assignments as well as “office copies” of all recorded documents.  You want a certified copy of the assignment as evidence in support of your two-pronged secondary attack.  What I will be sharing in the upcoming online Foreclosure Defense 101 Workshop will deal with this step in the process.  Keep in mind that you may have experience in dealing with previous foreclosure attempts.  Many of the defenses may have resulted in successes in your favor; however, also keep in mind that the servicers’ lawyers are going to ramp up the next time and probably won’t make the same mistake again.
  6. Open all mail and especially those certified letters and notices from your alleged “note holder” or servicer.  DO NOT let them pile up on the desk or kitchen counter. Be excited when they arrive.  Be excited when the process server comes to your door.  DO NOT avoid service.  If you do, the bank’s lawyers (who are really representing the servicers) will serve you with Substituted Service and/or when that attempt fails, you get hit with a default judgment, which is as good as gold to the bank!  (This of course, does not apply to deed of trust states!)
  7. Examine any notices you receive regarding the “alleged default” on your loan. Understand WHO the letter is coming from and WHO is attempting to accelerate the note, which requires payment in full in lieu of pursuit of a foreclosure action against your property.  The letter should fully explain WHO is claiming to be the “note holder” that has the right to enforce the terms of the mortgage or deed of trust.  If that portion is missing from the notice, you have every right to immediately demand an explanation vis a vis a Qualified Written Request under Section 6 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA).  You cannot prepare an adequate defense if you don’t know who’s coming after you.
  8. In all instances, assume that: (a.) any notices you get from a trustee or law firm are based on actions by the mortgage loan servicer, NOT the lender or trustee of a REMIC trust; (b.) any notices you get will likely contain false and misrepresentative statements; and (c.) any notices you get will rely on a corresponding assignment that has been recorded in the land records preceding a Substitution of Trustee or Notice of Default or Notice of Intent to Foreclose.
  9. At all times during the process, keep your eye on the land records!  Check them weekly for any sign of new recordings, corrections to the assignments or newer recordings, attempts to hide the assignments by using alternative means (like putting all of the recorded documents in the name of your spouse, etc.). If need be, ask your county clerk for help in determining if there’s “anything else” in the land records you’ve missed that could defeat your defense, including Limited Powers of Attorney recorded by the mortgage loan servicers, especially when they’re the “assignor” and the “assignee” (called a self-assignment) of any alleged authority.
  10. Understand that YOU are NOT the perpetrator of any alleged foreclosure scheme coming against you!  You have every right as a property owner to defend the home to the best of your ability, even if you lack legal acumen.  As a participant, you may also become the victim of identity theft and numerous felonies committed by the bank, the trustee or the mortgage loan servicer dealing with your mortgage loan.  Assume everything they tell you is a lie … and you won’t be surprised later because you’ve prepared yourself to retaliate against their false assumptions.

Mortgage loan servicers are out to make money to reimburse what they had to pay investors or whatever lender happens to allege it’s the “note holder”.

At a point in time in the near future, the moratoriums will be lifted and you should be well prepared to understand whether the servicer coming against you has any right to offer you a loan modification or forbearance … or for that matter … to come against you at all.  I’ll discuss that in my next segment.  Visit the Clouded Titles website for more information!

Leave a comment

Filed under OP-ED, Securitization Issues, webinar, workshop

REMEMBER WHO THE ENEMY IS …

(BREAKING NEWS) — The author of this post is issuing this update to give you a bit more incentive to participate in the upcoming online COTA Workshop.  The information presented here is for educational purposes only; however, it’s based on years of research by this author and through discussions with attorneys who have utilized this material to their benefit. 

For those of you who are being exposed to COTA (an acronym for Chain Of Title Assessment) for the first time, or wish to intensify the study into the COTA for future use in helping others (and making a sideline income from your knowledge you’ve obtained here), let’s briefly delve into what the chain of title is and how the COTA differs from a simple “title report” issued by today’s title companies across America.

(1) Assists in identifying all known potential claimants to property

It doesn’t matter whether you’re buying a home for the first time or putting your faith in a landlord who claims to own the home he’s renting to you, it pays to understand “who’s on title”. In this day and age, more and more issues of fraudulent transfer and assignments of lien have permeated hundreds of thousands of land records, if not by crooks attempting to commit identity theft by recording false deeds, but by the very banks and secondary players “in the game” that created assignments out of thin air and caused them to be placed into the public record, all since the 2008 financial collapse!  Simply looking at the deed to a piece of property isn’t enough. The aftermath that followed the collapse (2009-2015) has been proven by this author and others to have been one giant scheme to steal property across America by some very unscrupulous sponsor-sellers on Wall Street using phony documents to get their way.  If you or this author ever attempted to do what the banks did, we’d be in jail, because the government is in bed with the banks!  The COTA helps you to identify those person(s) who say they have an interest in the property, whether by claim of ownership or by lien interest.

(2) Assists in identifying potential unknown intervening assignees

Many do not recognize the word “mesne”.  It’s pronounced “mine”.  It’s a legal term that means unidentified players within the chain of title and these players became unknown “assignees” through the use of an electronic database called Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (or “MERS”).  If you’ve read Clouded Titles, you know that MERS is currently operating under its third incorporated version, taken over in October of 2018 by the same corporate outfit that owns the New York Stock Exchange, ICE (an acronym for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.). The mesne assignees entered the chain of title to millions of pieces of property through the use of the MERS System®.  This workshop will teach you the fundamentals of how securitization operates and just how the silent invasion of millions of phony documents entered the public recording system. It’s knowledge that has cost over 10-million Americans their homes because they didn’t have that knowledge when they took out their mortgage loans way back when.  If this workshop could save you tens of thousands of dollars in mistakes, wouldn’t that be worth it?

(3) Assists in identifying abuse to the title by lien holders & clients 

It goes without saying that millions of Americans have fallen prey to the scheme of obfuscation within the chain of title by parties that all of a sudden “claimed” an interest in any given piece of property in America simply by creating an assignment of mortgage (or deed of trust) with the intention of giving the recorded instrument legal effect for the purposes of foreclosure.  The banks and the financial industry supporting the use of MERS then proceeded to infiltrate all 3,041 public records through the use of legislation, which more than likely came into being through the use of “monetary incentives” (i.e., “the best congress money can buy”) to get legislation passed to allow a “book entry system” to permeate the land records all across America through the use (and abuse) of documents that were vague and ambiguous, which this author first discussed in the very first COTA Workshop he ever taught, as a CLE to attorneys in Texas. Now you can have access to that same information, which could help you in making what could be life and death decisions!

(4) Assists in identifying potential causes of action for use in litigation

The one thing for certain in America is that these abuses within “the system of things” has made the greater percentage of the citizens in this country litigious in one way, shape or form. The remains of those who have been foreclosed upon in the past have paved the road with bad case law because they (and their attorneys) fought with bad information, information that was passed through the legal forums throughout America by attorneys who became part of a very widespread network of what are known as foreclosure mills.  Some have fallen by the wayside, while others have only gained in strength by setting case law in their favor before most Americans (who were foreclosure victims, and their lawyers) realized what kind of legal charade was being falsely portrayed within the judicial venues throughout this country.  This author is convinced that all of this was by design, to give these foreclosure mills lots of work and as one attorney this author knows put it, “How to steal people’s homes for fun and profit.”  Sadly, 97% of all affected homeowners cut and ran, leaving the system to its own devices.  Those who fought the banks and their servicers found out the hard way that claiming “fraud” costs money … more money than the average American homeowner anticipated spending to stay in their home. There’s a right way and a wrong way to understand “the game” … and you’ll learn that in this workshop!

(5) Establishes proof of ownership in the chain of title (deraignment)

Here’s a term (deraignment) that most people don’t understand the concept of.  In this workshop, the author is going to show you not only what this term means, but how it’s applied in law!

(6) Establishes parameters for given time periods of recordation (laches)

The doctrine of laches kind of works like a ticking clock.  Many Americans have been duped into believing that once they’ve found out that they were “screwed over” by the banks, they attempted to file lawsuits against the banks and MERS, something the banks were geared up in advance to wage a winning war against these unsuspecting homeowners and their attorneys, who soon found out that there were more ways of making money than by doing simple wills and estate planning.  Welcome to the understanding of what makes a foreclosure defense lawyer tick … your paycheck in his trust account!  Laches is further explained in the COTA Workshop … which can be taken via the internet right from your very own home computer.

(7) Establishes proper document recordation value (as to sequence)

It’s not just a recorded document that makes a difference … it’s how all of the documents in the chain of title interrelate to each other.  We’re going to go into detail by showing you case studies within the COTA Workshop so you can gain an understanding of how these abuses within the chain of title occurred and how the COTA is used to formulate litigation.

(8) Establishes proper evidence to identify potential problems with title

If you had a way to identify issues within your chain of title, wouldn’t that make your understanding of future litigation more practical?  This is why so many attorneys across America have read Clouded Titles. In fact, this book (written by the author who is teaching this online COTA Workshop) was recommended to homeowners by U.S. Bankruptcy Court Trustees!  This means that the information contained within this book (and this author’s subsequent teachings) was very quickly picked up by “the system” and integrated into its database of legal knowledge.  As a bonus … for those of you taking the online COTA Workshop … you’re going to receive a complimentary copy of this book that has gotten the attention of even the federal judiciary!  Suing for everything under the sun (including the kitchen sink) is a big waste of time and money.  This online COTA Workshop will teach you the basics of understanding what the aspects of litigation are and how you, as a past, present and future homeowner, can benefit from understanding the fundamental issues within chains of title that have been affected by the schemes perpetrated by the banks and their henchmen.  This goes way beyond what title companies will ever reveal … because the title companies are “in on it”!

(9) Raises potential legal issues based on research of statutory violations

This author has written other publications which explore the universe of legal claims based on violations of statute.  Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to understand how and where to find this information … and the author will show you how in the online COTA Workshop!

(10) Raises potential legal issues based on unproven but evident fraud

Fraud! Fraud! Fraud!  That’s all this author hears homeowners bleat (like sheep to the slaughter).  Learn what the potential legal issues are without becoming a victim of them!  It’s a very expensive proposition … something this author knows could save you tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees just by your gaining an understanding of how you (as a homeowner) have been duped.

(11) Raises awareness of concern by the Preparer as to legal consideration

If you were going to help others (while making a living doing COTAs) avoid these same pitfalls, wouldn’t it be nice to know exactly HOW the author came to understand the fundamental concept of how the chain of title works?  Spending tens of thousands of dollars in litigation costs makes everyone but you (the homeowner) rich.  Why drop that big dime if you can possibly avoid it?  We’ll even be discussing quiet title and the use of declaratory judgment actions as a part of the common strategy to get to the truth of the matter involving chain of title!

(12) Raises the stakes of potential legal claims for damages

Out of these dozen reasons why you should consider taking this online COTA Workshop … if you had a clear and concise understanding of what you were up against and knew the real issues within your chain of title (or could research the chain of title for a prospective property you wish to acquire as a means of building equity), wouldn’t it be nice to know that once you’re all settled in, you’re not going to become a victim of foreclosure by some unscrupulous lender, based on those mesne assignees this author talked about in the beginning of this post?  If you knew which legal claims were more profitable than others, wouldn’t that be a good thing?

The online COTA Workshop begins February 1st (that’s this coming Saturday) … why not start out the New Year with a chunk of knowledge that can not only save you thousands of dollars in legal fees, but also give you the opportunity to make a decent living while helping others avoid the pitfalls that have cost millions of Americans dearly.

Click here to register to attend! 

In addition, if you missed something … after taking the online COTA Workshop … we’ll make these sessions available to you online so you can further your studies and pick up the nuggets you may have missed while attending the online COTA Workshop … all of which you can access FREE OF CHARGE, with your paid attendance to the workshop!

Plus, by attending the online COTA Workshop, you get a complimentary copy of the book Clouded Titles!

The webinar platform will give you a chance to ask questions at the Q&A breaks in the class too!  

Knowledge is power!

The clock is ticking … what are you waiting for?

A summons to appear in court or a notice of default?

Don’t be a victim!

Arm yourself with education!

Click here to register to attend! 

 

2 Comments

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, Securitization Issues, webinar, workshop

THE C&E, ASSIGNMENTS … AND YOUR RIGHT TO CHALLENGE THEM (PART 2) …

(OP-ED) — The author of this post challenges you to seriously think about this process, because it is virtually available to everyone in the United States who has ever had their mortgage loan securitized … even if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the “aunt” and “uncle” the U.S. Government doesn’t like to talk about) are involved … 

Scenario … “The Punch Line”

In part 1 of this blog post, we talked about how homeowners were duped by table-funded mortgage brokers and DBA’s (fictitious entities) who claimed they were New York corporations when in fact, they were “storefronts” for the major lenders who made the “storefronts” the actual borrowers in your loan transactions, potentially rehypothecating those loans over and over again using your personal identifying information to sell pieces of your loans into bundles of pools of loans on Wall Street.

Party A runs “the smoke screen”.

Party B fronts the “investor funds” using non-compliant prospectuses that were signed under Sarbanes-Oxley that don’t matter to them anyway.

Party C plays completely outside of the MERS® System and really has nothing to do but sit back and collect residual income being a go-between prior to your loan allegedly going into a REMIC that’s been empty all along.

Party D plays the Trustee for the REMIC … and just sits back and collects his fees from what the servicer gets and turns a blind eye to your loan default.

Party E (empty promises) is the servicer who is robbing Peter to pay Paul’s debts and this is why entities like Ocwen have to go out and securitize $600-million in new paper just to fund Advances to keep paying the certificate holders of these REMICs so we don’t have another crash (like 2008).

Party F (meaning the ones who actually get f**ked) are the investors that actually bought into this crap.  They have so much money they don’t know what to do with it.  I sometimes don’t feel bad about them getting raped.  They deserve it.

So why is it that when we’re in court the judge ignores your comeback when you attack an assignment of mortgage or deed of trust for containing false and misrepresentative information?   The judge is waiting for the bank’s attorney to allege that you’re not a third-party beneficiary and that you can’t attack the assignment.  Aaahhhh …. but that’s the bigger lie!

You see … the title documents in the land records represent your chain of title.  If your chain of title is jacked up, you couldn’t sell your property if you wanted to in order to mitigate the lender’s losses, even if the lender could prove they’re entitled to the proceeds of the sale of your home.  This has been the bigger problem with challenging foreclosures, because the banks (via a vis their servicers) use the chain of title (through the MERS® System) to lie their way through the courts and the judges play along with it because … well … “we can’t hurt the banks”.

If a chain of title is unmarketable, what reasonable buyer would want to purchase it?

If a chain of title is unmarketable, it violates every state’s law that guarantees marketability of title!

If a chain of title is unmarketable, it’s because it’s vendibility is impaired (you can’t sell it).  No one wants to buy someone else’s problems … especially if the title is slandered (Hello?  …  Can you say “damages’?)

If the chain of title is unmarketable because it’s title is screwed up … title companies won’t insure it.

If it’s uninsurable, no one is going to sell it.  How could they?   If title companies do insure these properties, they’ll exclude coverage for the applicable errors!  You won’t get a dime on a title claim, while the title companies make off with your premium payment at closing!

If you’re in states where only the lien interest is sold (like in California), the banks get to kick the can down the road, and investors are stuck with nothing but screwed-up chains of title and they can’t do anything but rent the properties out because there’s no way to quiet the title without exposing the truth … and no one can afford to expose the truth because American Jurisprudence is tainted.

The reason I bring it up?

The Assignment has your name and your property’s references within it. 

Every state has a set of statutes that allow consumers to challenge the assignments, releases, and any other document in their chain of title that is “suspect” for false and misrepresentative information.   If you let the bank’s attorney get away with stating that you’re not a third-party beneficiary, then you have to ask yourself …

WHAT THE HELL DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH THE BOGUS INFORMATION IN THE LAND RECORDS?

This is why statutes were formulated to combat erroneous (many times deliberate) behavior in the creation of these phony assignments and releases.  The problem is … 99% of the attorneys don’t like doing declaratory judgment actions … half the time because they don’t know how!   This is why Al West and I did a deep dive into the assignments and Al West came up with the notion that cancelling and expunging the phony document would force the court to have to quiet the title. If you’re attacking the property’s title because it violates statute, how then could the lender foreclose?

You can’t break one law to enforce another law! 

This is why Appendix 11 of The C&E on Steroids! has all of those statutes in it!  If the document affects your chain of title, you have an “in” to attack it through declaratory relief.  All American homeowners are entitled to have a property that has marketable title and this is why these remedies were created.  American property owners need to wake up and realize what they’re up against here, because it’s not really that expensive a proposition to attack these assignments.  There’s always quiet title too … which is why we included that in the latest book, which includes an 8-DVD training video kit!

You want your attorney to know the truth?  Share this information with him (or her).  If attorneys knew the simplicity of doing a declaratory relief action, they’d have a whole new way to make a living without stressing themselves out over it. Did you hear that lawyers?   That’s why Al West (who is an attorney that uses the C&E  a lot in his practice) has graciously supplied a ton of exhibits for you to look at and glean from … it’s the best educational tool of the decade.

If there are over 500-million phony assignments and other bogus documents in the land records, why aren’t we doing something about it?

Frankly, if you can understand that when the crash hit and everyone found themselves upside down in their mortgage loans, 95% of them cut and ran … that’s why.  Someone has to carry the ball and pay it forward.  This may be your calling.

I assisted a Florida attorney in doing a C&E in a Release of Mortgage, which convoluted the title even further, designed to create a statutory violation while challenging the lender (3 cans down the road) to prove how the first lender paid off the original loan with refi money.  That too is in the book (pleadings and all)!

 

The training kit is here in limited supply.  I have 33 kits left in stock.  I do not know when we’ll reorder.  If you want to fight the good fight, then force the courts to make your property marketable again.  Until the courts deal with these title issues, you the homeowner are just helping the banks “kick the can down the road” … soon, we’ll end up as a nation of renters for sure, because only investors will own all the homes (at least that’s what they think).  They get stuck with the crappy titles and you get stuck being a renter!

Is that really what you want?

… AND HERE’S AN ADDED BONUS!

The folks who order this DVD training kit will get the new Robert Janes compilation of SHELLGAME MERS, the 2009 RULES and his latest white paper on defeating California foreclosures!  Included absolutely FREE!   

PLUS … I’ll throw in a copy of THE FDCPA, DEBT COLLECTION AND FORECLOSURES work as well … for use in fighting unscrupulous debt collectors.

That’s an extra $80 worth of useful tools to add to your arsenal

This offer will expire June 30, 2019 … so get your C&E training kit NOW!  

CLICK HERE TO ORDER!

Leave a comment

Filed under OP-ED