Tag Archives: deed of trust

A friendly reminder … about “copies”!

I was having a conversation with one of my team into the wee hours last night about these supposed Notes that are filed with courts around the country, claiming to be certified copies and signed off on with some anonymous initials. This is what judges rely on when they grant foreclosure on someone’s home.

How do they get away with it?

Because no one is thinking about the Negotiable Instruments section of the Uniform Commercial Code!

Section 3-501 et seq clearly talks about this. Every state has it in its codes under UCC.

Scenario #1:

You are in a deed of trust state (non-judicial). In order to stop the sale of your home, you have to file a lawsuit. Once you are “noticed”, usually by certified mail and then in the real property records with a Notice of Default and Election to Sell, you have so much time to respond.

This is where the QWR comes in. This is also where the DVL comes in. Pre-litigation discovery!

No servicer (who the two foregoing letters go to) will let you see the original note because they don’t have it. If the loan was securitized, the note and deed of trust were shredded when they were uploaded into the MERS System®, so the best you’ll get is a “copy” of the Note you signed.

So you’re preparing a draft of a lawsuit, asking for an injunction to stay the sale, eh? You’ll have to have some sort of discovery in the works, but wait! Doing this in court is time-consuming and expensive, which is why I like QWR’s and DVL’s. You send them to the servicer’s QWR address (specifically) … don’t send them to the servicer’s regular address (they have an address specifically for QWR’s) unless you want your requests to be ignored. It’s like getting the evidence in advance without discovery.

Scenario #2:

You are in a mortgage state (judicial). You’ve already received a Notice of Intent to Accelerate the Note.

This gives you “x” number of days to respond, because the mortgage loan servicer that is behind the scenes “doing the dirty” has retained the law firm to prosecute the foreclosure. While the QWR and DVL is a great way to slow down the progress of opposing counsel, you need to pay attention to the local court docket.

Once you’ve been served with Notice about being sued, understand that state and local court rules apply. You have “x” number of days in which to respond. Check the land records for the filing of the Notice of Lis Pendens because that’s the document that most attorneys claim just slandered title.

Normally, you check the copy of the summons and complaint to foreclose for the most damning information. You discover the Note attached with a stamp on it that says, “Certified Copy of” or something similar, signed off on with some title company executive’s initials. The first mistake is to ignore it.

The Copy and the UCC

To put it in simple terms … take a check, make it payable to yourself … now make a photocopy of that check (both sides), so the check looks as if it’s been copied (this is what the servicers do). Then take the copy of your check to your local bank and tell the teller you need to cash the check. What do you think the teller would say?

“Sorry, I can’t cash a copy of the check, I have to have the original.” Duh. She might even hit the silent alarm and you’ll be in leg irons in short order for attempting to forge a check. Copies don’t work. That’s part of a UCC term called “presentment”. You either have the original or you don’t. Why don’t attorneys simply explain to a judge this very scenario about taking a copy of a check to a bank and trying to endorse the copy and present it to a teller to cash and then wonder why the cops were called. Hello?

Just a thought.

Don’t you just love the days of technology gone by? The servicers are also very good at creating notes out of thin air too. If you suspect this is happening, you’ll have to cough up the funds to pay a forensic note examiner to look at your note and testify that it is a forgery.

Endorsements

This is another subject that fools a lot of people. Many times, the servicer will come into court through their attorneys and attempt to demonstrate the note has an indorsement-in-blank on it, which turns it into “bearer paper”, meaning that anyone who has the original with this on it can cash it. Did you get that?

You can’t cash copies … no matter what! Endorsements can be forged. Rubber stamps can be ordered to spec. Research into the stamps becomes necessary. Research into WHO put the stamps on the note is also necessary.

THIS CASE COULD NOT HAVE COME AT A BETTER TIME … LIKE NOW!

This is why I put out the Advanced COTA Workshop Kit on the Clouded Titles website. It’s full of research and litigation strategies!

Leave a comment

Filed under I'm not posting any more stuff on here!

Uptick In Foreclosures? Fraudulent Transfers?

(BREAKING NEWS) — The author of this post posits the following information for educational purposes only and any information contained herein should not be construed to be the rendering of legal advice. For legal advice, you should consult with an attorney that has won several foreclosure cases. NOTE: There are a lot of attorneys out there that think they can defeat a foreclosure; however, these people simply see a monthly annuity and have figured out a way to stall the inevitable.

Years ago, when this author wrote Clouded Titles (his second work, which followed The Credit Restoration Primer, now in its 5th edition), now in its Mayday Edition, he set up an alert in his Google system settings to detect any reference to the phrase Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

The reason for this is because back in 2007, while doing research on chains of title in his local land records, he discovered the widespread appearance of this electronic database throughout his local public record and this was the start of a 2-year quest into researching the sum, substance and function of what most in the legal profession refer to as MERS. After filling up 4 file drawers full of printed material from various articles, court cases and public records (including his own public record filings), this author decided that since there were no actual books out there describing the chicanery on Wall Street and how MERS was involved in it all, that the public needed to know the truth … and this is how Clouded Titles was born.

Thanks to the “alerts” set up in the Google search system, this author is able to monitor perceived upticks in the foreclosure markets, based on what is happening throughout the U.S. and the notices posted in various newspapers’ legal sections throughout the country.

What the author of this post has also noticed is that because the economy is stagnating, people are without incomes. As a result, the propensity to commit crimes against property by filing documents that purport to transfer title into the name of the perpetrator so the property could be listed and sold through nefarious means is also on the rise. Once the property is sold, the foreclosure starts. The author has seen evidence of an uptick in this area as well.

This is why it’s a good idea to check up on your public records involving your property every 3 months, just like you would check up on your credit reports to make sure they’re accurately being reported. County Clerks are paid to assist you in looking up your records if you don’t know how to do it. Many of the databases are online, so they are easily traceable via the county’s search engine. When you conduct a search, you need to be especially aware of any “assignments” of not only mortgages (or deeds of trust) that have been recorded in the public record that transfer an interest in any loan taken out against the property or to detect the insidious crime of property theft by fraudulent deed transfer.

If you suspect you’ve been “taken” in such a manner, the first thing you should do is to go to the County Clerk’s (Recorder, Register of Deeds, Auditor, etc.) office and obtain a certified copy of the suspect document. The second thing you should do is to take that suspect document to your county sheriff and file a formal criminal complaint against the party or parties allegedly effectuating the transfer.

Part of the problem with fraudulent transfers and assignments however, is that the goings-on behind the scenes within law enforcement appears well above the pay grade of the detectives working in the crimes against property unit. This was evidenced in the follow-up meeting with Osceola County, Florida detectives in 2015 (along with the County Attorney, who was obviously “in on it” with them), who couldn’t find any evidence of wrongdoing in the Report this author spent five months working on … and instead, chose to “shoot the messenger” instead. The County Attorney then proceeded to inquire who the forensic team members were that gleaned the public record looking for suspect documents. The information was not required to be provided under the Open Records Act laws, thus, the County Attorney came away from the meeting empty-handed. The detectives however, wanted to know who certified all of the 17 banker’s boxes of suspect documents delivered to the States’ Attorney in Florida’s 9th Circuit, who saw the files and the report as a “political hot potato” and wanted nothing to do with them. Law enforcement in Osceola County, Florida then began to harass and surveil a known member of the forensic team who lived in the county and who was an outspoken critic of the illicit foreclosures taking place in his county. A family member of the forensic team’s liaison was tasered and arrested as he was walking onto his front porch at 3:00 a.m. after being out with his cousin, was not drunk and was not disrespectful or disorderly against the arresting deputies (who were surveilling the home). The charges were eventually dropped. This is just one scenario that happens when one “tries to do the right thing”.

This presents us with another known problem with law enforcement: corruption. Unless your county sheriff is a “constitutional sheriff”, don’t expect your complaint or any potential investigation to go anywhere, especially after having researched the campaign donors to your local district attorney in the last election. This author would encourage you to research CSPOA.org and become a member and get the information necessary to further your campaign in either getting the sheriff on board or finding ways to get him/her ousted from public office.

This author also reminds you (at this juncture) that county sheriffs are bonded. Without a bond (due to forfeiture), they can’t hold office as a sheriff. This is why counties have Risk Managers. A Risk Manager is another word for “damage control”. This individual gets more crap thrown at them from both consumers and county officials as a result of their positions. This is why it’s become harder to find competent people willing to undertake the honest task of “doing the right thing” and getting consumers the information on who the agent is for the bond, along with their address, phone # and policy number.

If the county’s risk manager refuses to give you that information, send an Open Records Act Request under state statutes and demand the information. Once obtained, you may wish to consider filing a complaint against the bond of the individual that failed to do their constitutional duty to protect your rights under the law.

NOTE: This procedure can also be used against school boards as well (that treat parents like domestic terrorists for speaking out at school board meetings); however, that’s not the subject matter of this article so this author won’t dwell on that scenario at this time.

In closing, a genuine foreclosure has to be treated differently. This author would encourage the use of a Qualified Written Request (QWR) under RESPA § 6. Do not ask for originals of any documents because it’s highly likely they don’t exist. Ask for copies of the note and mortgage (or deed of trust); ask for all information contained in your collateral file; ask for copies of your escrow statements and pay histories. Space out your requests (don’t ask for all of it at once). Request it in two or three certified letters to the servicer’s specific QWR address. You might be surprised to learn that mortgage loan servicer error was responsible for the initiation of the foreclosure to begin with.

NOTE: A QWR is not discovery. A QWR is what this author would be doing if he found out every time that his mortgage loan had been transferred or sold. A QWR response can be used to custom-tailor litigation against the servicer and its employees. Above all, remember that the public record may contain damning information in the form of assignments that can be used to help custom-tailor a QWR request. QWR requests from subsequent servicers can also reveal missing documents that were never transferred to the new servicer in the collateral loan file.

Dave Krieger is a nationally-syndicated talk show host on The Power Hour, heard Monday-Friday from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 Central Time; on AM and FM stations across the U.S. and on 7.490 mHz on the shortwave band worldwide. He also consults with attorneys and homeowners on foreclosure cases.

Leave a comment

Filed under BREAKING NEWS