“… it is constitutionally impermissible for the legislature to authorize the head of an administrative agency to unilaterally compel the 5.8 million citizens of Wisconsin to stay home, close their businesses, and face imprisonment if they do not comply.”
… it still appears that the bitch got away with it! And even though some judges on the state’s high court wrote dissenting opinions, they were in the minority.
I always thought that any order being issued by the Executive Branch of any government come from its leader. In this case, that would be the Wisconsin Governor. But that wasn’t the case, was it? Yet the dissenters came in and protested because the legislature itself suffered no harm, so why should it be granted status as a standing Plaintiff? But wait! Aren’t the members of the Wisconsin Legislature also human beings, susceptible as anyone else of getting COVID-19? And here I thought that “we the people” elected these legislators to do our bidding and do what is right by the will of the people who put them there. Am I missing something here? Don’t we have a right to speak out against this kind of behavior?
I think the citizens of Wisconsin did … and made their voices loud and clear. I’m just wondering when other states’ legislatures are going to follow suit. I’m surprised more of these lawsuits haven’t happened already.
HOW DOES THIS RULING CHANGE ANYTHING?
It basically appears to mean that in Wisconsin, people can’t be arrested and jailed for violating orders issued by someone not in authority to make these orders in the first place!
This will not be the end of this story either.
THE FIGHT CONTINUES TO SILENCE JUDY MIKOVITS
The mainstream media continues to go out of its way to attempt to debunk the claims made in the video featuring Dr. Judy Mikovits, a whistleblower that has made some serious allegations against the hierarchy in the U.S. government. Watch the clip HERE!
The only reason the mainstream media is doing this is because there is another side to the story … maybe one we’re not being told but was put there to force us to demand the truth. It may be years before the truth comes out, if it does at all.
Whatever the case, the powers that be who put this whole scheme into motion have done so with the appearance of deceit, possibly in an attempt to sabotage the 2020 elections. Whatever the case, no one upstairs is really talking … just demonizing. Again, unless this video hit some “hot buttons” upstairs, why the severe moves to debunk what the video claims and delete it at every turn from every social media website?
UPDATE: ProPublica has decided to launch out with an article trying to debunk Mikovits. This is a link to Marshall Allen’s story:
I’m an Investigative Journalist. These Are the Questions I Asked About the Viral “Plandemic” Video. — ProPublica
The basis for the ProPublica article (according to Allen) was to “help people distinguish between sound reporting and conspiracy thinking or propaganda.” I find that statement odd because the “Plandemic” video was not “news reporting”. It was a presentation regarding a whistleblower. Thus, the attempt to “debunk” a scientist’s “claims”, simply by saying that YouTube, Facebook and Vimeo “removed it from their platforms for violating their guidelines” (and it did not contain pornographic material), is not enough to convince me that something isn’t still suspect about the way the virus was “introduced” into the world’s population. If anything, it clearly proved to me how biological warfare works and how writers who aren’t scientists shouldn’t be wading into waters they’re not qualified to “wade into”.
Ha! “Bad actors sowing discord” via social media … LOL …
Allen continues to take up the balance of his 6-page article attempt to define this video as a journalistic piece, which is where he strays completely away from the specific designation for the release of the video. Right now, all of the rest of the story is “she said, he said”. Then he relies on another source (PolitiFact), which is like letting Snopes “vet” something without investigating fully (by way of a grand jury) by prosecutorial means, whether all of the claims were true. You put people like Fauci in front of a camera, telling people there are 8 different companies making a vaccine but we don’t know if any of them will work or in the least, could have negative side effects (including death) … and couple that with Bill Gates’s way of thinking (that we should treat all humans like dogs and chip them all) … and now you have complete control of a population!
The Plandemic video appears to be a basic drawn-out “trailer” in my book. It’s not the end of this investigation.
Those of you out there searching for the truth are going to have the same suspicions about the furtherance of conspiracy theories coming into fruition, which means they’re not conspiracy theories after all if they end up coming true. Then … they’re reality … and come too late when you can’t control the onslaught of what is happening.
TRUMP SCOLDS FAUCI …
Dr. Anthony Fauci has served under previous administrations. Now he’s serving under this one. He made video comments prior to the 2016 election that a pandemic would occur throughout the world during President Trump’s first term. The question is … how did he know that? Why did he make that statement on camera? Was it a prelude to his upcoming “agenda”?
First … Fauci and the CDC told people NOT to wear masks unless they were sick. Then, they reversed that logic, telling everyone to wear masks.
People who wear masks while driving are as stupid as people who eat Tide Pods. Yet people seem to be “drinking the Kool-Aid” and are locked down in a state of paranoia. No accounting for Darwinism, eh?
People who are sick are quarantined. In this case, whether you were sick or not, you had the “fear of God” put into you that if you got COVID-19, there’s no telling what would happen to you. So, due to “fear of the unknown” … we all capitulated to the whims of government (at least most of us did) bureaucrats … all of whom were advising the President … all of whom made distinctive comments they couldn’t prove either way. There was absolutely no scientific fact presented as to the statement “flatten the curve”, only to denote that the health care system in America is in total shambles. The government’s ass puppets were all as “befuddled” and “uncertain” about how to treat the spread of coronavirus. Hence, the reason why I updated this post from its previous version. How can you tell people what to do when you have no logical reasoning behind your statements? What technically happened here … the powers that be relied on panic and fear mongering and not past history … and ended up making a mountain out of a molehill while destroying America’s economy.
If you look at the timeline, Fauci also told the Senate at the recent hearing that the CDC was testing in January of 2020. Wait a minute. There were only 36 cases at the time the CDC was “testing”? They hadn’t even declared a pandemic (the WHO) until mid-January. Someone either has forgotten the narrative or something more sinister is going on here. What “tests” did they have? Why did WHO wait until it was too late to declare a “pandemic”? Is is true that Bill Gates gives tons of money to the World Health Organization to further his own agenda? THIS is something you need to pursue in your research because there’s a “chip” out there that might have your name on it! Arkansas takes stab at regulating human microchipping – Washington Times
If the foregoing article doesn’t scare the hell out of you, nothing will. Over time, the “brain deads” out there will accept the chip because they all want to be dutiful world citizens. I’m surprised someone has incorporated a chip manufacturing plant and called their new product the “666 Chip”, just to screw with people.
You can hear R.J. Malloy and Dave Krieger “analyze” Fauci’s 4:57 video speech to the Senate on tonight’s (6:04 p.m. EDT) broadcast of City Spotlight-Special Edition on WKDW-FM, 97.5 in North Port, Florida and listen to it live in streaming content HERE! If something strikes you funny, it’s because you too find it difficult to trust the government, the media or anything that any “talking head” spews out. One thing social media doesn’t want is for that “video”, which might have more than an ounce of scientific truth to it, running loose on the internet.
Remember what I said before … misinformation, disinfomation, mischaracterization and demonization.