Tag Archives: chain of title

AMERICA’S HOUSING CRISIS, LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE, IS THE GOVERNMENT’S FAULT!

(OP-ED) — The author of this post is a consultant to trial lawyers handling chain of title and foreclosure matters and thus, cannot render legal or financial advice.  This post is for educational purposes only. 

I was reading a news article in the local paper by a local columnist entitled, “There’s no place for you here …”   The article basically pontificated that low and middle class workers cannot afford this area’s housing market.  If what that columnist said were absolutely true (and I debate his viewpoints in so many ways), whose fault is that?

America continues to face a housing crisis that state governments could create a master plan to solve, yet nothing obvious and straightforward is being done.  We all think that our elected congresspeople and senators in DC will do something about it, since the issue seems to be promoted as a national issue and not a state one.  Not so in my book because it’s all become politically relative.  Politicians simply say what the voters want to hear, whether what they say means anything or not.  The system is rigged to favor the elected and not the body politic.  We need to wake up and face that fact.

THE FORECLOSURE CRISIS CONTINUES TO FUEL THE HOUSING CRISIS … AND VICE VERSA

The “American Dream” has brought with it a ton of lobbying by the banks and their minions and history has shown us the “American Dream” has brought with it a ton of scandal, including the illicit manner that continues to happen in every county’s land records: manufactured assignments.  This garbage is the by-product of Wall Street and its desire to make itself rich through securitization, off the backs of investors and borrowers alike.  Because the laws that are legislated into existence seem to favor the banks and the oligarchs that run this country, a number of ideas are contemplated here:

  1. The politicians that run this country, BOTH Democratic and Republican, have notions in their head that they think they’re better than we are.
  2. Every two to four years, we all get to watch them smear each other on TV with negative campaign ads that frankly unzip the fly of dysfunctional governments at both state and federal levels.
  3. The two-party system rightfully caused this mess and the mess won’t stop until “the system of things” is changed in favor of the people and not in favor of politicians, who get to live out their retirement better than we Americans could ever have it, if we even get to retire.

Despite what you’re reading that is spewed from spoon-fed, government sources, fake news or not, foreclosures are continuing, whether in record numbers or not … and talk about a resolution to this mess is cheap in DC.  With the CFPB (or whatever “new and improved” acronym they want to apply to this now-seemingly worthless bunch of bungling bureaucrats) being watered down, aggrieved consumers can now stop turning to the U.S. government for answers and resolution because it won’t be there for them.

Our problem is … we depend too much on government to be our savior because the government has a bad habit of promising everything, but not without strings attached.  The banks have made sure of that.  Thus, securitization is back in full swing again and the same people who got stung by the last housing crisis are the first in line to apply for their MERS-originated mortgages … rinse and repeat.  Drink the Kool-Aid … rinse and repeat.  People who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it. 

This means more theft of homes, more trashed out and worthless chains of title and more shadow inventory being kept off the books, thus skewing the real numbers of  what’s being illicitly taken … and taken for granted … maybe we don’t have a crisis after all … ahhh … but we do.  And it’s not going away any time soon. As long as builders are building unaffordable homes (homes with a market value of over $250,000), this will force Americans to have to borrow more and drive them deeper into debt.  This is the typical Catch 22 syndrome of the mistakes we made in the last housing boom. Until builders are reigned in or people stop drinking the Kool-Aid, it will be status quo in America. The state and local governments could change that, but they’re not doing anything worth mentioning.

THE “CLASS SYSTEM” GAP IS EXPANDING IN AMERICA

I live in a county where retirees (some with accumulated wealth) comprise better than 25% of the population.  Home building permitting is at a standstill because of the backlog of builders coming back into the picture and the government has complete control of what these builders do, what they build and who they employ while building what they’re building.  Because permitting is taking so long and counties are becoming more particular about construction and design issues as well as code enforcement, the cost of housing becomes the victim of cost overruns.

Only one “affordable housing” project has been contemplated for this area and surprisingly, the home builders who are continuing to build “upscale” housing are part of the debate to limit that type of housing because of the “riffraff” it brings with it.  No one said anything about building “projects” here, as if that has some sort of negative connotation attached to it.   These builders however seem to forget that if only the wealthy people can buy homes in this area and rents are too expensive to support the lower income and middle income families, there won’t be any labor force to accommodate the service businesses needed to wipe the noses (and asses) of the rich people.  Yowsah! Yowsah! Yowsah!  I’m perturbed by this, because I used to own/manage/work in the restaurant business for many years and I can tell you how unpleasant things can get when people who have money take people for granted who are just trying to keep up, absent the snobbish behavior.  I must be a black man trapped in a white man’s body because there are days I wake up and I feel like a “slave to the riddim”.

And I’m not being facetious here.  I’m one of the lower to middle class, just like most of you.  Sure, I have my “American Dream” but it’s different from yours.  I do not support the DC behaviors.  Deep State is counterproductive to forward-thinking government progress because it seeks to disrupt change for the better.  I do not support the two-party system because of what it’s done to America.  I am non-partisan in my thinking here.  I have to be.  We all need to be realistic for the moment because our “spending habits” (Americans are deeper in credit card debt than ever before), which are created by the spending boom that occurs with “holidays” like Black Friday, fuels negative habit patterns that will drive lower to middle-income wage earners deeper into the abyss of debt and make them less likely to be able to even afford to rent because they’re too consumed with their “comfort zones” (what it takes to make us happy in the short term).  Americans rarely ever save (unless they’re rich and they can afford to save) and most live paycheck to paycheck.  What’s in your wallet?  More month than the end of the money?

So if you were fortunate enough to have been born into wealth or accumulated it through investing and working smart, then you can certainly understand what might be in the mindset of that waitress or waiter that takes your order the next time you go out to feast at a corporate restaurant chain because all of the mom and pop operations have since become scarce due to the way our economy has made it unaffordable to start competing small businesses … and yes, not without strings attached … again.

Our state and local governments have played right into this scenario by not mandating affordable housing as part of their “master plan” (albeit Multnomah County/Portland, Oregon is attempting a stab at it) in subdivisions that still provide decent living standards for lower to middle income families with homes priced between $50,000 and 100,000.00!  The success of that program remains to be seen.  The days of the McMansion are gone thanks to the new tax laws that limit the amount of property taxes that can be deducted on a 1040 tax form.  You can thank your DC bunch for that. Only the rich will be able to afford them … and with that … comes a whole different set of problems and risks.

Coupled with the foreclosure crisis, anyone attempting to buy shadow inventory at a discount risks legal battles (prolonged quiet title actions for example) that could prevent them from actually getting a bargain, unscathed.  This includes investors that are trying to accommodate the poor in making housing affordable.  There is going to have to be consideration factored in for rents, because what people will be able to afford will be way less than what the rich can afford.

There is further conflict in reports of whether millienials migrate to the inner city because of job growth or in the alternative, move out into “the ‘burbs” because of space and security.  While one study says millennials can’t afford today’s housing because they don’t save, live from paycheck to paycheck, continue to rely on mommy and daddy when things get tough and are least immune from impulse spending … another study says they’re just fine if they want to move to suburbia and that most of them are, according to studies.  The disinformation campaign isn’t helping matters much because it means more gobbledygook to wade through to get at the real truth.

The influx of foreign workers into this country isn’t helping our economy much because jobs are being created to accommodate those who will work for less.  This is forcing the class system in America to widen because the rich are paying this influx lower wages so they (the rich) can make more money.  Many workers who have migrated into the U.S. seek jobs that pay cash; thus, they pay no taxes, yet they get social security benefits and free health care, which someone else has to pay for.  The two-party system sees this as a means to an end … to woo more non-citizens to become voters so they can vote for the “party”, who influences their choice.  In the meantime, you saw what banks like Wells Fargo did to “encourage” migrant illegal aliens to open bank accounts.  The banks are supported by the U.S. government.  The servicers who work of the banks lie, cheat and steal in the name of the banks, taking property away from hard-working Americans using servicer-manufactured documents containing false and misrepresentative declarations.

WE HAVEN’T EVEN APPROACHED THE IDEA OF A CASHLESS SOCIETY YET

What the banks really want is a cashless society.   Many in the U.S. government support this idea.  Why?

  1. It’s a way to gain personal control of every hard-working American, forcing them to do transactions using a debit or credit card.
  2. Every transaction of the type identified in #1 is already being monitored by the U.S. government (FINCEN) and the private banking sector.
  3. It reduces the amount of goods and services sold and traded in the underground economy (or so they think).  It would actually promote and increase (incentivize) participation in the underground economy, more in rural areas than in the major cities.
  4. The U.S. government can simply take earned “credits” right out of peoples’ bank accounts any time it wants to, for taxes, child support, etc., leaving the individual with nothing to live on.

No one would want to migrate here after a move like that because illegals work for cash.  If no one possessed fiat “cash” (M1) then privacy rights would be completely removed.  By tapping into a bank account, the government could purposefully screw with anyone it wanted to, knowing exactly how much an individual is “leveraged”.  How in the world do you think the writers of Enemy Of The State fathomed this story line?  Do the writers know something we don’t?

When an individual can’t eat and feed his family because his “line of credit” or cash flow is suddenly cut off, what do you think will happen?   A classic “have not” scenario.  He takes from the “haves” by whatever means possible.   You really want to live in a society like that?  America is already ranked as one of the most dangerous places to live by Atlas & Boots and Forbes Magazine.  A cashless society would make a bad thing worse because the police cannot stop random acts of violence when they themselves could become instant victims.  No amount of deposited “fiat credit money” can stop a rebellion or even a full-scale revolution, which is what you’d have if the government insisted on going this route. The major cities would turn into blood baths.  I’m not being paranoid here.  Think about what you would do if you had to face this situation head-on.  What would you do?  After all, you gave the government your tax dollars and you voted for all of these politicians who loaded your “Government By The People” with hundreds of layers of bureaucracy, some of which has broken off and become a part of Deep State.

DO YOU SMELL SOCIALISM?

I majored in political science and journalism in college; thus, I posit the following scenario:

Imagine taking all of the money away from the rich and passing it around to all of the poor to fund the services necessary to accommodate the influx of non-citizens into America.  The poor will spend through all of their newly-found gratis like shit through a goose (an old saying of Gen. George S. Patton) and will then expect MORE.  Now there’s no future for American businesses because the wealthy will not be able to support their businesses and expand their businesses to accommodate more employees because they are broke (or taxed into non-existence), just like the rest of us.  This is why socialism hasn’t worked wherever it’s proliferated because someone has to pay for the “nanny state”, which the government created with your tax dollars. Socialism begats authoritarianism, which begats communism.  The result of communistic behaviors promotes crime (e.g. the Russian mafia, etc.) in order to circumvent and deliberately retaliate against government behaviors.

Everybody likes free stuff!  However, someone has to pay for the services that illegal immigrants are receiving in this country.  Someone has lost a job to an illegal immigrant.  Someone died at the hands of an illegal immigrant.   And more than 5,000 people are trying to get into this country illegally and the whole mess at the San Ysidro border crossing has been politicized to the point of nauseation.  No one is a racist just because they are implementing the laws that are in place in this country.  This is what the executive branch of our federal government was designed to do.  Blame our founding fathers for even thinking that we should all be safe and secure and live in peace and freedom.  Now I’m being facetious.  Depending on which political party (of the two) you belong to, you see 5,000 new voters, voting towards socialism and getting free stuff, or you see 5,000 new voters sucking off the teat of America and at some point in time, someone will have to pay for it. But how?

INCREASING TAXES PROMOTES REVOLUTIONARY IDEAS

Yes … just like in America’s Prohibition Era, whenever taxes were increased, people went underground to survive and the shadow economy flourished.  History has not changed.  U.S. government economists (like Bruce Bartlett) and socialist think tanks are still trying to figure out how to bring the shadow economy under control so they can tax it … yeah, good luck with that.  And who profits from all of this?  The banks.  After all, their “fed” is the one who keeps “loaning money” to the government, so it can continue to write checks its body can’t cash to support “nanny state” philosophies.

People seem to forget how history repeats itself.  It further seems to me that we got into a war with the British over a 3% tea tax, right?

The big outcry at the time was taxation without representation.  Think about the 23 taxes you pay on a loaf of bread and tell me that this country is not the frog swimming around in luke warm water. Unbeknownst to him, the master of the fire is turning the heat up to gradually boil him alive! Think about that the next time you have to pay for someone else’s direct benefit to your detriment (you’re broke again?).

TAXING APPROPRIATE SOURCES

Colorado and Washington State have discovered just how much extra revenue the recreational marijuana business brings in.  The federal government however, ironically doesn’t want to allow marijuana businesses to have bank accounts that the government can get legitimate tax gains from.  The irony of it all is that banks are great sources for laundering drug money, aren’t they?  When people who buy controlled substances like marijuana use cash they’ve taken from their pocket or their bank account, give it to a drug dealer in exchange for pot, who then uses those funds to go out and buy basic necessities to live on and spends the cash right back into the mainstream economy … that money ends up getting deposited into someone else’s bank account at some point in time down the road.  Yet, those in government that have created all of this “reefer madness paranoia” legislation seem to believe that the banking system Uncle Sam borrows from (and then spends it like a drunken sailor) plays no part in it; thus, the government shouldn’t be held accountable, even though it provided the vehicles and the mechanisms in which buying drugs is facilitated.  People pay for drugs with cash … not a debit or credit card.  Any cash can be “laundered” no matter what source it came from, even if legitimate.  Our foolish government could be taxing pot sales at all levels but the politicians won’t listen to the voters, will they?  And that’s just one area that the politicians who allegedly run this country aren’t listening to … or if they are listening … they don’t care and they vote the way they want to vote.  If they want to keep pot illegal, despite what the voters want, they’ll keep pot illegal.  This is another prime example of the way our government is to blame for its failure to counterbalance revenue shortfalls.

THE “CLASS SYSTEM” GAP FUELS THE CRIME RATE

And just when you thought that a cop shooting an unarmed “African-American” wasn’t bad enough, I still maintain that when you displace a family on the street … and the head of household runs out of options, you end up with more murder-suicides, suicides, death by cop and crimes against property when the system can ill afford to maintain law and order in the present day as it is … all because the local government, which has every means to change the environment in every one’s favor, still wants to make its “master plans” cater to those who can afford it.  It doesn’t matter what race, color or creed you are!  The biggest mistake facing America today is allowing the class system “gap” to widen. By allowing the class system gap to proliferate throughout America, the scales could tip to the point that when there’s nothing the “have nots” won’t do to take from the “haves”, we’ll end up in another civil war (regional in nature, maybe) … and it’s our state and federal politicians that have widened this gap … so they can come in and play nanny state.  The widening of the gap promotes the idea that socialism will fix it, which is false (if you’ve studied economics).

When it comes to a prime example of how easy it would be for civil insurrection to occur, visit an area that’s been placed under martial law (you may not see eye to eye with me on this).   Here’s a mild example … go into any hurricane-affected area and see how the government treats the locals.  Why was Blackwater brought into New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina?  To prevent armed insurrection … because that’s where the city was headed. Anyone who has been through the “Superdome” experience can attest to that. When disaster strikes, what’s the first thing the “have nots” do?  Loot!  It never ceases to amaze me that “have nots” would grab TV sets while looting a disaster area when the electricity is out.  You can’t eat or drink a TV.  You really think the pawn shops are going to accept stolen merchandise, just so you can have a cheeseburger?  The “have nots” come in every race, color and creed.  If they have no money and they’re hungry, what do think they’re going to do at the first opportunity? (I’ll let you figure that one out.)

When the 2008 financial collapse occurred on Wall Street, then-Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson was calling congressmen telling them that if they didn’t bail out the banks, martial law might have to be declared.  You see how the government’s mindset behaves when a disaster strikes. Hence, TARP was created.  Even more sadly, most government employees believe everything their government tells them!  That’s how the government gets more support for its nanny state policies!

THE FOUR MOST IMPORTANT BASICS IN LIFE: FOOD, WATER, SHELTER … AND A WAY TO MAKE A DECENT LIVING

If you’re employed in any one of these first three areas, you will always have an income because everyone needs these three things to survive in America.  This is no longer the American Dream but the American Nightmare.  Anyone living under substandard conditions will agree with me that the family unit is in jeopardy.  Tempers flare because of lack of money or the sudden shift in any one of the basic three things needed to survive, which includes being displaced from your home.  I wrote about this in Clouded Titles.

Now that I’ve painted a minuscule picture of  “the ghost of things to come”, we need to take a stand (at least on our own behalf) to take all of these factors into consideration … and then do something civil about it.

FOOD

I find it best to research one of the basic first three areas and find a niche within it.  I know a lot of people that are resellers for survival foods.  I know fewer who have actually now resorted to truck farming (it’s also an underground economic niche and can be very profitable) and I used to help pay my mortgage payments on my first home with a hen house full of laying hens (eggs are great barter material too).  In order to accomplish all that, you might think “country”.  There is a lot of unrestricted land out there and folks living in these areas tend to think a lot alike (they don’t like big government) … something the U.S. government doesn’t like.  Whatever the government doesn’t like is probably a great thing for America because anything that happens in the hinterland benefits the local economy, not DC.  All of the possible changes you could employ to affect a positive outcome for your local economy are a good thing, even if you’ve been foreclosed on and have to start over again.   There are areas of the country where land is still cheap and food production is in demand.  Even in WWII we had “Victory Gardens”.  Flea markets are a great source of networking!  Food trucks can also be a profitable business if run right, albeit you’ll be facing permitting issues and health regulations.

WATER

I cannot believe that people have actually run afoul of the law for harvesting rainwater.  However, it’s a great source of income.  Who would have ever thought that putting water in a plastic bottle and selling bottled water would ever work?  Whoever did is making a killing now because the well hasn’t run dry and the merchants have made the bottled water industry a necessity of life, even if it means you have to dispose of something that’s not biodegradable. With our water supplies / groundwater becoming contaminated (see Flint, Michigan), water filtration systems is also another big business that the wealthy certainly can afford.  Even smaller supply, pour-over systems sell well during hard times.  Man cannot live without water … so getting into any business that involves the production or supply of clean, potable water is a good thing.

SHELTER

Your PLAN B might include doing what I did in buying a tract of land, owner finance. My payments were $222 a month for 10 years.  Even on a fixed income, pulling a used mobile home out onto a tract of land works, especially if it’s paid off.  I used an investment return to pay for getting set up on 3/4-acre mortgage free.  Just to show you I’m not kidding, see below (front and back yard).  I was only 40 minutes from Austin, Texas!

This is what mortgage-free living can look like, if you have a PLAN B that you can start up on a small budget without having to get a mortgage. Anything relative to setting up shelters for people on unrestricted land out in the country is a good thing.  We had German Shepherds roaming the property so we never had to worry about break-ins.  It cost me less than $15,000 out of pocket to set up!   You could even do it for less with a little creative thinking!

It is amazing what you can find out there to live in, it’s peace and quiet country living … and you could put your property into a trust for asset protection to keep it away from the money-grubbing banksters or debt collectors trying to collect on judgments!  Sure, it’s not a McMansion, but it’s home and it’s a stress-free environment!  It’s also far from the madding crowd … so in the event of unrest, you’ve got more time to plan and react if you need to.  Anything connected to real estate … agents, brokers, investors, developers, storage sheds, portable buildings (which can be converted into housing) and cabins … can be profitable with a little marketing. Any carpentry skills become a real plus!

MAKING A DECENT LIVING

Retirement is NOT a part of my vocabulary. I don’t see what the big rush is to retire anyway, given the fact that the government would like you to wait until you’re 70 to start drawing Social In-security. Besides, any business worth having means that an entrepreneurial spirit is probably alive and well and is driving the business forward.  If you’ve lost your regular job (or you think you might lose your job), this is the time to start planning for your future.  An active LLC or incorporation costs next to nothing to set up and consulting businesses (like mine) take a lot less money to start up.  There are books out there that have oodles of information in them on how to start your own business. Find something you’re good at and go for it.  Don’t turn a negative foreclosure into a pity party.  Use it as your learning curve and don’t make the same mistake next time.  Examine what caused you to get into the mess in the first place and then … go out and do just the opposite.  The banks may hate you … but hey, mortgage free living is really where it’s at!  Being self-employed means taking home more of your paycheck NOW and not having to wait on a tax refund from the government, which has been operating in the negative since 1933.  It’s also another great way to live without borrowing!  Being creative about it is what I find most rewarding.  As an afterthought, only create these entities if you have the means to keep track of their accounting and tax filing status.

Retraining in later life is not as bad as it sounds, even if you’re disabled.  As long as you’ve got brains, there’s a consulting position out there or a desk job that will pay you a decent living with little up-front investment.  Thinking positive in this day and age is hard to do. There’s so much negativity around. The idea behind all of what I’ve just stated in my foregoing diatribe is designed to get your inner sanctum churning because the times, they are a-changing, again!

 

12 Comments

Filed under INVESTOR END-GAME STRATEGIES, OP-ED, Securitization Issues

UPDATE: PRO-BANK 5TH U.S. CIRCUIT APPELATES TAKE DOWN ANOTHER HOMEOWNER … MAYBE?

(BREAKING NEWS — OP-ED) —  The author of this post is a paralegal and consultant to attorneys in foreclosure matters and issues involving “the system of things”.  None of what you’re reading in this post should be construed as legal advice nor posited to guarantee a legal outcome.  

UPDATE: Now that the legal community has had somewhat of a chance to review the previously discussed Fifth U.S. Circuit ruling (in THIS case), let’s see what one law firm has to say:  5th Circuit Holds Bankruptcy Stay Tolls Statute of Limitations | Weiner Brodsky Kider PC – JDSupra

This will certainly give you an idea of how the other side thinks.

_______________________________________________________

As promised, I bring you the latest relevant case from the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the Big Easy.  But wait … it wasn’t a “big easy” for the borrower, whose case I worked on long ago (in doing a chain of title assessment for) and whose assignments of deed of trust I use in my chain of title workshops to show “document manufacturing gone wrong”.  Wilshire Credit Corporation, used by Countrywide as one of its servicers,  is to blame for that screw-up.

None of what you’re about to read in this ruling appears proper because no one ever attacked the assignments head on, even when it was suggested to do so. Remember, I can’t give legal advice and it’s sad when I have to read rulings like this, knowing what I know that should have been done, but wasn’t.

So … let’s read the ruling first, then we’ll analyze how the homeowner shot himself in the foot because he put his money where it shouldn’t have been put and didn’t put his money where it should have been put:

HSBC Bank USA NA v Crum, 5th App Cir No 17-11206 (Oct 17, 2018)

We’ll do a little analysis on the chain of title and show you what suspect document manufacturing looks like and my perspective on HOW it should have been challenged.  Is it because of attorney ignorance or just plain and simple frustration?

Let’s see how sharp you are in detecting WHAT went wrong here:

ASSIGNMENT NUMBER ONE                                                                                              

NOTE: Click on the assignment to see it in larger print and click the BACK tab on your computer screen to get back to the article.

I put this assignment FIRST for a reason … look at the time (in the upper, right-hand corner) as to WHEN the assignment was recorded … 11:04:32 a.m. on July 14, 2009.   I surmise that this document was manufactured by employees of the servicer, Wilshire Credit Corporation, to create standing for HSBC Bank USA NA as Trustee for MLMI (that’s Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors) Trust Series 2005-WMC1.  It should be clear to you that “WMC” in the REMIC series was a REMIC set up by WMC Mortgage Corporation, which was the alleged original lender.

The 5th Circuit has already ruled that it doesn’t matter if the original lender went bust BEFORE the documents were created.  How could they do that?   Corruption?  Maybe?   Maybe it was given the wrong information in the pleading.  Maybe?   The appellate court can only rule on the information it was provided and I don’t believe that any of this stuff I’m showing you here was properly vetted in discovery, was it?

Notice something else?   The signer executing this document (a known robosigner), claims to be an “Attorney-in-Fact” for MLMI Lending, Inc., however; as I will show you, she’s not acting as an attorney in fact for WMC Mortgage Corporation, is she?   There’s no written evidence of where the Limited Power of Attorney is recorded on this document, is there?

Also notice that Wilshire Credit Corporation (the mortgage loan servicer) prepared this document and after it was recorded, got it back through the U.S. Mail. This will be important to note for future discussion.

This recording was a 3-page document.  Page 2 contained the legal description.  Now … wait until you see Page 3!

What’s wrong with this picture?  These F**KTARDS can’t even do their job right, can they?   The executor of this document prepared this Allonge to show that the Depositor conveyed it into the REMIC on July 6, 2009.  If you look at the Trust’s 424(b)(5) Prospectus (shown below), the Cut-Off Date for assigning the note and mortgage to the REMIC was January 1, 2005, because (according to the IRS’s Start-up Date for the REMIC) the Closing Date of the REMIC was January 27, 2005.  This Allonge was done over 4-1/2 years later … in violation of the REMIC’s own regulations!  Besides, what do $10/hour employees of Wilshire Credit Corporation know anyway, right?   Who investigated this?  I did!  I told the Borrower long ago what happened to his chain of title.  His attorney apparently didn’t care enough to depose anyone.

Here’s what wrong with this picture:

First, you attach an “Allonge” to the promissory note, NOT an assignment!

Second, the executor of the document, a robosigner-employee of the servicer, claiming to be an attorney-in-fact for MLMI Lending, Inc., not WMC Mortgage Corporation, executed this Allonge less than a WEEK PRIOR TO the actual recording of this assignment!   How convenient is that, considering she is NOT the Lender.

Third, WMC Mortgage Corporation, owned by GE, was closed in 2007 due to the subprime mortgage collapse.  So here we have a servicer’s employee, two years later, claiming she has “attorney-in-fact” status, when most powers of attorney expire when the company GRANTING the LPOA ceases to do business!  It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure this out!  AND …

Fourth, the signer of this document and Allonge is claiming she has power of attorney for MLMI Lending, Inc., right?  Would you please look at the above list of Principal Parties and tell me you see MLMI Lending Inc. anywhere in that document as a listed party to the equation?   So where is Treva Moreland’s authority as a $10/hour mortgage loan servicer’s employee attorney-in-fact status for a lender that closed up shop years earlier?  Oh, wait, the Pro-Bank 5th Circuit doesn’t give a shit, do they?   Or was it the Borrower or the Borrower’s attorney’s fault for not checking into this further?

But wait … it gets better!  (That’s an Al West sarcastic remark!) 

ASSIGNMENT NUMBER TWO

I put this assignment SECOND for a reason … look at the time (in the upper, right-hand corner) as to WHEN the assignment was recorded … 11:13:08 a.m. on July 14, 2009. This document was recorded SEVEN MINUTES AFTER THE FIRST ASSIGNMENT!  Again, I surmise that this document was manufactured by F**KTARD employees of the servicer, Wilshire Credit Corporation, to create standing for HSBC Bank USA NA as Trustee for MLMI (that’s Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors) Trust Series 2005-WMC1.  Notice the same Oregon notary (Justin M. Burns) appears on this assignment as well, claiming that on July 6, 2009, the same day as Treva Moreland, the signer of the first-recorded assignment claims to have attorney-in-fact status …

Here comes Melissa Tomlin (another $10/hour Wilshire Credit Corporation F**KTARD employee), claiming she’s an Assistant Secretary for “MERS” as Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. for then-defunct WMC Mortgage Corporation … AND … she’s assigning BOTH the Note and Mortgage to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. from WMC Mortgage Corporation who (now-defunct) is a “valid Assistant Secretary” for MERS … WOW!  MERS’s resolutions must really be legally sound to be able to have servicer’s employees creating shit documents out of thin air using MERS as a nominee for a closed company … Hmmm … I wonder what agency relationship existed between MERS and WMC after GE closed WMC over two years earlier?

This assignment was also 3 pages in length and was prepared and mailed back to Wilshire Credit Corporation after it was recorded.  Page 2, like before, contains the legal description of the subject property.   And now … for the GRAND FINALE … let’s see what’s on Page 3, shall we? (I am chuckling at this juncture, see if you can figure out why):


Notice what’s on the last page?   AN INDORSEMENT STAMP to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Lending, Inc. by WMC Mortgage Corporation!   Again, I surmise the following:

First, endorsements belong on either the promissory note or the allonge to note (if the promissory note is full of endorsements and cannot accommodate any more of them) … NOT ON A RECORDED ASSIGNMENT!

Second, the executor of the document, a robosigner-employee of the servicer, claiming to be an Assistant Secretary for MERS as nominee for then-defunct WMC Mortgage Corporation, HAD KNOWLEDGE OF what she signed when she affixed her signature to the document (that the indorsement stamp was affixed to page 3 therein), or should have had knowledge of it, right?

Third, you’d think she’d have every opportunity, being an Officer of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (Assistant Secretary), by alleged resolution ONLY and not attorney-in-fact, that she’d have some smarts about stuff like this. Nope! Doesn’t appear that way, does it?  In fact, I’m not even sure that Melissa Tomlin (after doing several signature comparisons on assignments from around the country) actually was the party executing this document!

Fourth, remember, WMC Mortgage Corporation, owned by GE, was closed in 2007 due to the subprime mortgage collapse.  So here we have a servicer’s employee, two years later, claiming she has an agency relationship with MERS as an Assistant Secretary, when in fact she’s a Wilshire Credit Corporation employee (clearly, a misrepresentation of fact), when the company GRANTING the nominee status to MERS to create an alleged (unproven) agency relationship in the first place, is no longer business!

Fifth, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that when a company goes bust, agency relationships can be challenged!  I don’t ever see that happening in this case, do you?  (If you do, please correct me in the comments section of this post so everyone can see how uninformed I am!)

But wait … it gets better!  (That’s another Al West sarcastic remark!) 

No one knows how this happened … BUT … either the documents were improperly submitted wrong by Wilshire Credit Corporation when they mailed the packet to the Dallas County Clerk’s Office for recording in his Official Real Property Records … OR … the Clerk’s office juxtaposed the documents … SO … here’s what happened (you may have already figured this out … this is a fun example of a brain teaser for you researchers out there) to screw up the borrower’s chain of title with suspect documents (fact check these if you will):

(1) At the time BOTH assignments were executed, WMC Mortgage Corporation was no longer in business (not that the 5th U.S. Circuit really cares).

(2) MERS was used to cover up the chain of title, even though the agency relationship more than likely ended when WMC closed up shop (there was never a repudiation agreement against the MERSCORP executory contract ever filed in WMC’s bankruptcy, if it fact, it filed for such).

(3) In order for the facts to present themselves in proper order, the second assignment SHOULD HAVE BEEN recorded FIRST to reflect the transfer of the Note and Mortgage to MLMI Lending, Inc. from WMC, so MLMI Lending, Inc. could properly convey it into the REMIC Trust.

(4) But wait!  MLMI Lending, Inc. is nowhere to be found in the Prospectus for the REMIC under “Principal Parties”.  The originating lender was subprime mortgage lender WMC Mortgage Corporation.  True sale #1 would have been from WMC to the Seller, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc., an entirely separate corporation from Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Lending, Inc., right?  So True Sale #1 was F**KED UP!

(5) True Sale #2 should have been from Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc. to Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., the Depositor for the trust, who, under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement found in the Prospectus, signed under penalty of perjury under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, would have and should have completed True Sale #3 by transferring it into the REMIC itself, as the Issuer of the Certificates!

(6) All true sales had to be completed before the Cut-Off Date … so in fact we have a violation of the trust agreement and a misrepresentation in the Prospectus, if we are to believe what just happened here was factual.

(7) The misrepresentations contained within the Assignments themselves purport to have transferred everything (in order) from WMC to MLMI Lending, Inc. and from MLMI Lending, Inc. to the REMIC Trust; however, with them being recorded in reverse, it would have been impossible to represent this the other way around, so the entire chain of custody of the note is convoluted and so is the chain of title, creating suspect issues for discovery.

(8) Because MERS (Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) cannot convey Notes because it doesn’t have an interest in the Notes (it only allows lenders to record them in the MERS® System database), then the entire claimed transfer by the servicer’s employee (and NOT the lender itself, who was by then defunct) was also misrepresentative in fact.

(9) Further, all of these misrepresentations appear to constitute violations of the Texas Penal Code and the fact the U.S. Mails were used could constitute felony mail fraud (two counts), which is a 95% slam dunk for the prosecution.  Thus, had “the system of things” played itself out the way it should have been played out, Treva Moreland, Melissa Tomlin and Justin Burns would all be doing time instead of going about their feeble lives doing whatever.

(10) Under “the system of things”, the attorneys for the bank relied on these assignments to steal Mr. Crum’s property and should be disbarred.  The judge in the state court could obviously NOT be held accountable for the fraud on his court, because he wasn’t made aware of it at the time the suit was filed and answered (the Texas Constitution requires all HELOC’s to be judicial challenges under Rule 736 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure).  If the judge was made aware, he could have lost his bond and have been removed from the bench and the headlines would have grabbed national attention!

(11) And now … for the piece d’resistance … the lawsuit filed by the alleged REMIC, for which it got a judgment against Mr. Crum, conveniently alleged that Mr. Crum was in default, when in fact, the REMIC’s own Prospectus required Wilshire Credit Corporation to make Mr. Crum’s payments on the home if he couldn’t make them … see here, see here:

Notice where is says (in Paragraph 2 of the foregoing paragraphs) that the Servicer (Wilshire) is obligated to make such advances with respect to delinquent payments of principal and interest on each Mortgage loan … how then, could Mr. Crum be in default?   If MLMI 2005-WMC1 was never aware of the default, which we know probably didn’t happen since the servicer was making all of the advance payments, then WHO actually was foreclosing on Mr. Crum?

(12) Wilshire Credit Corporation … using what I claim are false and misrepresentative documents!  But I’m not the expert witness here (but I have an attorney who is though).  I still see a mess in the constructive notice to the world of when the documents were juxtaposed.  Improperly recorded documents put the cart before the horse, didn’t they?  Can you see it spelled out now?

Any decent, well-informed, non-agenda’d judge should have been aware of all of this … but then again, they only review what’s put in front of them and what’s challenged and why.   You be the judge as to WHO failed WHO here and why.

I had all the facts in 2011.  Now they’ve come home to roost over seven years later … in a bad way!  I can definitely say discovery was sorely lacking here!

Join Dave Krieger and R. J. Malloy for another exciting segment of City Spotlight – Special Edition on WKDW-FM, 97.5 in North Port, Florida, this Friday night at 6:00 p.m. (Eastern) … the subject matter this week … blockchain, jurisdictional issues, societal breakdown and the latest from the ABA blogs!  To listen to the show, CLICK HERE!

 

 

 

 

 

11 Comments

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED, Securitization Issues

UPDATE: BRUCE JACOBS IS FIGHTING BANK OF AMERICA!

UPDATE FROM MIAMI —

Miami-Dade Judge Bronwyn Miller has rejected attorney Bruce Jacobs’ demands that Bank of America be sanctioned for withholding and destroying records … 1.8-billion of them!  There was no specific reason given for the Judge’s decision.  Bank of America (of course) argues that Jacobs’ claims were baseless.

Jacobs had accused the bank of purging the records while under a court-ordered subpoena (in another foreclosure case) to hide evidence of alleged fraud because the original records may have been altered.  Bank of America responded by stating that the records were copied by an outside firm and returned to the bank and that it was the “outside firm’s copies that were purged”.  Bank of America’s attorney stated that Jacobs’ claims were not relevant to this matter because they were based on claims from another case raised in bankruptcy court.  (See the article below for clarification!)

 

See the following link:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/11/bank-of-america-fights-court-battle-over-purge-of-nearly-2-billion-bank-records.html

NOTE:  Bruce has asked me to repost this!

OP-ED — It is not surprising that the individual documents involved in the particular case are not a part of the scrutiny involved here.  Anyone reading any “manufactured” Bank of America document could understand that in (for a time) in Simi Valley, California, tens of thousands of so-called fraudulent assignments of both mortgages and deeds of trust were created under the direction of Bank of America in order to create standing so it could foreclose on affected homeowners.  Many of these documents contained “CoreLogic” on them.  We know from a certain interview with a former contract worker at Simi Valley (in the document manufacturing plant there) that he was signing documents as a Vice President of Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and he didn’t even know who MERS was.  Documents were always referenced back to CoreLogic in Chapin, South Carolina.  Remember the LPS debacle?

Title companies and document processing plants that go out of their way to create documents (or be involved in the creation of them) are NOT your friend!

Many of these documents claim that Bank of America, NA ended up with (as an assignee, or transferred to another party as an assignor) an assignment of mortgage or deed of trust as the result of a merger involving “BAC Home Loans Servicing LP fka Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP”, which we have researched thoroughly and found to be false, as Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. was not directly subsumed into Bank of America, N.A.   Oops!  We forgot Red Oak Capital and another merger entity.  The point being … if the other side is going to claim that it acquired something by merger … don’t you think it’s necessary to make them prove it?   We take too much of this for granted and don’t recognize when something is that obvious that we “forget” to challenge it. Every state in the U.S. has a civil component for attacking fraudulent documents.  Why is no one using them to their fullest extent?

Of the documents we now find worthy of discovery: (a.) all assignments in the chain of title; (b.) limited powers of attorney recorded for the benefit of the assignee (Grantee); and (c.) agency and/or merger agreements.  The Grantee (or Assignee) of an agency relationship cannot prove that relationship.  It must be legally proven by the Grantor (or Assignor) of the relationship!  For example … how can a Borrower “agree” that an agency relationship between Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. exists on a mortgage or deed of trust when the Borrower has no proof or personal knowledge of such?

This is why homeowners should regard anything involving “MERS” as suspect and (as we suggest) … walk away from the closing table!  It’s bad enough that over 80-million homes have issues involving their chains of title because of MERS and yet people keep going to the closing table and signing these documents without reading them because they just want the damned keys to the house, whether it financially and psychologically affects them in the future!

This is why we see increased bankruptcy filings, suicides and murder-suicides related to foreclosure cases all over America!  There are portfolio lenders (like fsnb.com) out there … why aren’t we using them instead?   And now another round of subprime mortgages has hit the national marketplace and people who got into trouble in Round One are the first ones standing in line for Round Two.  When will we learn that those who are ignorant of history are condemned to repeat it?

In my next post, I’m going to present a 5th U.S. Circuit case where a REMIC won because of a homeowner’s failure to properly attack his case!  This case involves not one but TWO Assignments of Deed of Trust that were not only servicer “manufactured” but recorded in “reverse”, which would appear to have negated the effectiveness of BOTH of them!  You be the judge!

3 Comments

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED

BRUCE JACOBS CATCHES FLAK FROM FLORIDA’S THIRD DCA!

(BREAKING NEWS – OP-ED) —

The statistics are unlike anything I personally have ever seen as a consultant to attorneys on matters of foreclosure, chain of title and the system of things … BUT Miami-Dade foreclosure defense attorney Bruce Jacobs has put himself in the firing line by causing the Third DCA into an apparent retaliation by issuing Jacobs a Show Cause Order as to why he should not be sanctioned for violating not only Florida Appellate Rules of Procedure but Florida Bar Rules as well.  I’ve personally met and talked with Bruce Jacobs, a former Miami-Dade State’s Attorney, a devout follower of Judaism.  There are those in the foreclosure world who think little of him for various reasons, while others think he’s too busy to handle their cases, while yet others believe he is a true fighter for “the little guy”.

Miami’s Daily Business Review (via law.com) just broke a story yesterday (October 4, 2018) of the potential sanction news against Jacobs. After doing a little digging, I found the subject per curium ruling that put Jacobs in the crosshairs of some very pissed off judges.  It all stems from their reversal of the famous HSBC v. Buset case, where Jacobs represented the Busets.  After the 3rd DCA’s reversal, I asked Bruce about their opinion in Buset and he told me succinctly that “This is war! This ain’t over yet!”

In a State where homeowners have had more opportunity to figure out “the system of things” as to how foreclosure courts behave, the statistics you’re about to read, which were contained in a filing with the Florida Supreme Court in the cited case, includes statistical evidence of how Florida’s Third DCA is apparently biased and prejudiced against delinquent homeowners:

Alexander v Bayview Loan Svcg LLC, 3D16-2228 (filed April 20, 2018)

Knowing what I know about phony assignments, I proffer an idea here that squarely puts “the system of things” into motion.  By reading this “Opinion” issued by the Third District Court of Appeals in Florida, see if you can make out the frustration not only felt by Bruce Jacobs but by virtually ALL homeowners who’ve ever been in front of any judge in the Third DCA:

Aquasol Condominium Assn Inc v HSBC Bank USA NA et al, 3D17-0352 (Sep 26, 2018)

Again, Jacobs has locked horns with a nemesis that has a propensity to lie in the manufacture of assignments.  In a case in Hillsborough County, Florida, HSBC’s “document manufacturing” came under serious scrutiny and the recorded document was ordered cancelled and expunged from the Clerk of the Circuit Court’s official records in that county.  The case involving that apparent suspect document is still ongoing and if “the system of things” is allowed to play itself out, one particular foreclosure mill law firm and five of its attorneys could be facing the same consequences as Jacobs is now.  It is problematic that most homeowners let their frustrations get in the way of common sense, but the latest “Opinion” seriously appears to put Jacobs in a very tenuous position, since he’s called out the Third DCA for what he believes they apparently are … biased and prejudiced against homeowners … enough to ignore obvious frauds on their own court systems!

However, it should also be made clear here (IMHO) that “the system of things” as I have described in the 10-part series, “Gutting the Underbelly of the Beast” was not implemented in Buset … was clearly not implemented in Alexander … and was definitely NOT implemented in Aquasol, predicated on what didn’t happen in Buset.  That may be tough for some to get their head around; however, when you see the quotes that Bruce Jacobs included in his brief to the Third DCA, which made them recoil, it’s clear the Opinion they issued was really a Show Cause Order that the media is now going to make a 3-ring circus out of, especially in light of what happened to Pinellas County foreclosure defense attorney Mark Stopa.  It’s obvious that Florida does not like aggressive foreclosure defense attorneys, whose first duty is to “the Court”.   With the advent of a Florida judge testifying (at Stopa’s hearing) that Florida foreclosure court judges are incentivized to clear their dockets and receiving bonus cash rewards for doing so, it is very clear that our courts have allowed their own political agendas to taint “Lady Justice”.

I’ve always said it’s about the assignments.  It’s always about the assignments.  This is why C&E actions are so vitally important:

(1)  They dissect the false and misrepresentative information contained within the assignments that are being relied upon by bank’s counsel in foreclosure proceedings.  This involves deposing robosigners.  HSBC has robosigners.  They defaulted when challenged in a C&E as to what authority they had to execute the document.

(2) They bring to light certain statutory violations. Florida has a civil component to its criminal component in F.C.C. § 817.535, which some attorneys rarely use and if they use it, apparently don’t go far enough in using it. They “drop the ball” by NOT doing a C&E on the document called into question.  This is no different than a pro se homeowner going into court and waving a document around and calling it a fraudulent document.  Same results. The Court says, “Prove it!” … and you have no proof!  So piss off!

(3) They bring to light certain ethical violations. Imagine you’re a foreclosure mill lawyer who’s relying on the false and misrepresentative information contained within an Assignment of Mortgage (or even an Assignment of Deed of Trust, for those of you in non-judicial states that have sought to litigate a matter to stop a foreclosure), and you (a.) failed to exercise due diligence in vetting your evidence; (b.) were purposefully involved in the creation of the fraudulent document; and (c.) new or should have known that the information you proffered to the Court would result in a statutory violation.  There are individual Bar Rules in every State that call out this type of behavior.  These Rules fall under the section labeled “Misconduct”.  On occasion, State Bar Associations and Courts across America have to deal with such matters; however, foreclosure cases are particularly egregious in nature because the ethical violations appear to arise out of statutory violations being promulgated on the Court.

(4) They require a determination as to their validity of the document in question.  In the Hillsborough County matter, HSBC had every opportunity to respond, yet didn’t.  When you look at the C&E’s allegations there, HSBC employees could have been facing felony UPL charges.  Duh!  It’s no wonder they didn’t show up.  The good ‘ol boy network on occasion does “circle the wagons” to protect its own practitioners.  I gotta give ’em credit for their somewhat misplaced allegiance.  They pick and choose who they want to prosecute.  Obviously, the several HSBC employees aren’t in jail, so they’ll keep manufacturing phony documents (like every other mortgage loan servicer has done since they were told not to in 2012).

(5) They require a definitive action by the Court.  When presented with the facts, the judge in the Hillsborough County matter cancelled the document and ordered it expunged from the real property records.  That expungement was not detected by the foreclosure mill law firm.  That expungement created further triable issues of fact.  That expungement, in of itself, created a statutory violation.  That expungement further convoluted the chain of title, impairing that property’s vendibility.

(6) They are the “backbone” of any quiet title action.  Once eliminated, assignments and other documents set the basis for the complaint or counterclaim sounding in quiet title because the “obstacle” that the bank has to contend with is an illicit document, shown to be fraudulent, or in the alternative, proven to be fraudulent, with expert witness trial testimony from an attorney to back it up in subsequent cases.  This posits a very serious scenario for the foreclosure mill law firm.  It posits an even more of an issue for any judge hearing the subsequent quiet title action, because the same unclean hands that created and/or relied on the phony document that was cancelled and expunged through the C&E have now come home to roost.

As long as the homeowners are in a position to control the outcome of their cases, the C&E may become a vital tool to measurably determine the success or failure of their destinies.  Sadly, as vigorous of a defense that any foreclosure defense attorney could throw at the other side, especially in this matter, the C&E wasn’t part of it.  Without a basis in finality, how then can “the system of things” work to impose sanctions on the real violators and unseat judges for agreeing with them?

6 Comments

Filed under BREAKING NEWS, OP-ED

GUTTING THE UNDERBELLY OF THE BEAST – PART 9

(OP-ED, first posted: September 25, 2018) —

The writer of this post is a paralegal and consultant to attorneys on matters involving chain of title, foreclosures and document manufacturing.  The opinions expressed herein are that of the writer’s only and do not constitute legal or financial advice.  Any use of the theories or ideas suggested in this post is entirely at your discretion and will probably result in disaster without the proper legal help.

As we near the close of this 10-part segment, I posit that this may not be the climactic end you were hoping for.

Creating a big, bad ass paper trail to be used to trigger those “safeguards” in “the system of things” takes time, time that a lot of litigants don’t have because they didn’t make the time.  Maybe they weren’t afforded the time … the time to learn about how “the system of things” works.   While I’ve always maintained that the Internet can be a dangerous place to search for clues or resolve to anything, the “safeguards” that make up “the system of things” have been maintained within the “status quo” for quite some time (decades).  You’ve probably heard that old saying, “Well, it’s the best system we’ve got!”   Why change it?   Maybe, because it’s NOT the best system at present.  In fact, the way that “the system of things” has been abused, perhaps we need to re-examine HOW “the system of things” is supposed to work and give the balance of what’s wrong with “the system” itself an enema.  In order to do that, we have to wake “the system” up … and you cannot do that in federal court … yet.

WAKING UP THE BEAST!

There are roughly 3,041 counties, boroughs, townships, etc. that now exist in America.  Most if not all of them are incorporated.  Most if not all of them are self-insured to a degree.  Most of them carry liability insurance for certain aspects of their “day to day affairs” in the management of county government.  The cities within the counties also have certain types of insurance that is supposed to safeguard the body politic from harm, in case a city (or county) employee injures someone while acting within the course and scope of their employment.   This is an important set of terms to remember: “the course and scope”.  Judges are also paid by the county in virtually every situation, to sit on the bench and administer the “day to day affairs” brought before them during the course and scope of their employment.

Waking “the system of things” up (and in your favor) would seemingly involve …

(1) identifying the statutory problem you (as a property owner) are faced with … which is legislation that was passed that allows every property owner to challenge the legitimacy of documents in the public record as being suspect;

(2) bringing forward a claim against the perpetrators who created-manufactured-executed the document in question … generally involving declaratory relief, which opens up the needed discovery to expose the liability;

(3) bringing forward an expert witness affidavit and testimony to support your claim … this is best done by an attorney who has figured out HOW “the system of things” is supposed to work and can help to build your big, bad ass paper trail;

(4) taking the entire “bad ass paper trail” in documented form to several different “layers” within the county government and within the private sector (insurance and bonding).  We see four (4) copies of this paper trail as a necessity!

Once class action lawyers figure out what we’re trying to accomplish here, they are probably going to get busier (in the future), once it becomes firmly fixed in their minds HOW TO raid a county treasury because of some judge’s screw-up in allowing felony behavior to spew forth from his courtroom.   It’s just like having a bailiff purposefully hover over you while you’re trying to speak to the judge.  It’s intimidating.  As long as the judge knows he can play God for 5 minutes and get away with it (because you’re broke, desperate and don’t know anything), you’ll continue to have a bad feeling about today’s justice system, especially foreclosure courts (whether you’re in a judicial or non-judicial state, it doesn’t matter).

THE BIG, BAD ASS PAPER TRAIL

For those of you who are still having trouble fathoming the substance of the “big, bad ass paper trail” … I shall endeavor to spell it out for you:

(1) The complete trial transcript (if you’re in a judicial state) of the foreclosure case, including all exhibits (or in a non-judicial state, by your own litigation filing and said responses from “the other side”);

(2) The complete oral transcript of every hearing involving your case, conducted by said tribunal, certified by your own court reporter;

(3) The complete certified set of all oral transcripts taken at every deposition of every party summoned to testify that was involved in the creation-manufacture-execution and recording of the suspect document;

(4) The complete set of every document in your chain of title to your property, from the Warranty Deed (i.e., see also Grant Deed, Special Warranty Deed, Quit Claim Deed, Statutory Warranty Deed, etc.); and

(5) A certified, original copy of all documentation and four (4) copies of same (for distribution within the “layers” of “the system of things”) to present to authoritative committees (the judicial review panel and the state bar’s disciplinary panel) and the insurers (E & O and bonds).

Copy #1: The Judicial Review Panel (against the judge, along with a judicial misconduct complaint);

Copy #2: The State Bar Disciplinary Committee (against the lawyer for the bank who came into court and misrepresented the truth about the documents he/she relied on);

Copy #3: The E & O carrier for the law firm and their attorneys (including the attorney being accused of felony behavior in your case); and

Copy #4: The County’s Risk Manager, in an attempt to obtain bonding information on the judge (to attack the bond, have the matter investigated by the insurance company and seek to file a claim against the bond and have it pay out and/or have it revoked; thus, unseating the judge from the bench).

You may wish to have a separate fifth (5th) copy available in case the county wants to keep its copy and not forward it to the judge’s bonding carrier.

The whole stack of stuff should be somewhere between 4″ and 6″ thick!

What I have just described to you are the “safeguards” (the preliminary ones) that are supposed to be in place to attack the lower echelons of “the system of things”.  The upper echelons (the federal system) are used to plunder the county treasury if the Risk Manager, the County Commission and the perpetrators themselves refuse to “do the right thing” (and/or settle).  You DO NOT do this on your own dammit!  You have no mandate to report wrongdoing to the bar or the judicial review panel … ONLY ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES DO!   So stop with the pro se, pro per, sui juris Patriot crap and start thinking “system” … as it is and has it has been set up to function.  Stop trying to cram your giant square peg into the small, round hole (that is “the system of things”)!  If you ignore this, you do so at your own peril.  You risk creating bad case law for everyone else by not knowing what you’re doing and you also risk potential, physical harm to you and your family (remember Ruby Ridge … I was going to post Vicky Weaver’s autopsy photos but my “legal voice of reason” talked me out of it).  I cannot begin to emphasize how serious this shit is once you’ve awakened “the beast” (in other words, you’d best have legal help … and not a Patriot, non-lawyer either).

The original, certified copy remains with you for the potential follow-through with the State Tort Claims Act suit, if one is necessary, against the county or city in question, which would force “the system of things” to either litigate the matter or settle with you.

You are NOT prosecuting a criminal action here.  This is a civil matter involving statutory and ethical violations!

THE NON-JUDICIAL SETTING

I haven’t spoken much about non-judicial issues here because it is incumbent upon the homeowner to do one of two things: (1) pack up and move; or (2) file a lawsuit to stop the foreclosure and fight.   If you look at your chain of title and you see a chain of assignments … ALL of them come into play here.  If one of those assignments can be proven to be false and misrepresentative (it’s likely almost all of them are or will be), then you can rattle the other side’s cage and topple the entire chain of assignments like dominoes.  Proving fraud on the court cannot come out of your own mouth however.  That determination comes out of the mouth of the judge, who does “the right thing”!   “The system of things” does not offer YOU that opportunity.  You have to put together a civil action (preferably based on declaratory relief and negligence), coupled with proving a civil conspiracy (NOT RICO!), which is easier to prove because the burden of proof is lower.

If you are frustrated because you are currently losing, it’s because you’re not paying attention to “the system of things”.   You are acting out of desperation and not using the common sense and wisdom God gave you.

This is why we wrote the 40-page booklet explaining it:

I do not hand this work out likely, for what’s in this book is that “baby with a stick of dynamite with a short fuse” … and you are NOT going to abuse “the system of things” out of sheer desperation.  We are not going to allow that to happen.  There is a right way and a wrong way to approach how the scenario plays out.  We have to create the big, bad ass paper trail, starting with your chain of title.  Every chain of title tells a story.  What does yours say?   BTW, leave the word “fraud” out of your vocabulary here.  The new words to affix in your brain are:  “statutory violations”, “ethical violations”, “false and misrepresentative”, “negligent misrepresentation”, “negligence”, “misrepresentation” and “felony behavior”.   Why?  Because the insurance companies clearly understand what these terms are and are NOT likely to pay out claims based on these terms!  THAT can work to your advantage and to the other side’s disadvantage!

If the judge does the right thing (like the cases noted in Part 7 of this series of posts), and you get your evidentiary hearing, you may find yourself either settling out of court or in the alternative, awarded hefty damages by a jury or sanctions by a judge (like your home).   One thing is for certain, every insurance company in your state is going to know what’s going on … as you cannot allow the law firm you would be pursuing or its attorneys an opportunity to become “re-insured” through another carrier due to their propensity to commit the same torts and felony behavior.  If you’re going to do a takedown … well … it’s like that old saying, “If you’re going to shoot the King, you’d better make sure you kill him!”   That means, whatever judge allows the felony behavior to continue in his court … and/or … the ethical violations … without doing due diligence to “peel away the onion” and expose bank illegality for what it is … will expose the county (as well as the judge) to a very long-winded, unpleasant experience in U.S. District Court … and you better make sure that judge never returns to the bench (otherwise, you face possible retribution)!

ALL THE WHILE MAINTAINING CIVILITY

And remember, we’re being “civil” here.  This is not politically motivated speech, like “push back”, a statement used some time ago by a congresswoman who doesn’t even live in her own district which has polarized America.  This same congresswoman even said, “if you shoot me, you better shoot straight”.  What kind of B.S. is that?  I’m sure Steve Scalise didn’t find that at all funny.   But then again, this is America, where BOTH parties have contributed to the mess we’re all in. BOTH parties voted “the system of things” into being.

Don’t think that barricading yourself in your house is going to make a statement either.  Remember what happened to Martin Wirth?   We don’t want to see you end up like that.  Or Vicky Weaver.  Or David Koresh.  These people were stubborn and all became victims of their own ignorance and political beliefs.  This is what “the system of things” is geared towards.  Absolute power corrupts absolutely … and if you’re going to lock horns with the beast, you’d better make sure you’re within striking distance of its underbelly; otherwise, all of this is for naught.

THE STATE TORT CLAIMS ACTION = SHTF

The “other side” knew that at some point I’d be getting to this part.

Remember that suit the two Oregon lawyers filed against their own state bar?   It was filed in U. S. District Court, right?

Why is that so?  Because the attorneys were quoting federal statutes, which put it firmly within the jurisdiction of the federal court!

You can’t expect the “county” or “state” itself to allow you to sue it, do you?

Major obstacles, if not a total cover-up.   Major threats will probably be bandied about.

Late night phone calls.  Silence, followed by breathing and maybe, if you’re lucky, a whispered,  “I know where you live.”

Stalking by suspicious vehicles either outside your home or at places you frequent.

Tapping your phones without a warrant.

Breaking into your home and putting keystroke technology into your computers to read your emails.

Bugging your home or office.

Bribing federal court clerks to hide your paperwork so it’s not timely filed and thus gets excluded.

Texting death threats to your cell phone (showing pictures of your kids playing in the front yard).

Changing the locks on your doors when the foreclosure sale hasn’t even happened.

Cleaning out the contents of your home before the foreclosure sale has even occurred.

Real estate brokers showing up to your home wanting to know when you’re going to move out.

Your family pets disappear.

Oh, you think I’m joking?

Every one of the things I just described above has happened to homeowners in the course of the last twenty (20) years, since securitization and bad banking behavior started running rampant across America.  We’re talking billions of dollars of insurance payouts here and the banks and their henchmen (their servicers) are going to ratchet up their illicit behaviors.  You will have to be strong when it comes to this point in “the system of things”, because this is no longer a “game of thrones”, to see who will be King.  This is a matter of survival for those who are able to procure the most evidence in the shortest amount of time, because the other side is going to have fair warning and is going to have ample time to either come to the table or retaliate.

You cannot file one of these actions unless you give the county (the political subdivision) fair warning.

THIS is what risk managers are for.   If the county is too small, then the County Executive gets the warning.  They have to be warned to be given time to settle.

That is a statutory requirement in most states.  Sorry … you don’t get to ambush the county with a lawsuit in federal court without trying to negotiate settlement first.

Yes, it’s administrative bullshit.  But it’s “the system of things”, right?

Most counties have general liability insurance and vehicle insurance to cover the expected … a slip and fall on an icy courthouse step … a collision with a county vehicle driven by a county employee performing his lawful duties … yet no one expected “the system of things” to “right itself” on the backs of phony documents, did they?

There comes a breaking point, when someone has to “cry Uncle”!   … and this is that breaking point.  There has to be a way to deal with phony assignments.  The system of things has had that in place all along.  We just didn’t realize it … and what it was going to take to make it work the way it’s supposed to.

There’s more to the story in the final segment (Part 10) of these posts, so stay tuned!

 

7 Comments

Filed under OP-ED